|
Post by soonerlew on Mar 15, 2009 17:56:35 GMT -5
By: dennissullenger 15 Mar 2009, 04:36 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 817420 of 817447
Jump to msg. # AHHH, How comforting..some things ya can depend on..sunrise, sunset, taxes...and Gumby posting his minimum security housing little black heart out week after week. Bwhahahahahah go cmkx em dennis
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Mar 15, 2009 17:57:39 GMT -5
By: monetaryshift 15 Mar 2009, 03:13 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 817392 of 817448
Jump to msg. # For Those Who Missed It:
I confirmed with the SEC and 1st Global that the 622B Unregistered Shares "R" seperate from the BonaFide shares - End Of Story
By: snoopstock5 15 Mar 2009, 05:41 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 817424 of 817448 (Reply to 817392 by monetaryshift)
Jump to msg. # All you had to do was look at the 12/31/04 shareholder list to confirm this. The real question is, "How many shares did UC hold?". Since we have an unshareholder website, I don't think our shares were paid for.
2,251,156,493,816 (1,472,637,618,816) 15344 15345 778,518,875,000
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Mar 15, 2009 17:58:55 GMT -5
By: val-u-man 15 Mar 2009, 06:30 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 817430 of 817448
Jump to msg. # Since Frizzo said he "proved" a "huge NSS" 4 years ago, shouldn't he have a huge package by now? And I mean a huge package filled with money, not the other kind of huge package.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Mar 15, 2009 18:00:20 GMT -5
By: chrisl31509 15 Mar 2009, 04:23 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 817419 of 817448 (Reply to 817404 by notthetroll)
Jump to msg. # So nutjob the SEC who was investigating CMKM back in 2003 allowed the opinion letters of Dvorak and Glenn as the investigation was going on and also allowed the culprits to put into the market thru various brokers from the transfer agent 622 billion unregistered securities? That is what you are saying?
By: rosencrantz2010 15 Mar 2009, 06:37 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 817433 of 817448 (Reply to 817419 by chrisl31509)
Jump to msg. # nutjob and jonas, i would like to read your answer to that question. it seems fair, especially since you claim to know all this stuff.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Mar 15, 2009 18:01:31 GMT -5
By: val-u-man 15 Mar 2009, 06:47 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 817440 of 817448
Jump to msg. # Has Frizzo even sued "Shorty" yet? After 4 years, it seems he has admitted there is no "Shorty" and is only going after some of the CMKX scammers.
ROI = negative 100% to negative 99% of investment.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Mar 15, 2009 18:02:20 GMT -5
By: aladin99 15 Mar 2009, 06:54 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 817447 of 817448
Jump to msg. # Chrisl - UC/RG raised 600B shares and we are still having 622B U/S...This is the key of the 54c....
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Mar 15, 2009 18:09:42 GMT -5
seagull Administrator CMKX Gossip Column Re: gossip 3/15/09 « Reply #3 Today at 10:09am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- By: KFL Yesterday at 10:41pm, rrileyraegen wrote: Its all very logical - Tyler never issues formal Press Releases, just posts on a web site that will disappear in the dead of the night when the script for them concludes. Why do CMKX/Nevada and CMKX/Tyler have two different Federal Tax I.D.s? Why not just file a change of address? If Tyler were indeed a legitimate mining entity, why would you hire an over-weight, badly groomed, aging hippie and a goof-ball journalist photographed wearing woman's mascara (neither of whom has ANY mining experience) to lead the company? If you believe they are legitimate, I can offer you a fine bridge in Brooklyn for purchase, and I'll discount the price just for you because you are a member of this board - but you must act on this offer today! The list goes on and on, yet the script was written this way given the lack of financial experience of many CMKXers. The bulk of folks were recruited from the NHRA races. These races typically do not draw sophisticated stock traders, but rather, folks who have minimal experience trading securities. Many CMKXers are first time stock purchasers. This was done intentionally, as its part of the orchestrated sting to bring down the shadow financial system. Have you noticed, most CMKXers "react" rather than pro-actively develop unique, stand-alone, substantive questions? Here is a typical post: "Someone should organize a march on Washington - I have had enough!" This type of post takes no responsibility, pounds on the table like a juvenile, and elicits more posts demanding "public hangings", "just shoot them" and more idle banter. Most of these folks will never write their senator or congressman, or protest in front of NASDAQ, like I have. Most will follow the leader, like lemmings do and accept the consequences of following anonymous internet posters, blindly. Tyler has been portrayed as bumbling idiots. I must compliment them, as they are quite convincing! The USG wants the issue of the Naked Shorting of CMKX in the Trillions of shares to go away. Hence, the goofy law suits from Tyler against Edwards, Urban, et al., they do little or nothing for the shareholder base. Make the CMKX management appear incompetent, have Faulk issue his piece of trash novel, have West paint UC as a criminal, when UC has never been charged with a crime, have acca call Faulk and West evil, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. Faulk and acca are likely drinking buddies - this is all a big goofy story using smoke and mirrors. Not one person has ever offered anything persuasive to dissuade my thinking on this position. Have a good day. tramp2.proboards88.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=8021
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Mar 15, 2009 18:14:00 GMT -5
deltadon30228 Diamond Miner Re: gossip 3/15/09 « Reply #7 Today at 11:30am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- KFL, Your absolutely correct, this group of shareholders are not truly a bonded group, we talk a lot of talk but no one gets together and forms unity as in setting up a protest in Washington to draw attention to our cause. We have what 40,000 shareholders? but no unity as far as working together to bring a great outcome for the shareholder, all we do is beotch about the dumba@&es in Tyler or get mad at our government. Why don't we truly make a effort to rally in Washington? Everyone else is, why not FOX news? I don't trust our government or Obama to release any funds to us. They want to get their hands on it to spend with MS. Prada!(Nancy Spendlozi). We need to force the hands of government and bring CMKX to the public like the Madoff circus. FOX would love to be the first to show that Madoff is chump change compared to CMKX. We are sitting on our hands and letting them win. Again why don't we do anything but complain. That has gotten us nowhere. cmkxgroup.proboards88.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=21123
|
|
|
Post by chris on Mar 15, 2009 18:24:12 GMT -5
Sonnerlew; just a suggestion as I know you work very hard. You should pehaps be more selective with which posts you bring her from RB.
|
|
|
Post by johnjrambothe2nd on Mar 15, 2009 19:59:16 GMT -5
Sonnerlew; just a suggestion as I know you work very hard. You should pehaps be more selective with which posts you bring her from RB. Yes please soonerlew, do not bring chris' posts...lol
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Mar 15, 2009 21:50:20 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Mar 15, 2009 21:52:09 GMT -5
Sonnerlew; just a suggestion as I know you work very hard. You should pehaps be more selective with which posts you bring her from RB. :oTo whom are you referring? It's all interesting reading to me. Just because it is posted does not mean that it is endorsed by this board nor by the person who brings it. With that said I will .
|
|
|
Post by speedomodel on Mar 16, 2009 13:15:12 GMT -5
Sooner & Single, i hope you dont mind me adding to this thread but i found this on the raging bull message board. thank you By: bhollenegg 16 Mar 2009, 06:09 AM EDT Rating: post rating 1 Rate this post: Msg. 817500 of 817563 Jump to msg. # Hello Chrisl, I agree not to wait for Attorney Hodges and BHollenegg to do their part in obtaining an official confirmation of the compensation. The Legal Shareholders need to receive clarification from the company on the two questions you submitted as follows… “1. Is the stock certificate that I am holding registered? Provide the company with your cert number. 2. Is the 622 billion unregistered securities that the SEC stated are in the market part of the 703 billion or are they above the 703 billion?" It is imperative for the Legal Shareholders to continue the pressure on the entities that have any influence on the release of the compensation funds required by law for the Legal Shareholders. Many shareholders have sent emails, letters, Faxes, and communicated by telephone to a list of entities provided by the organizers of the blitz campaign. The list includes State and Federal agencies, politicians, and Attorneys …anyone that can influence and put more pressure on the release of compensation funds. I disagree about the Statutes of Limitations that you conveyed “Or wait for Bhollenegg and Al Hodges and then watch the statute of limitations expire.” Attorney Bill Frizzell stated in a correspondence to Attorney Donald Stoecklein concerning CMKM’s situation “The cases which I have found interpreting the relevant statutes do not suggest a specific time period within which to request action.” Additionally,when there is an intentional cover-up, as in the case of providing misinformation from the original incident, the Statute of Limitations does not apply. This happened to me when I was seeking compensation to cover my medical expenses as a result from toxic exposure. The corporate attorney called me and said “You are not authorized to claim workman’s compensation to cover the medical expenses…there are no blood tests that can be used in a court of law that would be accepted as proof in causing my medical condition.” There was. The Statute of Limitations was removed because the corporate attorney, whether intentional or not, provided false information. Thank you, BHollenegg
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 16, 2009 18:04:10 GMT -5
Speedomodel.... Please do post anything you find interesting !! The help would be greatly appreciated !! Thanks for bring this post over!! S ingle
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 16, 2009 18:10:09 GMT -5
Sooner & Single, i hope you dont mind me adding to this thread but i found this on the raging bull message board. thank you By: bhollenegg 16 Mar 2009, 06:09 AM EDT Rating: post rating 1 Rate this post: Msg. 817500 of 817563 Jump to msg. # Hello Chrisl, I agree not to wait for Attorney Hodges and BHollenegg to do their part in obtaining an official confirmation of the compensation. The Legal Shareholders need to receive clarification from the company on the two questions you submitted as follows… “1. Is the stock certificate that I am holding registered? Provide the company with your cert number. 2. Is the 622 billion unregistered securities that the SEC stated are in the market part of the 703 billion or are they above the 703 billion?" It is imperative for the Legal Shareholders to continue the pressure on the entities that have any influence on the release of the compensation funds required by law for the Legal Shareholders. Many shareholders have sent emails, letters, Faxes, and communicated by telephone to a list of entities provided by the organizers of the blitz campaign. The list includes State and Federal agencies, politicians, and Attorneys …anyone that can influence and put more pressure on the release of compensation funds. I disagree about the Statutes of Limitations that you conveyed “Or wait for Bhollenegg and Al Hodges and then watch the statute of limitations expire.” Attorney Bill Frizzell stated in a correspondence to Attorney Donald Stoecklein concerning CMKM’s situation “The cases which I have found interpreting the relevant statutes do not suggest a specific time period within which to request action.” Additionally,when there is an intentional cover-up, as in the case of providing misinformation from the original incident, the Statute of Limitations does not apply. This happened to me when I was seeking compensation to cover my medical expenses as a result from toxic exposure. The corporate attorney called me and said “You are not authorized to claim workman’s compensation to cover the medical expenses…there are no blood tests that can be used in a court of law that would be accepted as proof in causing my medical condition.” There was. The Statute of Limitations was removed because the corporate attorney, whether intentional or not, provided false information. Thank you, BHollenegg By: newtopennies 16 Mar 2009, 09:46 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 817526 of 817586 (Reply to 817500 by bhollenegg) Jump to msg. # BHOLLENEGG...MAYBE that was part of the problem? You know that expression about work expanding without a deadline....just guessing! I believe we are still on the 'Maheu Plan' but no telling how many wrenches have been thrown into the works over the years. Hope this finds you well...eom.
|
|