|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 14, 2008 9:19:34 GMT -5
hawkeye1 Senior Diamond Miner Re: gossip 9/14/08 « Reply #11 Today at 4:19am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- www.cmkmdiamondsinc.com/documents/cmkm_vs_viashow.pdf COMMON ALLEGATIONS ----------------------------- 8. Since 2002 CMKM has sold over $200 million in corporate stock to the public. Plaintiff CMKM alleges much of the stock was issued illegally and is in the process of seeking recovery of the proceeds obtained from the sale of this stock. CMKM is informed and believes that money from the sale of CMKM stock was deposited into certain trust and invested in the subject Royalty Contract set out below and made the basis of this litigation. For purposes of this litigation, the Plaintiff CMKM also has acquired certain rights as a party to this Royalty Contract by virtue of a written joint venture agreement dated June 14th, 2008. « Last Edit: Today at 4:22am by hawkeye1 » tramp2.proboards88.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=6121
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 14, 2008 9:22:18 GMT -5
hawkeye1 Senior Diamond Miner Re: gossip 9/14/08 « Reply #13 Today at 5:54am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CLB01332&read=645CMKM also invested $1,000,000 of company funds in Mobile Wireless Security in July 2004. There has been no accounting of this advance or loan or purchase made by CMKM. (Exhibit 0.) New management has also discovered a wire transfer indicating a purchase of eight diesel trucks from GMC in Canada. The wire totaled $371,100.86 made payable to Owens and Sweitzer. (Exhibit I.) As of the date of this lawsuit, CMKM has been unsuccessful in locating the vehicles that were purportedly purchased. It is also clear that Casavant and his associates directed the expenditure of millions of dollars of company money on joint venture agreements with companies like USCA, GEMM, SGGM and Golden Arch Resources. The company intends to pursue any recoveries it may have for any failed investments it has with these and other companies. 28 (See Exhibit P.) 13 PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION MOTION « Last Edit: Today at 5:56am by hawkeye1 » tramp2.proboards88.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=6121
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 14, 2008 9:25:32 GMT -5
only2percent Diamond Finder and Miner Re: gossip 9/13/08 « Reply #12 Yesterday at 9:06pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yesterday at 10:19am, seagull wrote: We need someone to work against SEC. It is SEC that should be investigated! ( "Pentagon released five video frames ..." ) Are we going to be that easy? « Last Edit: Yesterday at 9:28pm by only2percent » tramp2.proboards88.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=6117
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 14, 2008 9:36:14 GMT -5
Anyone thought of this before? What will we do if that is the next thing brought out? Should we comply and send our certs to Tyler? Naaaaaw, let's not!!!! timewilltell Ace of Diamonds Re: gossip 9/14/08 « Reply #10 Today at 7:12am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- i agree scruffy,.. i never believed in tyler as a voice to listen too. all of there preaching can be said to be propaganda . iether to sway cmkm. cert holders to switch there share's to tyler .so as to show that they are the dominant co in this story , , god bless all bonafides ,..and mgnt, .. twt. cmkxgroup.proboards88.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=20482cynthiae45 and scruffy's post that TWT answered....Sept 9, 2008, 10:49pm, cynthiae45 wrote:IMHO, I think these documents speaks volumes. It shows "Again" how tyler lies. They are crooks that are grasping for straws and trying to make themselves rich and screw over the bonifides. I believe they are the ones that are keeping our money from being distributed. Think about it, the funds can not be released until Tyler is gone or taken over. IMO I think Kevin and Frizzell started out good guys and saw the value for themselves and decided to try and take it over. If you go back to the beginning and lay out the steps taken, one by one, your answers are all there. I have 100% faith in the old team. From this point on, I will not allow anyone to downgrade my faith that we will be vindicated in the end. When is the end? I do not know, but I do believe in RG, UC, RM, RM and yes DS. Think about it, go back to the beginning and look for yourself, it is all there. Everyone keeps second guessing anything and everything that comes out on the boards, linking this and that to CMKX. We are trying to put a puzzle together without knowing what the puzzle picture looks like and we will never see it until this is over. Go back to the beginning and it becomes a clearer picture, not the full picture but a partial picture. I believe Urban is looking out for us. If you don't, then offer up your shares for sale to the people that do believe and get out and go on with your lives. Just stop trying to bring everyone that does believe down to depression and hoplessness. Vent if you need to vent, then move on. If you want to stay in, then try to keep positive and have faith. Faith is believing in something you can't see and don't fully understand. I am going to keep the faith in CMKX, because I do believe I am in to win, if not for myself then my children and/or my grandchildren will. It will happen of this I am sure of. We are the CMKX family and we need to stick together and stay positive no matter how hard that is sometimes. Don't let Kevin or Frizzell or bashers bring you down, that is what they want! I was also disheartened when I read DS email, then Kevin, then the lawsuit. However, I have decided I will not allow anyone to take away my hopes and dreams and belief in this. Because I do still believe. PERIOD! Believe in vindication or not, it is up to each and everyone of the shareholders to decide for themselves. ~cynthiae ************************************** Cynthiae, do you think that if Tyler weren't playing ball that they would be allowed to get away with it? Can we really believe that Tyler alone are in control here? The unbelieveable secrecy that has been maintained surrounding every aspect of CMKX should tell us something, should it not? Who might exercise that amount of control? Just food for thought, IMO... ~scruffy
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 14, 2008 9:38:02 GMT -5
ChuckWheat Board Addict Re: Mark Faulk NEW CEO OF CMKM « Reply #30 Yesterday at 10:35pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- What a progression...from IBM to our Faulking CEO... Does anyone else see a minor conflict of interest situation evolving here...? Someone writes a book with substantially more detailed information than the 40,000 of us shareholders have dug up in the same period...then is suddenly crowned CEO? How did he get access to all his information? How can we have any confidence that the information he presented wasn't influenced (at best) by certain promises from the company, perhaps in exchange for a book that would seemingly paint the Tyler crew in a much more flattering light than other former key CMKX leaders? I'd love to be told the real Faulking truth with this company, just once... C-Dub cmkxgroup.proboards88.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=20477&page=2
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 14, 2008 9:39:16 GMT -5
By: sharasilva 14 Sep 2008, 09:49 AM EDT Msg. 764923 of 764970 (This msg. is a reply to 764919 by stkupnc.) Jump to msg. # stk, proof is in the pudding, CMKX found no diamonds, other companies have the high risk claims, Entourage wants out and FALC ground has not helped their share price, records show massive fraud by UC to dispose of shareholder money, nobody that knows anything about diamond or mining is in CMKX management
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 14, 2008 9:40:09 GMT -5
By: sully47 14 Sep 2008, 08:27 AM EDT Msg. 764920 of 764970 Jump to msg. # trixijude....that's because... the ns has been taken care of and the old CMKX has the money. The NEW CMKM is mopping up and will trade again! JMHO! By: sharasilva 14 Sep 2008, 09:51 AM EDT Msg. 764924 of 764970 (This msg. is a reply to 764920 by sully47.) Jump to msg. # sully you are full of BS. There is zero evidence of that. By: imsowearyi 14 Sep 2008, 10:11 AM EDT Msg. 764939 of 764971 (This msg. is a reply to 764920 by sully47.) Jump to msg. # sully/aladin99 - I like that but did you forget the %10 LifeTime Royalties? By: aladin99 14 Sep 2008, 10:08 AM EDT Msg. 764937 of 764971 (This msg. is a reply to 764920 by sully47.) Jump to msg. # Sully - Thats is CIMple....& I think it will be true...When this is ready Tyler will have another totally new BOD again to transfer everything back to the original owners...
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 14, 2008 9:41:04 GMT -5
By: imsowearyi 14 Sep 2008, 09:58 AM EDT Msg. 764927 of 764971 Jump to msg. # So Mark Faulk doesnt own any shares - very interesting :-)))
By: aladin99 14 Sep 2008, 10:02 AM EDT Msg. 764930 of 764971 (This msg. is a reply to 764927 by imsowearyi.) Jump to msg. # Mark??? Unless he bought them from Deli like goodolboy & Al Hogdes...
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 14, 2008 9:42:13 GMT -5
By: imsowearyi 14 Sep 2008, 10:04 AM EDT Msg. 764931 of 764971 Jump to msg. # aladin, my thoughta r this - latest SEC announcement (622B unregistered shares/40K shareholders) and CMKMs latest PR is the "Y" (fork n the road) that things are ready to move forward!!!!! )
By: aladin99 14 Sep 2008, 10:14 AM EDT Msg. 764943 of 764971 (This msg. is a reply to 764931 by imsowearyi.) Jump to msg. # ImSo...M!When SEC stated that meant they are done helping us about NSS/FTD/US issue...!!!!!!!!!Their Mission Accomplished!!!!
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 14, 2008 9:46:02 GMT -5
By: aladin99 14 Sep 2008, 10:29 AM EDT Msg. 764962 of 764971 Jump to msg. # Another one's Theory Tyler will make shorty pay $$$ for electronic shares since our certs were paid...Tyler hired all 3 shareholders to give us more confidence and no need experts to be on board for this purpose...
|
|
|
Post by hundredtoone on Sept 14, 2008 9:50:43 GMT -5
Maybe Faulk and others on the BOD are UN-SHAREHOLDERS that did not call for CERTS or never recieved them...NOW they must keep CMKM alive in order to FORCE shorty into COVERING the FTDs...OR they ARE SHORTY and own bunches of SHORT SHARES and LONG UNCERTED SHARES...or BOTH...they are Hedge Hogs after all...NOW they could be attempting to control the company do a R/S and rip off any money they can get from INSIDERS...they are HOGS after all IMO...anyway I figure my CERTS are the only REAL SHARES and so I will NEVER part with them unless I get a TENDER OFFER high enough to make it worth FIVE YEARS OF HELL...and that is roughly FITTY FOUR...Flying Moose(cmkxunofficial)
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 14, 2008 10:00:23 GMT -5
silverbulletgirl DIAMOND JEDI WARLORD Re: BBAN JARVIS ENTERTAINMENT & CMKI « Reply #4 Today at 9:12am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- OK so now they say an agreement has been reached with the MDW Michael D. Williams TRUST and GRW Gary Walters Trust soooooooo ? www.cmkmdiamondsinc.com/index.html Documents: NC Suit Eton vs. CMKM Eton NC Lawsuit Answer CMKM vs. ViaShow Lawsuit (important note) SEC Motion to Default Urban Casavant Note re. CMKM vs. ViaShow lawsuit: CMKMs attorneys have brought this action on its own behalf and on behalf of Stephen Pecevich and the MDW and GRW 2000 Irrevocable Trust in this litigation. As a result of negotiations with various parties to the Viashow contract, an agreement has been reached which gives CMKM certain rights in the written contract. Representation of the MDW and GRW 2000 Irrevocable Trust is limited to this cause of action.WTF does that mean? Is that the trust that holds our money? Tyler cannot get into it cause it is an Irrevocable TRUST and PROTECTED? Is Michael Williams our Trustee? friend of Maheu family? Too bad we have to wait this out I can but alot cannot I have PATIENCE of a SAINT. but don't know make me slow down on CMKX either I am gung ho to the end or the beginning of the CONGLOMERATE. millionaires.proboards86.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=22016
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 14, 2008 10:40:43 GMT -5
hawkeye1 Senior Diamond Miner Re: gossip 9/14/08 « Reply #17 Today at 7:37am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- By: aladin99 14 Sep 2008, 12:31 AM EDT Msg. 764904 of 764970 (This msg. is a reply to 764695 by CHICPICK.) Jump to msg. # CHICKY...someone is having a bigger hope than anyone's hope here.... Read post#744918... What R your comments on that??? lol -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Here is post 744918By: dmgroup 23 Jul 2008, 05:30 PM EDT Msg. 744918 of 764970 (This msg. is a reply to 744909 by nufced.) Jump to msg. # nuffy when shore hits 1.54 we get paid or a 1 for 1 share trade then it becomes cmkx and drops to .0001 tramp2.proboards88.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=6121
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 14, 2008 10:41:49 GMT -5
hawkeye1 Senior Diamond Miner Re: gossip 9/14/08 « Reply #14 Today at 7:20am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- By: stervc 14 Sep 2008, 03:19 AM EDT Msg. 346710 of 346712 (This msg. is a reply to 346707 by Sugarpaw.) Jump to msg. # Sugarpaw, with that CMKM Diamonds Appointment... I think Mark will do a very fine job in turning things around for us CMKX shareholders. I'm glad he is now "officially" part of the TEAM! v/r Sterling tramp2.proboards88.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=6121
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 14, 2008 10:46:00 GMT -5
Posted by: pontalba Date: Saturday, August 16, 2008 7:10:40 PM In reply to: None Post # of 259257
What's to trade, tiger. It's an insolvent shell with no assets and no prospects of assets. What would justify the market cap even if it traded at .0001?
Of does CMKX have magic pixie dust that creates value somehow?
Posted by: jimmym4 Date: Saturday, August 16, 2008 10:24:29 PM In reply to: pontalba who wrote msg# 256446 Post # of 259257
Of does CMKX have magic pixie dust that creates value somehow?
Pixy Dust...That is what the borkers are going to need once frizzy releases the Crackin
Posted by: janice shell Date: Saturday, August 16, 2008 11:00:27 PM In reply to: jimmym4 who wrote msg# 256471 Post # of 259257
And I don't understand your obsession with the brokers. They did nothing wrong.
Urbie is a crook who issued 800 billion shares. What part of that don't you get?
Posted by: jimmym4 Date: Sunday, August 17, 2008 9:55:11 AM In reply to: janice shell who wrote msg# 256477 Post # of 259257
I get it Janice..The borkers are guilty also..And I have yet to see urbie indicted..My guess is he is helping the DOJ/FBI/SEC Fry MUCH bigger fish...Just like IBM locked them in with no escape with the cert pull...remember this statement>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Revocation of 34 Act Reporting. On or about Oct. 28, 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission, in response to CMKM's withdrawal of its appeal, declared Administrative Law Judge Brenda Murray's initial decision final. This effectively revoked CMKM's reporting status under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. As such, it is currently unlawful for any broker dealer to effectuate a trade in CMKM's common stock.
Now the Bulk Cert that some borker tried to buy..HMMMM..Now WHY would they do that when it is ILLEGAL..ROTF
And all you naysayers say Maheu never did anything..Sheesh
Posted by: pontalba Date: Sunday, August 17, 2008 10:43:39 AM In reply to: jimmym4 who wrote msg# 256486 Post # of 259257
Well, jimmy, since the "bulk cert" was mentioned only as a rumor, I don't think it's high on the list of things to look at.
This was an unsolicited quote stock, jimmy. Brokers took orders and routed them to MM's for trade matches. The hard data showed negligible FTD's. So why again are brokers in trouble, and who would they be?
Do post a fact for a refreshing change of pace. "Frizzy said" is not a fact.
Posted by: currentplay Date: Sunday, August 17, 2008 12:41:47 PM In reply to: pontalba who wrote msg# 256489 Post # of 259257
Bulk cert was no rumor..
In the first of two CEO updates on 4/18/07, Mr. West mentioned an ongoing investigation by attorney Bill Frizzell “into the sale of bulk certs.” To this subject, Mr. West now adds, “We have evidence of the attempt by at least one specific large brokerage firm to purchase for itself, rather than simply transfer, such certificates.
The Company has recently halted the transfer of a large bulk certificate to a major brokerage firm from a third party. A specialist will be hired to completely research and investigate both sides of this transaction along with the many recent transactions of possible insider sales of large bulk certificates
Posted by: jimmym4 Date: Sunday, September 14, 2008 10:28:16 AM In reply to: currentplay who wrote msg# 256504 Post # of 259257
Ahh Yes Current..Me Thinks Frizzy is getting Ready to ROE his boat into the Storm..Much DOE to follow..LOL
|
|