|
Post by hundredtoone on Mar 27, 2009 19:54:39 GMT -5
Rosencrantz seems to think TYLER has something to do with our CMKX CERTS...they ARE a bunch of LIARS IMO...but they have NOTHING to do with our PAYOUT MONEY I bet...still I would not want to be in their shoes since there are over 50,000 sharteholders getting more fed up by the DAY...they had better HIDE real soon IMO...Flying Moose(cmkxunofficial)
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Mar 27, 2009 20:08:41 GMT -5
gusjarvis King of Diamonds ok it is time to start the action « Thread Started Today at 3:08pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I have been in contact with a cbc reporter who wants to hear the story of the shareholders. I have indicated we are a group who are ready to take rico action if we don't get the answers we deserve. We will see where it goes, and I will update all on any progress. The next step will be done next week and it will be opening a file with the rcmp for the shareholders alliance. tramp2.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=8128
|
|
|
Post by chris on Mar 27, 2009 20:20:59 GMT -5
About time to take action, as we've been ripped off years ago. Finally some have woken up to the fact that there is no payout on the horizon!
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 27, 2009 22:10:55 GMT -5
Posted by: IQ1 Date: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 9:56:26 AM In reply to: uber darthium who wrote msg# 269511 Post # of 269592 Stupidity is having darthium for a name now back to CMKX... What ever happened to ... Yellow River mining in Equador. As RW described it, USCA's role was to process ore...and the operation was generating revenue. Apparently Yellow River is owned 100% by USCA; CMKX owns the shafts and claims, USCA processes the ore and is responsible for selling the minerals. CMKX gets 50% of the haul. Most of the revenues generated to date have been put back into the mine operations. Processed approx $90-120K (gross) in 2004, 50% of which was paid to CMKX. RW receives weekly reports from So. America. ?? Posted by: uber darthium Date: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 12:45:27 PM In reply to: IQ1 who wrote msg# 269517 Post # of 269592 Abadgoodgirl, USCA doesn't exist except for some tables and chairs. Remember, some shareholder went to their office and it was a scam. Posted by: TSXminer Date: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 1:39:29 PM In reply to: uber darthium who wrote msg# 269575 Post # of 269592 That's not true! They also have a coffee-maker. No wait...Rendall stole that from a Motel 8. USCA doesn't exist except for some tables and chairs. Posted by: uber darthium Date: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 2:02:38 PM In reply to: TSXminer who wrote msg# 269577 Post # of 269592 No, I just called a friend who knew who went and was told plastic tables, chairs, a filing cabinet, plastic filing boxes on the floor, and a couple of binders on the table as "business records". I am told there was a computer, fax, and single line telephone. So much for USCA. This is probably what we would find if someone were to visit the "official" offices fo CMKM Diamonds, Inc. of Tyler, Texas. Oh Sooonnerrrr !! I think you can tell us what frizzell's office looks like... Pleaseeeee??? Actually it is a very nice office considering it is a renovated older house. Much better than what I saw in the bank building. Well except for the law offices there and they were nice. Where KW was working tho wasn't much. So they have stepped up in this new office. It was much more than a fax machine, etc. The furniture was nice and BF had his own office as did Goldie. The first room you enter serves as the conference room with a big table that would seat 10 to 12 people. The chairs were comfortable and I would know after sitting in one of them for about four hours. I would have to say it is a legitimate office. Thanks Sooner.......
|
|
|
Post by squeezebox on Mar 27, 2009 22:14:27 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 27, 2009 22:31:20 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by chris on Mar 28, 2009 10:30:47 GMT -5
Not much going on anymore
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 28, 2009 11:25:39 GMT -5
oh well.... at least he has a different line this time......By: lilburrito0 27 Mar 2009, 09:49 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 820325 of 820335 The monkeys bananas are about to get split By: rosencrantz2010 27 Mar 2009, 11:46 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 820347 of 820399 (Reply to 820325 by lilburrito0) Jump to msg. # lilburrito, you've been promising us that URBAN would be charged, arrested and in JAIL over FOUR YEARS AGO! LOL come on, man, don't you have better sources? LOL you're blowing smoke. you've been laying out the same lamo threat for years and you're no better than the other side that's been promising riches. bring it on! who cares if the man goes down in flames after this long. the problem is, you're just as much a lying ######## as every other loser on this board promising this or that and when it comes down to the end line you end up being just as much of a pu%#@# as all the rest. lilburrto, the man with the KING size PU@#%%. promises, promises. BWAHAHAAAAAAAAA
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 28, 2009 11:34:12 GMT -5
By: rosencrantz2010 28 Mar 2009, 08:19 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 820364 of 820400
Jump to msg. # Convo w/ Anthony M Santos, Esq.....ShowMeTheMoney « Thread Started Yesterday at 9:36pm »
By: gusjarvis 28 Mar 2009, 11:23 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 820385 of 820400 (Reply to 820364 by rosencrantz2010)
Jump to msg. # rosen the problem with that convo is what about
the massive massive amount of stock sold before the share raises, and what about the fact the sec had the proof of the scam in sept 04 before the party. And what about the fact that bill frizzell and everyone on the boards knew roger did those letter in early 05 and he knew the silver state bank fraud in early 05 as it was in his nasd complaint letter, he just left out urban's name despite knowing the evidence then worked with him and said nothing but good things for years
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 28, 2009 11:38:59 GMT -5
By: aladin99 28 Mar 2009, 02:44 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 820362 of 820401
Jump to msg. # SEC does not tell us the truth... if 622B is part of the 703B, JE sold 259B Unregistered shares then who else sold the other 363B Unregistered shares. Why SEC did not have or show any data on this?
We should ask Leslie (Less lies, more lies) to show us the following data: 1. How Jeffries covered his 111B long sales 2. Who sold 363B Unregistered shares beside John Edwards
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 28, 2009 11:58:54 GMT -5
from the kitchen.....
Is there ANYthing Tyler could say that « Thread Started Today at 7:45pm »
would make you happy?
I'm curious of what would make the toughest CMKM critics on the planet happy.
Anything? --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
And I need something more...to keep on breathing for...
scottbro2 Matey
Re: Is there ANYthing Tyler could say that « Reply #1 Today at 8:25pm »
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- That is easy. Either of these would make me extremely happy. *and would help me support Bill and Kevin and Mark fully.
1. Here are the names of the board of directors of cmkx. 2. Here are the names of the people "funding" cmkx and the arrangement for payment we have with them. 3. Here is how we were able to make executive decisions such as moving to texas and hiring a ceo without needing shareholder approval: 4. This is our plan of action to bring value back to cmkx shareholders *specific goals and action items 5. Explain why Urban Casavant has not been indicted and why they are not pursuing him. **A blind, one legged monkey could find Urban and sue him quicker than our "team" Scottbro2
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 28, 2009 12:38:38 GMT -5
Roger Glenn July 19, 2006 (188 pages); October 23, 2007 (197 pages).all those pages to say... I looked over the documents and everything was ok??Posted by: Pedro2004 Date: Saturday, March 28, 2009 9:42:30 AM In reply to: h24ever who wrote msg# 269800 Post # of 269806 If you go back through the CMKM website and SEC lawsuit documents you'll see the extent Roger Glenn was involved. Nevwest was asking the SEC and FIRNA for direction on the continued dumping of shares. Nevwest questioned Bagley on the validity of the source documents used/required to issue a (new) certificate. Bagley started asking questions too! That's where Roger Glenn came in-- He was used to look over the documents to make sure the "CMKM Board Minutes and Dvorak opinion letters" were in compliance. Roger Glenn did not write any opinion letters to make the shares "free trading." He wrote the "everything's a-okay" letters to tell everyone that -- Brian Dvorak's opinion letters and Urban's CMKM Board Resolutions -- were "compliant." hat's why the SEC did not go after Roger Glenn in the civil lawsuit! SEC knew in 2003 ?? and allowed 2004 & 2005 to happen?? Even after a temporary halt and allowed to resume trading?? Posted by: Pedro2004 Date: Saturday, March 28, 2009 10:07:05 AM In reply to: janice shell who wrote msg# 269788 Post # of 269806 They SEC knew something was wrong back in May 2003. www.cmkmdiamondsinc.com/justice/sec_ltr_bagley_5-26-04.pdfJames Kinney was one of the people Edwards/Urban funneled the certifiates: Kinney then dumped them. www.cmkmdiamondsinc.com/documents/kinney-may-2004-amtd-sample.pdf
|
|
|
Post by squeezebox on Mar 28, 2009 14:49:48 GMT -5
Here's something interesting on our corrupt financial system. It has Jap/Chineese also so scroll through to the english parts. It has a section about disinformation which can be applied all over the place in cmkx land. benjaminfulford.typepad.com/benjaminfulford/
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 28, 2009 18:31:59 GMT -5
Here's something interesting on our corrupt financial system. It has Jap/Chineese also so scroll through to the english parts. It has a section about disinformation which can be applied all over the place in cmkx land. benjaminfulford.typepad.com/benjaminfulford/here it is.... How to neutralize illuminati disinformation agents on the internetThere are plenty of government and illuminati agents whose job is to manipulate information on the internet. They are fairly easy to spot because they have only a few tools at their disposal: insults, lies and lies mixed with truth. Insults are their favorite trick. For example if someone writes “911 was an inside job” they will not argue the evidence based on facts but will say “that person is an conspiracy nut.” You can reply to them “that is an ad hominen attack (an insult)” and not a debate based on evidence. Disinformation agents hate to debate on facts because they know they will lose. The best technique they have for lies is to attack straw men. For example when I asked NSA Admiral Bobby Inman about the privately owned Federal Reserve he said “are you one of those UFO nuts?” He was both insulting me and attributing a belief to me I did not state so he used both ad hominen and straw man techniques but avoided facts. The mixing of disinformation with real information is the hardest technique to beat but it is still easily beatable. What you need to do is see how much you can confirm from other sources. For example if someone says “911 was an inside job that was carried out by reptilians,” well you can find mountains of evidence about 911 but the reptilian thing can all be traced to a couple of sources who have not provided any evidence other than testimony. Extra-ordinary claims require extra-ordinary proof and that has not been provided in this case. In fact, I have personally met several of the people who are called reptilian and one of them even admitted to me it was just a metaphor. So let us root out all the insulting liars from the internet by ignoring any posters who insult, tell lies and mix truth with lies. Also if we write something that turns out to be false, we must issue corrections so that we cannot be accused of being liars ourselves.
|
|
|
Post by chris on Mar 28, 2009 18:40:47 GMT -5
Dead board and getting deader every day!
|
|