|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 14, 2008 8:26:29 GMT -5
By: aladin99 13 Sep 2008, 11:09 PM EDT Msg. 764883 of 764922 Jump to msg. # Short message - Posted by: lesco Date: Saturday, September 13, 2008 7:25:43 PM In reply to: puppydotcom who wrote msg# 259203 Post # of 259209
If you listen to the basher, you'll get just as depressed as them and go to bed each night kickn you fat butt for not buying any shares.
Why else would you spend hours over hours waisting you precious time bashing a revocked stock.
Me too, i'd feel like a big kaka if I hadn't bought any CMKX, this is the most talked about revoked stock In the history of the stock market.
Why go to so much trouble for a revoked stock ?
Why would people spend so much time posting here if they don't have any stock ?
You gotta have a pretty boring life to spend all you time here and not own any stock, don't you agree, especially after 5 years.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 14, 2008 8:28:18 GMT -5
By: aladin99 14 Sep 2008, 12:34 AM EDT Msg. 764905 of 764922 Jump to msg. # Don't forget that Dr.Glenn was the SEC attorney and U can bet he has a lot of good friends in the SEC department and you know how our government works...
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 14, 2008 8:31:00 GMT -5
By: sully47 14 Sep 2008, 08:27 AM EDT Msg. 764920 of 764922 Jump to msg. # trixijude....that's because...
the ns has been taken care of and the old CMKX has the money. The NEW CMKM is mopping up and will trade again! JMHO!
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 14, 2008 8:32:24 GMT -5
Posted by: jb1967lbk Date: Saturday, September 13, 2008 10:40:56 PM In reply to: jimmym4 who wrote msg# 259205 Post # of 259239
Nobody stole anything from Urban, Jimmy. If anything, it would appear that it was Urban who had done a lot of stealing himself. Even Mark Faulk seems to have accepted this fact by now and we all know he's an idiot bent on milking the old CMKM Diamonds shareholder base for whatever chump change he can shake out of them.
As for naked short selling, it's not an act of theft, Jimmy. It's an act of portfolio management. If I'm right, I win; if I'm wrong I lose. Life goes on. Either way, I'm just on the sidelines. I'm not the one who kills these companies.
Posted by: janice shell Date: Saturday, September 13, 2008 11:23:33 PM In reply to: jimmym4 who wrote msg# 259214 Post # of 259239
Huh? Why should shorts want to "kill" any company? If it dies, they'll never be able to make any money on it again.
Posted by: oreodiamonds Date: Sunday, September 14, 2008 2:07:54 AM In reply to: janice shell who wrote msg# 259212 Post # of 259239
Actually that happened already when the Feds called 17 banks on June 8th on the red carpet and brought them literally to their knees!
Get ready for a huge problem in the stock market which will cause a domino effect.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 14, 2008 8:33:55 GMT -5
Posted by: rics1997 Date: Saturday, September 13, 2008 11:43:34 PM In reply to: jimmym4 who wrote msg# 259214 Post # of 259239 Thats ridiculous. Shorts don't effect a company, that is just plain non sense. Bad management does and if Patrick would try half as hard to make a profit as he does on NS he could stop shorting.Bbecause the way to stop shorts is to run a good business. Never could figure out why people ignore Overstocks bottom line. Their financials are nasty and have been since they began. But hey, he fights the cause so he doesn't have to run a good company as long as he says what people want to here. Ever notice that only CEO's that run crappy companies tell their shareholders that shorts are hurting them yet never take responsibility for their poor preformance while great CEO's never complain about shorts and Warren Buffett even stated he wouldn't care if they shorted or naked shorted his company because he knows that a good company that makes a profit will destroy any short. All Patrick has to do to stop his company from being shorted is real simple. Do a better job at running it and make a profit for once in the company's life. Posted by: h24ever Date: Sunday, September 14, 2008 7:41:26 AM In reply to: rics1997 who wrote msg# 259217 Post # of 259239 "Shorts don't effect a company" . Please tell me you were partying last nite!!
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 14, 2008 8:34:45 GMT -5
Posted by: pantherj Date: Sunday, September 14, 2008 1:11:24 AM In reply to: IQ1 who wrote msg# 259189 Post # of 259239
Spare me the rah, rah nonsense, IQ. Absolutely nothing will come of this. The entire management gang has not one whit of business experience. The board is stacked with stooges & lackeys who don't even have a passing acquaintance with reality.
They're led by a COB who is as befuddled today as he was two years ago and a COE who was incapable of figuring out this was a scam until years after Janice & other bashers had already done so. Then your glorious CEO, Mark "The Faulking Idiot" wants to take credit for what others had already done. That alone makes him, in my book, devious, untrustworthy and clearly out only for himself. If you want to be associated with that type of person, thats your choice. but, don't expect me to join your pubescent cheer leading squad. He is, IMO, a con artist quite willing to live off the backs of others.
Oh, and BTW, Frizzy has no evidence whatsoever. If he had it, he would have used it by now. Why let the trail grow cold when you can sue somebody with deep pockets, right here in the USA? Plus, it seems Frizzy never sues anyone who will fight him. Its always easier to win judgments from people who couldn't care less, have no intention of putting up a defense because they are outside the U.S. and have absolutely no intention of ever paying a nickle. Get a clue!!
Do you not understand the significance of this it shows CMKX's next move. Wake up and smell the coffee!!!!!!!!!!
Bill Frizzell has enough evidence now to prove NSS and its what he has been telling me all along but I just kept believing the bashers, how sad is that.
|
|
|
Post by hundredtoone on Sept 14, 2008 8:37:59 GMT -5
If the company is KILLED the FTDs need not be DELIVERED and SO the STINKIN SHORTERS and their HELPERS like Janice do not PAY ANYTHING...INCLLUDING TAXES...THAT is why they try to KILL...just like BEHR STERNS and LEHMAN...too big to KILL...NO...not for HOGS...really can you think of ONE good reason that BASHERS would stay on our AZZ for 5 years for NOTHING...out of the goodness of their hearts???...WHAT HEARTS???...they have ICE CUBES as hearts anyway...Flying Moose(cmkxunofficial)
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 14, 2008 8:38:21 GMT -5
Posted by: IQ1 Date: Sunday, September 14, 2008 8:32:08 AM In reply to: pontalba who wrote msg# 259120 Post # of 259239
Computer data can be manipulated why else would it take them so long to caugh it up. Since its on a computer it should not take them over 1 hour to do a query on CMKX since the first day it began trading and caugh it up.
Its just as simple as typing in a couple lines of SQL. Believe me I know I'm a certified DBA as well.
I'm betting what concerns them is the fact that Bill has his hands on a bunch of faxed Certs and I'm sure there are way more that came through than the TA should have issued and in addition to that there is be discrepencies in Bills data compared to the data that was provided. This is sufficient grounds to request an investigation why the records are being falsified. I think someone has a big problem heading their way. You could call it a STORM considering that a company like CMKX would be so silent for this long. It should concern the LARD near the top what Bill has found because soon with our new armed legal attorneys we will be going public with information that could be devastating to the future of the stockmarket. Even the smallest discrepancy is going to look bad...very very bad... These organizations are going to blame the little guy... or another computer glitch but at that point we will be going over the records with a fine toothpick.
I'm sure its going to be FUN !!!
Posted by: IQ1 Date: Sunday, September 14, 2008 8:42:16 AM In reply to: pontalba who wrote msg# 259128 Post # of 259239
Lets assume the DTCC tape is correct, how difficult is it to omit certain transactions just enough to make things look good. Secondly what was that bull the SEC was using initially that they could not provide all the datum on CMKX due to National Security... it the president of the United States one of our shareholders... ha ha ha
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 14, 2008 8:39:20 GMT -5
Posted by: jimmym4 Date: Sunday, September 14, 2008 9:01:16 AM In reply to: pantherj who wrote msg# 259218 Post # of 259239 Why let the trail grow cold when you can sue somebody with deep pockets, right here in the USA? Because urbie, john, and the crew ARE NOT the REAL target?
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 14, 2008 8:40:08 GMT -5
Posted by: jimmym4 Date: Sunday, September 14, 2008 9:03:44 AM In reply to: pantherj who wrote msg# 259220 Post # of 259239
Urban was only part of it..the dragster was pure genius thanks IBM
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 14, 2008 8:41:17 GMT -5
Posted by: currentplay Date: Sunday, September 14, 2008 9:08:45 AM In reply to: janice shell who wrote msg# 259216 Post # of 259239
That is the most stupidest statement I have ever read on a board. They would want it to die to walk away from covering any short position thus they make a 100% profit.. Nice HUH.. That statement you made just gave you away..
Huh? Why should shorts want to "kill" any company? If it dies, they'll never be able to make any money on it again.
Posted by: jimmym4 Date: Sunday, September 14, 2008 9:17:32 AM In reply to: janice shell who wrote msg# 259225 Post # of 259239
Yes, I am. Smart enough to have figured out that CMKX was a scam from its inception.
There is a thin line between a SCAM and a STING..It sure looks like a scam, and was always supposed to IMHO
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 14, 2008 8:45:18 GMT -5
Posted by: jb1967lbk Date: Saturday, September 13, 2008 10:40:56 PM In reply to: jimmym4 who wrote msg# 259205 Post # of 259239 Nobody stole anything from Urban, Jimmy. If anything, it would appear that it was Urban who had done a lot of stealing himself. Even Mark Faulk seems to have accepted this fact by now and we all know he's an idiot bent on milking the old CMKM Diamonds shareholder base for whatever chump change he can shake out of them. As for naked short selling, it's not an act of theft, Jimmy. It's an act of portfolio management. If I'm right, I win; if I'm wrong I lose. Life goes on. Either way, I'm just on the sidelines. I'm not the one who kills these companies. Posted by: janice shell Date: Saturday, September 13, 2008 11:23:33 PM In reply to: jimmym4 who wrote msg# 259214 Post # of 259239 Huh? Why should shorts want to "kill" any company? If it dies, they'll never be able to make any money on it again. Posted by: oreodiamonds Date: Sunday, September 14, 2008 2:07:54 AM In reply to: janice shell who wrote msg# 259212 Post # of 259239 Actually that happened already when the Feds called 17 banks on June 8th on the red carpet and brought them literally to their knees! Get ready for a huge problem in the stock market which will cause a domino effect.Posted by: jimmym4 Date: Saturday, September 13, 2008 11:18:20 PM In reply to: jb1967lbk who wrote msg# 259211 Post # of 259239 Ok fair enough..I Pick Patrick will win in the end!..The shorts have already failed in trying to kill his company
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 14, 2008 8:48:23 GMT -5
showers without ChrisL Cannoneer Re: Let's face it... « Reply #1 Yesterday at 7:22am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- When I heard that Mark was appointed to the new CEO position, I knew that we were toast and that this whole deal is down the toilet. What Tyler boys are doing now is takingcare of their TOGI bud, running up corporate expenses with the addition of their pal onto the payroll. NIce job. Any collections will be consumed by Frizzell and company "What goes on in Tyler, STAYS in Tyler" sounds like VEGAS SCAM SCAM SCAM SCAM SCAM mrmag321 Mercenary Re: Let's face it... « Reply #2 Yesterday at 8:42am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Why in the world would you even think about given anymore donation. Most here, yes at our choice, have invested, supported this stock and whatever management has been in place. We have donated over 64 million bucks. This stock and whatever management is not owed a dime, it owes it shareholders. I rather see it dead than even hint at asking shareholders for anything. It's amazing just how STUPID people are to keep trying to paint a picture of grandiose things. Something may come eventually but we would be lucky to get .0001 on the dollar. But as has been proven, there's still enough greedy people who would hang on waiting for the big pie in the sky. Keep dreaming cmkxdiamond.proboards66.com/index.cgi?board=general1&action=display&thread=57566
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 14, 2008 9:09:37 GMT -5
funado DIAMOND JEDI Re: buzz talk 9/12 and beyond « Reply #46 Yesterday at 9:45pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I just wanted to point out something that I think is VERY IMPORTANT about the lawsuit by CMKM and others against Viashow concerning some Cuban music performances. Hawkeye1 spotted this and Soonerlew brought it to the Buzz Talk. You can find it there under this heading: ty soonerlew hawkeye1 Senior Diamond Miner **Page two under Common Allegations** « Thread Started Today at 6:20am » Please read page two under (Common Allegations) www.cmkmdiamondsinc.com/documents/cmkm_vs_viashow.pdf------------------------------------------------ Reading this, the thing that caught my eye is a sentence that says the following: The sum of $1,500,000 was invested with Viashow through the UAJC 2005 Irrevocable Trust, the MDW Trust, Hugo Cancio, and Fuego Entertainment. ------------------------------------------------ Then, in another section of the lawsuit, it says the folllowing: ------------------------------------------------ For purposes of this litigation, the Plaintiff CMKM also has acquired certain rights as a party to this Royalty Contract by virtue of a written joint venture agreement dated June 14, 2008. ------------------------------------------------ Drillbit (edited: I thought this was Oil.pro, as I originally wrote, but I notice that it was actually Drillbit -- my apologies) mentions that this clearly shows that CMKM (the New Team) is aware of trusts, even though they say there are none. But, in my opinion, the following is the really interesting part: The "Royalty Contract" that it talks about is the contract between the UAJC 2005 Irrevocable Trust, the MDW Trust, Hugo Cancio, and Fuego Entertainment on the one hand and Viashow on the other. It lays out the terms for lending the $1,500,000. And this very "Old Team" group (essentially the UAJC 2005 Irrevocable Trust and the MDW Trust) gave some rights concerning the contract to CMKM, the "New Team" (essentially the Tyler group as represented by Attorney David Koch). Since the lawsuit is from the New Team, it's saying that the New Team has acquired rights that clearly belong to the Old Team. And they acquired them as recently as June 14, 2008. I think this is the first time I've ever seen any clear indication that the New Team and Old Team are working together in any way. I assume the trustees of the UAJC 2005 Irrevocable Trust and the MDW Trust are Urban Casavant and Michael Williams, but that's only a guess. For them to give some rights to the New Team for a contract that they entered into with this Viashow outfit sounds pretty cozy to me. It looks to me like the curtain got raised just a bit in this case to show that the Old Team and the New Team are possibly the same team. Does anyone else see this? And can we expect to see some more, possibly surprising cooperation between the two teams in the future? Hmmmmm... Something to think about, isn't it? AIMHO, Funado « Last Edit: Yesterday at 10:31pm by funado » millionaires.proboards86.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=21980&page=3
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 14, 2008 9:11:50 GMT -5
seagull Administrator Gossip Queen of CMKX Re: gossip 9/14/08 « Reply #1 Today at 2:20am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- seagull Yesterday at 6:59pm, gangusgreen wrote: I haven't heard anything lately other than what is on the boards... but I do believe we will be rich soon... and I hope it is the 'very very soon' that we were informed of a few days ago. It does seem that Dicek was right when he said Tyler is keeping the company alive in order for us to be paid... so shorty cannot refuse to pay us..... .... plus they are a distraction to make it appear that we are a broke little company on the verge of bankruptcy However as Abadgoodgirl has pointed out, certs were paid for, so the money is there to pay certed shareholders. And that trust money must go to shareholders........ as has been stated by others. It is acrewing interest. The concern I have is that every time we pass a 'quarter marker'........ the money cannot be taken out until the next quarter since it is locked in....... or so it seems... Remember all the little comments like "If we are not paid by ______(say the end of April) we are screwed" ? Well it seems those comments are coming in quarters... April, July, Oct. .... so the other must be Jan. Others have pointed out that Tyler's primary purpose it to make shorty pay for the electronic shares ... thus the unshareholders company......... and the possible reason Frizzell called it Kevin's company. One thing for sure... The CEOs that have been picked are inexperienced... so it seems that they really don't have a role at all... maybe just to hold a space as puppets so the attorneys can operate... someone else is calling the shots. Also, there must be at least 2 trusts... one for the money shorty paid for certs and the other from the drilling and possibly diamonds. .......probably why we were told not to consider taking less than $1 per share. Just my opinion .... « Last Edit: Today at 2:25am by seagull » tramp2.proboards88.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=6121
|
|