|
Post by soonerlew on Jul 5, 2008 20:06:21 GMT -5
B68 DIAMOND DIGGER Re: Pal Talk rumors « Reply #25 Today at 5:03pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Today at 4:40pm, abadgoodgirl wrote: How about the Dutch?? The Dutch bank is more involved with American companies than most could imagine... A former employer of mine was bought out by a very well known Dutch owned company that most here use every day..... DHL !! for those of you that didn't know. DHL is owned by the Dutch Post, in which is owned by the Dutch Bank. Back in 2000-01 I was employed by AEI in which was bought by Danzas in which was in bed with the Dutch and ultimately bought by DHL.. Yet this was after the Dutch tried buying FEDEX, but couldn't because of the GOV. MONOPOLY!! FEDEX is tied into the US Postal Serv. so if the Dutch where to buy FEDEX, well then they would own part of the US Postal services... Om my... That same year they also tried buy out UPS- I had a few phone conversations with some higher ups in both FEDEX & UPS and as upper management, we all were wondering what was going on..... Ultimately DHL was the final face of the buy outs including the purchase of Luftanza Airlines to mention one more.....I'm sure by now there are a few more big American related names that most are not aware... How big is the Dutch banks accounts? millionaires.proboards86.com/inde....ad=20811&page=2
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jul 6, 2008 8:22:15 GMT -5
Oil.Ipo. DIAMOND MINER Re: Pal Talk rumors « Reply #44 Today at 7:29am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I wonder what those packets are gonna look like when they finally arrive? 1.) Tattered 2.) wind swept, and dirty, and water stained? 3.) opened, closed, opened ,closed, opened, closed, repacked for time sensitivity?(lol) 4.) Will they smell musty? 5.) Do they recalculate the interest at point of origin to be fair? Those dang "delays". 6.) Do insiders still get the same forthcoming? After all they were paid 2 years ago?Oil millionaires.proboards86.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=20811&page=3
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jul 6, 2008 8:24:44 GMT -5
TheRealJBond DIAMOND MINER Re: 3000 trusts « Reply #36 Yesterday at 11:32pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WODAN..You don't listen to rumors...You make me laugh...You only start your own rumors and we are to believe them right....You are such a JOKE..>FLIP FLOP FLIP FLOP....LOL Come on my friend isnt your game up yet? You are so transparent. I am bashed if I dont have links to information (which by the way mine is ONLY FACTUAL...I do not perdict dates, times, amounts etc.) and I am NO GURU...I only bring data to light on what we are doing to make certain we get paid....Try this ACTION POLICY some time..>WE COULD REALLY USE YOUR ACTIONS instead of JUST WORDS...Maybe I do not know the actions you are taking in your country, I will be the first to admit that...but try joining in with the others of us who are of the mind that THIS IS OUR COMPANY and the only way to get REACTIONS are to TAKE ACTION. millionaires.proboards86.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=20749&page=2
|
|
|
Post by Catdaddy on Jul 6, 2008 8:27:05 GMT -5
Oil.Ipo. DIAMOND MINER Re: Pal Talk rumors « Reply #44 Today at 7:29am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I wonder what those packets are gonna look like when they finally arrive? 1.) Tattered 2.) wind swept, and dirty, and water stained? 3.) opened, closed, opened ,closed, opened, closed, repacked for time sensitivity?(lol) 4.) Will they smell musty? 5.) Do they recalculate the interest at point of origin to be fair? Those dang "delays". 6.) Do insiders still get the same forthcoming? After all they were paid 2 years ago?Oil millionaires.proboards86.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=20811&page=3Oil/Sooner, I don't care if the packets have been dipped in shi* and left out in the sun to dry. If there are packets with funds inside addressed to us...send them on and in any condition. ;D Later, Catdaddy
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jul 6, 2008 8:28:13 GMT -5
dicek18 Junior Miner Re: last from belgium « Reply #8 Today at 3:40am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Wodan, your dates are laughable. Why Nov 2009? Why not Nov 2008? July 2008? How about Aug 2008? No? Aug 2009? It's going to be Nov 2009? Really? Why? Oh, I forgot - you don't give explanations. You just throw dates out there - that you make up - and expect that people will believe you. You might not realize it, but people who believed you 2 years ago, no longer believe your stuff and require a little more proof than you simply throwing a date out there tramp2.proboards88.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=5455
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jul 6, 2008 8:39:55 GMT -5
Mathias1 Maggot Moderator Re: Important ! Rule 1101 and 1102 - Fair Funds A « Reply #7 Today at 9:31am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I think some people are assuming that Frizzell can take the Edwards' settlement money from the SEC based on the ruling of a civil case. I strongly disagree. They are two separate actions. Not to mention, Edwards settled with the SEC before the civil judgment was signed. Any disgorgement, if that happens, would go to the shareholders. Not to satisfy an unrelated civil case or to pay company debts owed by and to company management. Frizzell is on his own. « Last Edit: Today at 9:33am by Mathias1 » cmkxclubhouse.proboards76.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=2092
|
|
|
Post by hundredtoone on Jul 6, 2008 8:49:12 GMT -5
Not only do MANY not BELIEVE the GURUS...MANY also BELIEVE the GURUS are working for the DARK SIDE...you GURUS should think about that sometime...giving DATES and PROMISES then FAILING TO DELIVER (like the TWINS) (and the TEAM so far) does nothing but alienate any supporters and FRIENDS you might have had once...so the longer we go on the LESS effective your techniques get and the more resistance you generate (which is not entierly bad) you HAVE created a lot of conditioned shareholders that BELIEVE NO ONE anymore...THAT IS GOOD IMO...but if I were a GURU...I would keep my mouth SHUT until I was POSITIVE my message would actually come to pass...GURUS and BASHERS are USELESS now much like what the TWINS SAY...the only thing that will be REAL to most shareholders now is that ROI in our hands IMO ...Flying Moose(cmkxunofficial)
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jul 6, 2008 8:49:49 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jul 6, 2008 9:23:42 GMT -5
By: smartmoneyknows 06 Jul 2008, 04:13 AM EDT Msg. 739536 of 739587 Jump to msg. # PinkDiamond4me: But.........Someone had to BUY my cert!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! nebraska rebel_1: true PinkDiamond4me: And that is a fact!!!!!
FACT? WHERE'S THE PROOF???
ONE SHOULDN'T SAY FACT WHEN YOU CAN'T BACK IT UP..
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jul 6, 2008 9:28:08 GMT -5
By: rosencrantz2010 05 Jul 2008, 08:05 PM EDT Msg. 739527 of 739587 Jump to msg. # who are these people complaining about cmkx investors? why are they going to such lengths to poke fun at the people that bought $1,000, $10,000, and, in some cases, maybe much more than that of cmkx stock?
what is their concern? why are they so worked up over individuals continuing to hope their modest investment in cmkx will pan out? why are they upset other people could have been wronged in their investment?
if my mother had invested in what to me was a scam stock, i would say, "mom, you know you got ripped off. your money is gone." and she would say, "i don't care. i'm still hoping i make some money." i would argue back, "mom, don't be delusional. you're not going to see a penny from that investment." but after that back-and-forth with her i'd stop saying anything because the deed would have been done and there would be nothing she or i could do about it. i would simply shut my mouth and move on to other topics. why rub it in? why hurt here feelings?
but there seems to be a core group of individuals that have persisted in bringing up the idea that cmkx investors have been scammed. and what's weird is these same people have made this same point for over four (4) years. can you believe it? would you keep telling your mother she was stupid and had been scammed out of her money for over four (4) years? i doubt it.
the persistence of these individuals suggests something else is going on here. it suggests there may be smaller investment firms that could be facing a naked short (which they hold). and once cmkx returns to trading they need to haver as few investors as possible in that market buying and as many as possible selling in order that their firm pays as little as possible to buy back shares of cmkx they sold illegally. it's just an idea that others have talked about for years but it is starting to make more sense the longer these people work the boards. and there are people working the boards, make no mistake about it. there are individuals that have a vested interest in seeing cmkx sold. if i were them i'd be doing the same thing. i'd want as many people as possible to sell as many of their shares of cmkx as they have. it's pretty clear.
and that, my friends, is a VERY GOOD SIGN for ALL CMKX INVESTORS.
so, the more you read this endless craap from these individuals the more likely it is that they want all of us to dump our shares as quickly as possible once cmkx begin trading again. my advice would be, hold,,,, and see what the market will pay you after a week, a month or maybe longer.
By: joesixpack333 05 Jul 2008, 09:48 PM EDT Msg. 739532 of 739588 (This msg. is a reply to 739527 by rosencrantz2010.) Jump to msg. # rosen.. they are the glue that keep us here..
and they also provide the much needed entertainment.. ROFL
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 6, 2008 14:40:39 GMT -5
By: gotoil1870 05 Jul 2008, 06:02 PM EDT Msg. 739505 of 739730Jump to msg. # MULTIPLE STREAMS OF INCOME!!! « Thread Started on Jun 29, 2005, 7:45pm » ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKI&read=739505By: rosencrantz2010 06 Jul 2008, 07:25 AM EDT Msg. 739538 of 739730(This msg. is a reply to 739505 by gotoil1870.) Jump to msg. # gotoil1870, i wonder what this person would have said if he had been told when he wrote this piece that THREE years later we would be sitting around still wondering if anything is going to happen and still developing theories of what took place. exciting ideas but the power of those ideas is diminished by the fact that the trigger was never pulled. there is an implied threat of action on CMKX's part. that is, trapping shorting and making him pay dividends or royalties forever on the naked short. well, CMKX never did that. too bad, because it's an appealing idea. three years. i wonder what has really gone on behind the scenes all this time?
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 6, 2008 14:43:38 GMT -5
gotta luv Rosencrantz's Sarcasm.... By: rosencrantz2010 06 Jul 2008, 08:30 AM EDT Msg. 739548 of 739730Jump to msg. # fortunately no other company bought into the board hype from 2004 and got tricked into picking up all those worthless CMKX claims in the FALC. By: rosencrantz2010 06 Jul 2008, 08:34 AM EDT Msg. 739551 of 739730Jump to msg. # as jonas would say, Project Surround was part of the scam. all of the claims urban had picked up and included in the 1.9 million acre Project Surround story were nothing more than worthless moose pasture. imagine, all of that property included in Project Surround was worthless moose pasture. the evidence of that land being worthless? well, the best evidence is that no other mining company has reclaimed that land. all of that moose pasture to this day goes unclaimed. no one wants it. no one. LOL By: StoneRolling 06 Jul 2008, 08:37 AM EDT Msg. 739552 of 739730(This msg. is a reply to 739551 by rosencrantz2010.) Jump to msg. # rosen: Virtually everything that went to Entourage was allowed to lapse. That should tell people something right there. By: rosencrantz2010 06 Jul 2008, 08:44 AM EDT Msg. 739554 of 739730(This msg. is a reply to 739552 by StoneRolling.) Jump to msg. # stone, you're right. all of that land urban had staked in Project Surround is worthless. no one would want it. no one! i bet you couldn't find more than 100 acres of that Project Surround land that's been re-claimed. and i doubt that any of the land that ENTOURAGE let go was picked up by SHORE or and of the other players in the FALC. IT'S A FACT! THAT LAND URBAN HAD WAS ALL WORTHLESS MOOSE PASTURE. all you have to do is look at the current claims map to see that no one is interested in it. By: StoneRolling 06 Jul 2008, 09:01 AM EDT Msg. 739561 of 739730(This msg. is a reply to 739556 by rosencrantz2010.) Jump to msg. # rosen: I don't have to look at the map. I believe that it is all worthless. - - - - - By: rosencrantz2010 06 Jul 2008, 09:10 AM EDT Msg. 739564 of 739730(This msg. is a reply to 739561 by StoneRolling.) Jump to msg. # stone, is that how you gather proof for your case, you base it on what you believe? you should look at the most recent claims map so you can see that all of the FALC is now unclaimed land. the easiest way to see if something is unclaimed is it is colored white. most of the FALC is now white on the claims map. right? since you believe that then you have nothing to fear by looking at the most recent claims map. www.shaneresources.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=19&Itemid=32 remember, all of the old CMKX land is now unclaimed. and the reason it's unclaimed (and white) is because it's worthless moose pasture, and it always was worthless. no mining company worth its salt would re-claim that old CMKX land, right? By: StoneRolling 06 Jul 2008, 09:28 AM EDT Msg. 739568 of 739731(This msg. is a reply to 739564 by rosencrantz2010.) Jump to msg. # rosen: I base it on the FACT that many scams and mining companies have caused investors to dump vast amounts of money into that area for YEARS with no results...only mounting investor losses. I don't care what the map says. History tells the story. By: rosencrantz2010 06 Jul 2008, 09:30 AM EDT Msg. 739569 of 739731(This msg. is a reply to 739568 by StoneRolling.) Jump to msg. # stone, good to see you are a man of faith! facts be d*mned! By: rosencrantz2010 06 Jul 2008, 04:06 PM EDT Msg. 739733 of 739736Jump to msg. # FALC MAPS: OCT. '03 & JULY '08 October, 2003: adamhull.com/files/17x11_Oct03.pdf July, 2008: www.uniteduranium.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=19&Itemid=32
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 6, 2008 14:51:55 GMT -5
errrr..... even Bill Frizzell & Kevin West??...... "Trillions NSS handed to us on a silver platter"?? (never to be refuted)..... and ...Al Hodges( CMKM Attorney, more recent comment to the SEC) ?? "The largest NSS in the history of the stock market"??.....By: StoneRolling 06 Jul 2008, 08:33 AM EDT Msg. 739550 of 739730(This msg. is a reply to 739542 by rented_mule.) Jump to msg. # rented: It all started IMO with that early PR, in which Urban listed all those MMs and brokers and suggested the stock was being shorted. It was all a ploy to cover up the massive, earth-shattering dilution. But, you are right. Many fell for it, and accepted it as truth. It's been discussed so much that even after Urban is exposed as a crook and the O/S has been revealed, people STILL believe it.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 6, 2008 15:12:21 GMT -5
gotta luv Rosencrantz's Sarcasm.... By: rosencrantz2010 06 Jul 2008, 08:30 AM EDT Msg. 739548 of 739730Jump to msg. # fortunately no other company bought into the board hype from 2004 and got tricked into picking up all those worthless CMKX claims in the FALC. By: rosencrantz2010 06 Jul 2008, 08:34 AM EDT Msg. 739551 of 739730Jump to msg. # as jonas would say, Project Surround was part of the scam. all of the claims urban had picked up and included in the 1.9 million acre Project Surround story were nothing more than worthless moose pasture. imagine, all of that property included in Project Surround was worthless moose pasture. the evidence of that land being worthless? well, the best evidence is that no other mining company has reclaimed that land. all of that moose pasture to this day goes unclaimed. no one wants it. no one. LOL By: StoneRolling 06 Jul 2008, 08:37 AM EDT Msg. 739552 of 739730(This msg. is a reply to 739551 by rosencrantz2010.) Jump to msg. # rosen: Virtually everything that went to Entourage was allowed to lapse. That should tell people something right there. By: rosencrantz2010 06 Jul 2008, 08:44 AM EDT Msg. 739554 of 739730(This msg. is a reply to 739552 by StoneRolling.) Jump to msg. # stone, you're right. all of that land urban had staked in Project Surround is worthless. no one would want it. no one! i bet you couldn't find more than 100 acres of that Project Surround land that's been re-claimed. and i doubt that any of the land that ENTOURAGE let go was picked up by SHORE or and of the other players in the FALC. IT'S A FACT! THAT LAND URBAN HAD WAS ALL WORTHLESS MOOSE PASTURE. all you have to do is look at the current claims map to see that no one is interested in it. By: StoneRolling 06 Jul 2008, 09:01 AM EDT Msg. 739561 of 739730(This msg. is a reply to 739556 by rosencrantz2010.) Jump to msg. # rosen: I don't have to look at the map. I believe that it is all worthless. - - - - - By: rosencrantz2010 06 Jul 2008, 09:10 AM EDT Msg. 739564 of 739730(This msg. is a reply to 739561 by StoneRolling.) Jump to msg. # stone, is that how you gather proof for your case, you base it on what you believe? you should look at the most recent claims map so you can see that all of the FALC is now unclaimed land. the easiest way to see if something is unclaimed is it is colored white. most of the FALC is now white on the claims map. right? since you believe that then you have nothing to fear by looking at the most recent claims map. www.shaneresources.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=19&Itemid=32 remember, all of the old CMKX land is now unclaimed. and the reason it's unclaimed (and white) is because it's worthless moose pasture, and it always was worthless. no mining company worth its salt would re-claim that old CMKX land, right? By: StoneRolling 06 Jul 2008, 09:28 AM EDT Msg. 739568 of 739731(This msg. is a reply to 739564 by rosencrantz2010.) Jump to msg. # rosen: I base it on the FACT that many scams and mining companies have caused investors to dump vast amounts of money into that area for YEARS with no results...only mounting investor losses. I don't care what the map says. History tells the story. By: rosencrantz2010 06 Jul 2008, 09:30 AM EDT Msg. 739569 of 739731(This msg. is a reply to 739568 by StoneRolling.) Jump to msg. # stone, good to see you are a man of faith! facts be d*mned! By: StoneRolling 06 Jul 2008, 09:36 AM EDT Msg. 739574 of 739733(This msg. is a reply to 739569 by rosencrantz2010.) Jump to msg. # rose: I think YOU are the one taking a leap of faith by relying on a map. Remember, CMKX once touted a very similar map. History bears out the worthlessness of those claims. History proves that the area is nothing more than a black hole from which no investment dollar can escape. By: rosencrantz2010 06 Jul 2008, 09:39 AM EDT Msg. 739575 of 739733(This msg. is a reply to 739574 by StoneRolling.) Jump to msg. # stone, you better tell that to the Saskatchewan government since it is their claims map. lol By: StoneRolling 06 Jul 2008, 09:42 AM EDT Msg. 739577 of 739733(This msg. is a reply to 739575 by rosencrantz2010.) Jump to msg. # rosen: Not saying the claims map is some kind of fraud. The claims are there and can be staked. However, you can't say the claims are valuable just because they are staked. CMKX touted the SAME map. Look how that turned out. Keep reading maps and ignoring the history of the area. It's not moose pasture...it's a money pit. By: rosencrantz2010 06 Jul 2008, 09:47 AM EDT Msg. 739579 of 739733(This msg. is a reply to 739577 by StoneRolling.) Jump to msg. # stone, it's going to be a money pit alright,,, SHORE/NEWMONT are planning an open pit by 2010/2011. but what SHORE plans to do all by itself with the rest of the FALC is a mystery. why claim worthless moose pasture? and why trade big blocks of worthless claims with SHANE RESOURCES and with STAR URANIUM? why go to the expense? why waste time on flat moose land? is moose poop really that valuable?
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 6, 2008 15:18:39 GMT -5
By: cmkmlegal 06 Jul 2008, 10:49 AM EDT Msg. 739597 of 739733 Jump to msg. # Dear Shareholders,
It is very important that each one of you read this post and pass it post around. With the recent events that have transpired with the company being awarded a judgment of $33 million dollars against John Edwards each one of you should contact an attorney and learn what your rights are.
The company has not provided any information on what the plans are with this money if the funds are ever collected. The company has not provided how they have been able to function financially for the past 2 years without any revenue being generated. The company has not provided tax returns for the investors of this company.
Since this company is a private company if you the shareholder do not lay claim to funds that might be collected you will lose. The company in a sense is private and they can do what they want with any funds collected without any approval from shareholders. They do not have any kind of board to determine how the monies will be collected and used. This money can disappear as fast as it appears and you the shareholders will no legal right to it.
Do not wait to contact an attorney do it now. Consider the people that you might talk to on the boards as your enemy as some of them are here to persuade you not to take any legal action against various parties.
The funds are yours regardless of what the company states.
By: cmkmlegal 06 Jul 2008, 11:10 AM EDT Msg. 739605 of 739734 Jump to msg. # Shareholders why hasn't the company filed any corporate tax returns? Why have they kept the finanicals so private from the investors? If this company were still considered a public company we as investors would have a right to view this information.
The company cannot hide the documents from the courts as they are available thru various government websites. But the company is conveniently avoiding a update on the recent events.
Do yourself a favor contact an attorney tomorrow then contact the company and demand answers. But only after you speak to an attorney.
Corporate Law states a company has to file tax returns regardless of revenue. Is the reason the company has avoided tax returns due to they would have to release where loans originated from? How these loans are being paid back and what kind of interest the loans are accruing?
When the funds are eventually collected how much will be paid out to attorneys, support staff and CEO?
What if John Edwards settles for less than the judgement and the company accepts it? As a private company they can do whatever they want.
Learn what your rights are now.
|
|