|
Post by maraman101 on Aug 18, 2010 15:58:16 GMT -5
Ed Jagacki, No mara is short for my whole last name, but I am a distant relative to Ted leonsis. It's a greek thing, but anyway in a situation there are certain people in charge of things. Whoever is in charge of releasing the funds might need a little enticement to do so. Why can't we set a side a little grease fund for those who have that power to get us our money.
|
|
|
Post by joe on Aug 18, 2010 17:57:04 GMT -5
Don't sell yourself short. Attorney Hodges stated the facts. $3.87 Trillion. This is for the Shareholders. Divide this by the actual outstanding shares, not the authorized outstanding shares because some of the shares were retired, then you will get the approximate amount per share. If you want to accept less, please keep it to yourself..don't advertise... you will not speed up the process...don't give them any more excuses to delay trying to figure out what Shareholders are willing to accept. The money is yours period! Contribute to those in need not in greed. Pay it forward, NOT Back! Thank you, BHollenegg well said thank you very much.
|
|
|
Post by BHollenegg on Aug 18, 2010 20:35:32 GMT -5
Don't sell yourself short. Attorney Hodges stated the facts. $3.87 Trillion. This is for the Shareholders. Divide this by the actual outstanding shares, not the authorized outstanding shares because some of the shares were retired, then you will get the approximate amount per share. If you want to accept less, please keep it to yourself..don't advertise... you will not speed up the process...don't give them any more excuses to delay trying to figure out what Shareholders are willing to accept. The money is yours period! Contribute to those in need not in greed. Pay it forward, NOT Back! Thank you, BHollenegg I wholeheartedly agree bob! And like I told you before I will live up to my promises of radically changing "pay it forward" with 139 people on my trust beneficiary list.no joke, no bullshi*, no balls, no blue chips. With all due respect, sincerity and love bob, delusional grandeur Delusional Grandeur...I know you will. You suffered a lot and still thought of the welfare of others. This is not just about a transfer of wealth in money due to the value of each share of CMKX, it is a transfer of wealth in good deeds for those in need due to the high values CMKX Shareholders continue to share. Thank you DG .... All the best, BHollenegg
|
|
|
Post by lurknomore on Aug 18, 2010 21:15:02 GMT -5
BOB- WHY WON'T YOU ANSWER MY QUESTION???Lurknomore...please do not take a part of my message and change the original intent of my message. I posted "If you want to accept less, please keep it to yourself..don't advertise... you will not speed up the process...don't give them any more excuses to delay trying to figure out what Shareholders are willing to accept" I could do the same to your message and changed the meaning.. "Figure this out:... Interest". Lurknomore please changenomore my messages Thank you, BHollenegg BOB- I merely featured the EXACT PHRASE that I was addressing, so as to be specific. Actually, your ENTIRE POST implied the possibility that "they" could really be "trying to figure out what Shareholders are willing to accept," and THAT is very unsettling.There was no ill intent there.Now, instead of critiquing my posting style, could you address the real question I had, please? Is there a possibility that "they" could really be "trying to figure out what Shareholders are willing to accept?" How could someone on the boards saying they would accept .01 pps change the actual payout? I would think the amount is non-negotiable.
|
|
|
Post by BHollenegg on Aug 18, 2010 21:41:15 GMT -5
BOB- WHY WON'T YOU ANSWER MY QUESTION???BOB- I merely featured the EXACT PHRASE that I was addressing, so as to be specific. Actually, your ENTIRE POST implied the possibility that "they" could really be "trying to figure out what Shareholders are willing to accept," and THAT is very unsettling.There was no ill intent there.Now, instead of critiquing my posting style, could you address the real question I had, please? Is there a possibility that "they" could really be "trying to figure out what Shareholders are willing to accept?" How could someone on the boards saying they would accept .01 pps change the actual payout? I would think the amount is non-negotiable. Lurk..the boards are monitored. ..enough said. Thank you, BHollenegg
|
|
|
Post by lurknomore on Aug 18, 2010 21:54:11 GMT -5
That is a TROUBLING response, Bob. I thought the $$$ was non-negotiable.
But please, in the future, when I ask you to explain a post you have made, would you please not address me like I am some low-life RB basher?
I have always been a cmkx LONG and a Bob H. fan. YOU, especially, should know that, considering my past pms to you...
|
|
|
Post by beavis on Aug 18, 2010 21:54:55 GMT -5
I'll settle for .000622 x 10 to the power of 4... (I think I did that right, lol)
... actually, I just want to know when... I'll settle for now, tia.
|
|
|
Post by BHollenegg on Aug 18, 2010 22:31:11 GMT -5
That is a TROUBLING response, Bob. I thought the $$$ was non-negotiable. But please, in the future, when I ask you to explain a post you have made, would you please not address me like I am some low-life RB basher? I have always been a cmkx LONG and a Bob H. fan. YOU, especially, should know that, considering my past pms to you... Lurk..please accept my apology. My post was for clarification. In no way do I consider you a basher. When a part of a statement is taken out of context and questioned, it makes it look like it happened. If I answered a partial statement, it will hit all the message boards as actually already did happen. Please understand why the concern .. Thank you Lurk, BHollenegg
|
|
|
Post by 2018 on Aug 18, 2010 22:51:06 GMT -5
2) we have confirmed through inside sources at the Federal Reserve that our $3.8+T is held in a custodial account and is earmarked for us; thanks atl, that is one thing. if that is good info, then next thing is how many shares is it divided into , if we get it.
|
|
|
Post by Duc N Altum on Aug 18, 2010 23:28:31 GMT -5
2) we have confirmed through inside sources at the Federal Reserve that our $3.8+T is held in a custodial account and is earmarked for us; thanks atl, that is one thing. if that is good info, then next thing is how many shares is it divided into , if we get it. wyatt11_11: As per the shareholder list created with the new transfer agent on April 7, 2010 there are: 800,000,000,000 common shares authorized; 703,514,957,466 common shares issued and outstanding; zero preferred shares authorized or issued and 48,679 shareholders of record. PER TYLER ----------------------------------------------------------- bhollenegg Diamond Hunter Posts: 33 Re: LETS MAKE A DEAL -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Don't sell yourself short. Attorney Hodges stated the facts. $3.87 Trillion. This is for the Shareholders. Divide this by the actual outstanding shares, not the authorized outstanding shares because some of the shares were retired, then you will get the approximate amount per share. If you want to accept less, please keep it to yourself..don't advertise... you will not speed up the process...don't give them any more excuses to delay trying to figure out what Shareholders are willing to accept. The money is yours period! Contribute to those in need not in greed. Pay it forward, NOT Back! Thank you, BHollenegg
|
|
|
Post by 2018 on Aug 19, 2010 7:49:42 GMT -5
thanks atl, that is one thing. if that is good info, then next thing is how many shares is it divided into , if we get it. wyatt11_11: As per the shareholder list created with the new transfer agent on April 7, 2010 there are: 800,000,000,000 common shares authorized; 703,514,957,466 common shares issued and outstanding; zero preferred shares authorized or issued and 48,679 shareholders of record. PER TYLER ----------------------------------------------------------- bhollenegg Diamond Hunter Posts: 33 Re: LETS MAKE A DEAL -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Don't sell yourself short. Attorney Hodges stated the facts. $3.87 Trillion. This is for the Shareholders. Divide this by the actual outstanding shares, not the authorized outstanding shares because some of the shares were retired, then you will get the approximate amount per share. If you want to accept less, please keep it to yourself..don't advertise... you will not speed up the process...don't give them any more excuses to delay trying to figure out what Shareholders are willing to accept. The money is yours period! Contribute to those in need not in greed. Pay it forward, NOT Back! Thank you, BHollenegg yea duc, but those numbers that tyler put out, are just the "official" numbers from years ago. Basicaly to me, its just "official public answer" that is put out. And the list itself , or shareholders list has not been put out for years, nor it will be put out. Acca told me long ago, they will never put that list out. And he is right. no details on canceled, no details on nss shares etc. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ they are sticking to "official" company numbers. Company issued, company outstanding. its repeating of the old story and info. And that is all. imo.
|
|
|
Post by bkscott on Aug 19, 2010 8:04:37 GMT -5
The way I look at it as it pertains to the 3.87 T being real. Well, the Govt for years told us that there was not such thing as "Naked Shorting". That we were just disgruntled shareholders that lost thier money in the risky penny stock business. This was thier 1st line of defense to get us to drop all belief that we were intitled to damages. We did'nt go away did we? Then the crash of the banks happened and all was exposed. Now they are not going to say anything about the Trust Fund. They will never say yes or no. Another line of defense. The only way they will acknowledge the fund is there is when the make AL prove it. If they acknowledge it before hand then they will have to pay it now. They need to continue to use our money. So AL will have to refile to drag this out. But we will get paid.
IMO BKscott
|
|
|
Post by Ed Jagacki on Aug 19, 2010 8:14:08 GMT -5
Ed Jagacki, No mara is short for my whole last name, but I am a distant relative to Ted leonsis. It's a greek thing, but anyway in a situation there are certain people in charge of things. Whoever is in charge of releasing the funds might need a little enticement to do so. Why can't we set a side a little grease fund for those who have that power to get us our money. Too bad... I was getting ready to PM you for "comps" to my favorite football team's Sunday nighter...
|
|