|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Nov 12, 2009 15:53:34 GMT -5
leadorfollow DIAMOND JEDI MASTER Re: 4 MONTHS SINCE CORE SAMPLE PR « Reply #11 Yesterday at 12:57pm »
ok so if tyler isn't going to say anything about the samples what about koch...? anyone have contact info on koch...?
|
|
|
Post by eastcoastswing on Nov 12, 2009 16:13:22 GMT -5
"Big week" said the RealJBond on Monday??? You were doing so well with your predictions until the last few times.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Nov 12, 2009 22:03:55 GMT -5
errrr.... What am I missing here?? Pedro claims "Bill's official FTD number -- 134 billion shares.. official as of June 2005., yet the document he refers to (posted by Jimmy) seems to say differently?? Then we have this excerpt from an email,(months later Sept 2005?? or was this a repost on that day??) from Frizzels other half (John Martin) reinforcing the same info as in the filing??
Excerpt...John Martin One last thought. I get numerous e-mails every day asking me if I thought there is anything left here for us shareholders. If we thought there was nothing to gain, we would have already stepped away and let you all know the facts. We believe the “goods” are there. We know we have a huge naked short (835 billion shares, including cert holders, and NOBO lists, and with just 20% of street shares faxed in, leaving 80% not even reporting! This does not begin to mention those who are not included from other countries.) These two things alone can be our winning combination. ... Gezus, you think Frizzell would have stepped up to the plate and settled this, once and for all, a long time ago.. Thoughts anyone who may have a clue??Posted by: Pedro2004 Date: Thursday, November 12, 2009 6:03:24 PM In reply to: jimmym4 who wrote msg# 283574 Post # of 283599 Re: PEDRO Call frizzell and have him give you a written statement saying his figures were wrong and there is NO FTD in our stock.Then i will come with hat in hand and ask for forgivness...24 hours should be enough? There's no hope for you. The information was supplied months ago, and you didn't even look at it! investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=40110875 investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=41823898 Ps.... This is the third time I'm supplying this information. That's Bill's official FTD number -- 134 billion shares. Well, official as of June 2005. Since June 2005 -- many of the FTD's closed. And you can thank Delidogg for that! Posted by: jimmym4 Date: Thursday, November 12, 2009 7:47:02 PM In reply to: Pedro2004 who wrote msg# 278738 Post # of 283600 As always pedro you only crop out half the FACTS!.that was only 10,500 accounts!!..Trillion plus for sure.. SH Exhibit 1 is an accumulation of over 10,500 accounts documented in the monthly statements of CMKM shareholders. SH Exhibit 1 is an accumulation of 10,500 accounts which total 455 billion shares. CMKM has provided us with a NOBO/OBO list which is recognized in the industry as an accurate list of street name share owners. We have also obtained a list of current certificates (hereafter certs) of ownerships which have been issued by the transfer agent. The current cert list from the transfer agent confirms that stock certificates issued by the company total 320,350,228, 958. The number of shares reported by the NOBO/OBO list tell us that 67,009,739,337 shares are being held in brokerage accounts of Objecting Beneficial Owners. There are 6,993 registered OBO accounts in this stock. This total of 837,359,968,295 exceeds the reported issued and outstanding 703 billion shares of the company by approximately 134,000,000,000. This alone is a staggering number of shares which have been sold by various third parties but do not exist except as electronic entries. 14 As we worked to compile these numbers we saw an increasing number of summaries that were not being reported on the NOBO/OBO list. We soon learned that our NOBO list does not include stocks which have been sold through most overseas brokers. We have also learned that most Canadian brokerage houses have shares that are not represented in the OBO list. This stock has traded in 64 countries around the world. When you add the shares which are being represented by electronic entries in foreign countries our total of outstanding shares will approach one trillion shares. The NOBO list tells us there are 52,676 accounts in various brokerage institutions that report to the NOBO service. Our figures are a tally of only 10,500 of those accounts at the brokerage houses. The true tally of shares in the market place will not be known until we add the remaining 42,000 accounts owned by CMKM shareholders that have not yet responded to our request. We ask this Court to consider that revocation of this stock may have more to do with the naked shorted shares than a concern over late filings. This may explain what I perceive to be a rush to judgment. I have never seen a case with so much at stake where there has never been one word of negotiating a settlement. At least on the surface, the only problem here is the filing of some financial reports and obtaining the time necessary to prepare such reports. Why did the SEC choose the shortest possible time period to obtain a ruling from this court? Rule 360 of the SEC Rules of Practice provides for a decision in 12(j) cases to be rendered in either a 120, 210 or 300 day time frame “at the discretion of the Commission”. Why not extend this matter into the 210 or 300 day provisions instead of the lightning fast 120 day program we are under at this time so that filing might protect this large group 15 of shareholders? Why was this proceeding filed prematurely (at least by our interpretation)? Can the Court assist us in this regard? Why does the SEC resist the company’s request to view the “open fails to deliver” which are given to them daily from the SEC?
|
|
|
Post by JoeRockss on Nov 12, 2009 22:17:18 GMT -5
JoeRockss...you just insulted every a**hole in the world. LOL...Now that was clever.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Nov 13, 2009 8:02:47 GMT -5
.. Well I sure as hell don't understand the OBO/NOBO stuff,
but then what did Frizzell mean by this?? " The true tally of shares in the market place will not be known until we add the remaining 42,000 accounts"
and John Martin by this?? " We know we have a huge naked short and with just 20% of street shares faxed in, leaving 80% not even reporting! This does not begin to mention those who are not included from other countries.)"
Frizzell again in request for FOIA.... and this?? This request is being made on behalf of 5,050 shareholders of CMKX stock. These shareholders own over 300 billion shares of common stock. This number does not include shareholders who possess certificates of ownership. A current NOBO/OBO list has confirmed that there exists a minimum of 59,669 accounts in various firms with holdings of CMKX. A December 2004 certificate detail report from the transfer agent states that 2033 people hold certificates of ownership. Those certificates represent 326 billion shares being held by individuals other than Cede and Co. By these numbers 626 billion shares are owned by only 7,083 shareholders. The company states that 703 billion shares are issued and outstanding. The CMKX shareholders that own the balance of the 59,669 accounts (an estimated 50,000) are confirmed owners of the remaining of the outstanding stock. I trust you can understand our need for the information requested in this document. I will be glad to provide you with documentation of my group’s share ownership upon your request.
How can these statements just be ignored? As per the norm in this stock......Seems everyone has their own opinions and of course it is always interpreted to fit their own beliefs.... Frizzell, care to put this matter to rest?? Silly me, I didn't think so. Posted by: Pedro2004 Date: Friday, November 13, 2009 7:16:01 AM In reply to: jimmym4 who wrote msg# 283595 Post # of 283640 Let's not sway your ignorance onto another subject, shall we? You, Jimmy, you have made the claim that prior to and during the May-2005 SEC OIP hearing -- Frizzell stated the NSS was in the trillions. You, Jimmy, have said that Frizzell has never recanted the trillion dollar number, therefore the number is correct. I provided a June-2005 document that shows Bill did in fact recant the number – and it’s at 134 billion. Therefore, you no longer have a right to argue that Bill said there’s a trillion NSS number. Bill’s last publicly disclosed number is -- 134 billion shares. You do have a right to guess, speculate, dance naked, masturbate – claiming there’s a higher number based on “X” amount of accounts. But that’s just your opinion, and not a Frizzell statement. I provided the document that showed you -- Frizzell recanted the number down to 134 billion shares. End of discussion. Chunky provided you with an FTD link. End of discussion. What you don’t have a right to do, Jimmy -- is use my name (Pedro) as a tool of your manipulative games when you write: Pedros recent post proves that report not correct..Behold>>>>> My argument with you -- was proving Frizzell recanted his number down to 134 billion shares. Chunky’s argument with you – is a website that shows the CMKM recorded FTD’s. Two completely separate arguments. So why don’t you give yourself a little respect. If you think the document is proof to counter Chunky’s argument – go for it! But don’t start representing my name within your conclusions – okay?
|
|
|
Post by snifferpup on Nov 13, 2009 22:07:34 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Nov 13, 2009 23:17:38 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Nov 13, 2009 23:26:52 GMT -5
stockrich DIAMOND JEDI Re: Back to the Interpleader ! « Reply #4 Today at 2:28pm »
The INTERPLEADER was the trigger for Urban to step down and the relocation to Texas.
Notice the 'urgency' in Kevin's email that he'll take a copy of interpleader in any stage.
I believe the shares were 'split' right there. Bonafides stayed in Vegas, non bonafides went off to Texas.
Moran created an "accurate and appropriate response"...he's identified the rightful owners (he has a bonafide shareholders list)
Urban steps down (as he said he would) and they split-off the rest of the non-certed, unregistered shareholders off to Texas, and begin the long lengthy litagation we have come to hate.
It's not about the "bonafides". I believe we're being held hostage until that large illegitamite, illegal, monster of a mess is cleaned up.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Nov 13, 2009 23:37:59 GMT -5
By: GREGM1 13 Nov 2009, 12:07 AM EST Rating: Msg. 884472 of 884717
Jump to msg. # I was going thru some old papers and came across some of our maps from the race I went to in Dallas. We had some prime land back in those days. Something has got to be coming our way sooner or later.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Nov 13, 2009 23:42:27 GMT -5
By: newtopennies 13 Nov 2009, 12:13 PM EST Rating: Msg. 884578 of 884717
Jump to msg. # WAS THE DOJ questionaire really for shareholders, or was it intended for someone else to force them to finally act? eom.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Nov 13, 2009 23:57:10 GMT -5
By: aladin99 13 Nov 2009, 10:21 PM EST Rating: Msg. 884702 of 884718 Jump to msg. # Questionnaire will be reposted by the end of next week,,,why it took that long to modify those 6 questions? WhyTH they need help from W.D.C headquarters...Does that make you wonder and go Hmmmmmmmmmm? ??
|
|
|
Post by str8biodiesel on Nov 14, 2009 0:01:28 GMT -5
Stay STRONG and long!! Stength in numbers LONGS! GO CMKX!
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Nov 14, 2009 11:23:58 GMT -5
ty bikinipro Thanks PJ: a small segment from that MP3 mccurdydon: I keep hearing from Frizzell and the Tyler group that we are going back to trading. The only way we are going back to trading is there has got to be a huge buyout and some kind of share restructuring. I don't know how they are going to do it.. or move us into a new entity. I do find it interesting it is taking 90 days to find a transfer agent and quiet period for an IPO is 90 days as well. Isn't that interesting? BikiniproI googled quiet period: Quiet Period What Does It Mean? What Does Quiet Period Mean? In terms of an IPO, the period where an issuer is subject to a SEC ban on promotional publicity. The quiet period usually lasts either 40 or 90 days from the IPO. Investopedia Says Investopedia explains Quiet Period In other words, If you take your company public, you can't talk about your stock to anybody for 3 months. 3 months?....how about 84 months.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Nov 14, 2009 11:25:02 GMT -5
ty bikinipro forevercmkx Diamond Finder and Miner
Very interesting theory on the 90 days IPO quiet period.
We just might become a part of the greatest stock market squeeze play of all time.
I'm still believing if we trade and provided that it is simultaneously coupled with a PR announcing our valuation, we will surpass Berkshire Hathaway's market value...imvho.
Tramp, we will easily reach $40 per share in a very short period of time.
Going back to trading is a very positive move not only for us, but the entire stock market.
I hope that all of the financial market reforms are solidly in place before we start trading again.
|
|
|
Post by varnson on Nov 14, 2009 12:20:55 GMT -5
Wow 40.00 PPS is a nice thought but the reality is that that would be 40k X the what we bought for and that is not going to happen. Many think that a comglomerate is about to happen and all because someone "Acca" said it was possible but that is hardly reason to think it will.
The valuation is even more murky considering there are supposed to be two core samples for 1.9M acres? Even if there were 500 that is still very low to make a determination of a major find and don't forget the DOJ has stated the PRs UC put out were bogus and has stated so in the indictments.
To think we would be more valuable then Berkshire is absolutely hilarious just as the 40.00 PPS which is 20.00 higher then Microsoft? CMKX never completed what they said and never turned a dime as a legit company nor filed SEC regs to be legit so to think that CMKX could be one of the most valuable companies ever in the history of the market is well...if that were true cert holders would be getting overtures from buyers for their certs for at least 1.00+ PPS.
Also keep in mind that we do not know if we even have claims as most lapsed because of the yearly 12.00 per hectre fee and then keep in mind that land is owned by the Canadian Gov and they have final call on anything that happens with the claims. That brings us to who owns the claims rights now, you think they will just hand them over? that is another court battle in its self.
I bring up these issues because they are real and I do want people to get something but 40.00 for a revoked stock that even Gus says was a pump and dump? If we were to get .005-.01 we would be doing well and don't forget they don't pay out on the number years we have been in this or mental anguish.
The last point is the 90 day TA situation IMO that is only because no TA wants to have to maintain a data base of a dead stock...there is no profit in it as they have to maintain as if it is a trading stock IMO after the 90 days they will say no TA wants the hassle and that this has nothing to do with trading again. Time will tell where we go if we go at all but to tell people that 40.00 PSS is possible is just plain reckless and totally without merit.
I hope for the best but when I see rumors that are now passed off as fact it is just plain unfair to those that want to believe in this as a vehicle to make millions on a 500 dollar investment it just does not happen. Lower your expectaions and if it sounds way too good to be true then it is simply that...untrue.
|
|