|
Post by goodolboy on Sept 8, 2010 8:42:17 GMT -5
Your nonsense about religion on this board is not appreciated and the moderators should remove it (that goes with politics too). Keep the analogies , comments focused on the thread. Rumors. While Mona has another physic vision of the future, I appreciate that more than religion talk. Point taken. Although, I would assume suggesting religion as being "nonsense" is less appealing to most here than my analogy.
|
|
|
Post by gjfromfla on Sept 8, 2010 8:48:31 GMT -5
True, nonsense to us using religion on the boards because of so many different beliefs. Keep it away
|
|
triple
Diamond Hunter
Posts: 30
|
Post by triple on Sept 8, 2010 9:02:18 GMT -5
the first part is from the information room (jacberts room): pongo_7: It's going to be a GREAT DAY! scrappy24: Pongo is it going to be a great morning, a great afternoon, or a great evening, or all of the above? pongo_7: Watch closely....our waiting will end very, very soon ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ the second part is from the unplugged room(Mona's room): Mona Lisa Smiles: buachail getting paid and the rumor of payment before Sept 16th ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- here is the right copy and paste: Buachaill: wh are we talking about? Mona Lisa Smiles: buachail getting paid and the rumor of payment before Sept 16th just to clear that up,before people here jump too quick on conclusions !
|
|
|
Post by goodolboy on Sept 8, 2010 9:08:13 GMT -5
True, nonsense to us using religion on the boards because of so many different beliefs. Keep it away Point made. Will do.
|
|
|
Post by klonopin2mg on Sept 8, 2010 9:15:37 GMT -5
said it two weeks ago, rumors based on facts as i know them:
repost...
key was Canada in 2004...urban cassavant sold claims and locked us into a payment(PERIOD)
NSS "locked in" and no key will unlock it.(PERIOD)
key has been in "Trust".
Canada, September 2010 then throw away the key as "IT" will never work again.
Just "One in and of a Million"
Klon'
|
|
|
Post by enoughalready on Sept 8, 2010 9:20:34 GMT -5
OK Pongo - you have NEVER been right =========
pongo_7: It's going to be a GREAT DAY! scrappy24: Pongo is it going to be a great morning, a great afternoon, or a great evening, or all of the above? pongo_7: Watch closely....our waiting will end very, very soon
Mona Lisa Smiles: buachail getting paid and the rumor of payment before Sept 16th
|
|
|
Post by diamondogg11 on Sept 8, 2010 9:23:11 GMT -5
OK Pongo - you have NEVER been right ========= pongo_7: It's going to be a GREAT DAY! scrappy24: Pongo is it going to be a great morning, a great afternoon, or a great evening, or all of the above? pongo_7: Watch closely....our waiting will end very, very soon Mona Lisa Smiles: buachail getting paid and the rumor of payment before Sept 16th one time... just ONE time PLEASE!!! ;D
|
|
|
Post by goldengriff on Sept 8, 2010 9:43:04 GMT -5
THERE WILL BE NOTHING TEmPORARY ABOUT IT! EO WILL END RUN THE GOPvoices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2010/09/mitch_daniels_has_a_plan.htmlI'm impressed by Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels's op-ed laying out his proposal for "a time-limited, emergency growth program." It's a real plan, with concrete policy ideas that might actually make a difference. It's mercifully free from vague hand-waving about business uncertainty and government spending. Instead, it begins with a payroll-tax holiday. Daniels would like to see the tax suspended for a full year. He then offers four policies that would "offset the revenue loss twice over," though I'm quite sure the CBO wouldn't agree with that assessment: recalling unspent TARP and stimulus funds; giving the president the power to "impound" congressional spending projects in order to spend less; a federal hiring freeze; and "some sort of regulatory forbearance period in which the job-killing practice of agonizingly slow environmental permitting is suspended." Daniels thinks it "fanciful" to imagine that the Obama administration would adopt some variant of this plan, but these are hardly alien ideas to them: The White House has been weighing a payroll-tax holiday for weeks; Peter Orszag, in his role as OMB director, proposed a more Congress-friendly variant of Daniels's impounding powers; a hiring freeze is a bit of a blunt tool, but it's not that far off from the discretionary spending freeze that the administration is already supporting. The outlier here is the regulatory forbearance period: I could see the argument for something like this in the financial sector, where regulators got very aggressive at the same time banks got very cautious. But the White House won't buy it in the environmental space. The convergence is clearest in Daniels's sixth and final suggestion: "Accelerated or full expensing of business investment." As it happens, the administration is announcing a policy to do exactly that later this week. It appears that one of the editors informed Daniels of this, as the paragraph now ends with this parenthetical: "Reports indicate that the administration is about to propose this very idea. If so, good." From my reporting, the problem wouldn't be in the White House. It would be in Congress. I've asked a number of Republican offices whether they'd be willing to work with the Democrats on a payroll-tax holiday. Without fail, they've told me no, that they no longer support a payroll-tax holiday given the size of the deficit. By Ezra Klein | September 8, 2010; 9:17 AM ET
|
|
|
Post by jawz2010 on Sept 8, 2010 9:43:56 GMT -5
OK Pongo - you have NEVER been right ========= pongo_7: It's going to be a GREAT DAY! scrappy24: Pongo is it going to be a great morning, a great afternoon, or a great evening, or all of the above? pongo_7: Watch closely....our waiting will end very, very soon Mona Lisa Smiles: buachail getting paid and the rumor of payment before Sept 16th one time... just ONE time PLEASE!!! ;D You're kidding right? Pongo? He's nobody. And Mona? She's even less tuned in. It's nothing more than the same old Monday's coming pumps. It's been two weeks and it's time to get it going again because there's too many of us who are stating our disgusts. They have to try and get everyone excited again. But it's nothing more than
|
|
|
Post by TallyHo on Sept 8, 2010 9:55:45 GMT -5
one time... just ONE time PLEASE!!! ;D You're kidding right? Pongo? He's nobody. And Mona? She's even less tuned in. It's nothing more than the same old Monday's coming pumps. It's been two weeks and it's time to get it going again because there's too many of us who are stating our disgusts. They have to try and get everyone excited again. But it's nothing more than Wait......so you are saying not to believe Pongo and Mona? ? I can't imagine why you don't trust them.
|
|
|
Post by 3bid on Sept 8, 2010 10:15:56 GMT -5
Important reminder:
Always use IMO wherever appropriate and whenever necessary.
|
|
|
Post by joe on Sept 8, 2010 10:22:16 GMT -5
THERE WILL BE NOTHING TEmPORARY ABOUT IT! EO WILL END RUN THE GOPvoices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2010/09/mitch_daniels_has_a_plan.htmlI'm impressed by Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels's op-ed laying out his proposal for "a time-limited, emergency growth program." It's a real plan, with concrete policy ideas that might actually make a difference. It's mercifully free from vague hand-waving about business uncertainty and government spending. Instead, it begins with a payroll-tax holiday. Daniels would like to see the tax suspended for a full year. He then offers four policies that would "offset the revenue loss twice over," though I'm quite sure the CBO wouldn't agree with that assessment: recalling unspent TARP and stimulus funds; giving the president the power to "impound" congressional spending projects in order to spend less; a federal hiring freeze; and "some sort of regulatory forbearance period in which the job-killing practice of agonizingly slow environmental permitting is suspended." Daniels thinks it "fanciful" to imagine that the Obama administration would adopt some variant of this plan, but these are hardly alien ideas to them: The White House has been weighing a payroll-tax holiday for weeks; Peter Orszag, in his role as OMB director, proposed a more Congress-friendly variant of Daniels's impounding powers; a hiring freeze is a bit of a blunt tool, but it's not that far off from the discretionary spending freeze that the administration is already supporting. The outlier here is the regulatory forbearance period: I could see the argument for something like this in the financial sector, where regulators got very aggressive at the same time banks got very cautious. But the White House won't buy it in the environmental space. The convergence is clearest in Daniels's sixth and final suggestion: "Accelerated or full expensing of business investment." As it happens, the administration is announcing a policy to do exactly that later this week. It appears that one of the editors informed Daniels of this, as the paragraph now ends with this parenthetical: "Reports indicate that the administration is about to propose this very idea. If so, good." From my reporting, the problem wouldn't be in the White House. It would be in Congress. I've asked a number of Republican offices whether they'd be willing to work with the Democrats on a payroll-tax holiday. Without fail, they've told me no, that they no longer support a payroll-tax holiday given the size of the deficit. By Ezra Klein | September 8, 2010; 9:17 AM ET thanks golden
|
|
|
Post by Brigantine on Sept 8, 2010 11:05:22 GMT -5
A most excellent post. Thanks for the follow up and explanation of my rather succinct post. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is the revenue service of the United States federal government. The agency is a bureau of the Department of the Treasury, and is under the immediate direction of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue. The IRS is responsible for collecting taxes and the interpretation and enforcement of the IRC (Internal Revenue Code). Yes that maybe what it was originally titled as but did the Treasury at some point take a back seat to the control of the Fed many decades ago? As Brig said," The IRS is nothing more than a collection arm of the Federal Reserve Bandits." Years past I did research upon research on this topic and I kept running down the avenue of the same result, all federal taxes, go to pay the interest of the national debt and nothing else. Hmmm? If my family was a part of this Fed group would I ever want that national debt to ever go away when it compounds and compounds to where every single working person is lining my wealth? And Aaron Russo had a friend who was one of the members of the Fed families and that person asked Aaron, "who do you think pushed for woman's equal rights in the work place, meaning pay wise?" And Aaron was then answered, "WE WERE because the way it used to be was the man went to work and the mom stayed home and took care of the family, where only one person per household was getting taxed. With then having 2 people per household, raises everything." So just with that 1 paragraph alone I see Brig's comment spot on. So the thought would then be, well I do not believe for one second that not 1 cent of the Federal Taxes we pay goes anywhere else besides the national debt and also with what our government keeps borrowing from the FED, well here is an example of where the real taxes take care of everything and the Federal taxes do not. The whole list I do not have time to go way back and look it all up again BUT when you pay for gas there is a gas tax and in that tax, the money there goes to roads, bridges and other things alike. When one buys cigarettes then then has a tax and that goes to its different collection groups and the list goes on and on. And in most states there is a state tax that mainly takes care of the essentials of that state or region, but once again it is a flat out crime about those FEDERAL taxes and where that money really goes. And that is unless things have changed from 4 years ago when research this but I do not see why they would change their ways unless they got a smack down by a financial clean up. If just an ounce of truth of the Fed were leaked out, it would most likely cause a revolution do to how they have been wrapped around and in our financial system raping all. And how no one from our govt would step up to the plate to rid our system of this goes to show who the real power was and is. Looking forwarded to the WAS, with hope. And Benjamin Franklin said central banks are worse than standing armies. And also during Lincoln's presidency he needed money for the war and had those groups coming to him saying that they would offer him money for the war BUT they would charge for it 34% interest. Abraham Lincoln then realized that congress could help this situation and they Abraham Lincoln came out with the "green backs" (dollars) to finance the war. Abraham said the green backs are THE PEOPLES MONEY and that was what the Treasury WAS for but when you have the whole scam of the Fed families and how they snuck in, things can be made to look like what ever way they look like if those in control want something to look like something. Anyway, enough said on this topic, all imo.
|
|
|
Post by diamondogg11 on Sept 8, 2010 12:18:07 GMT -5
one time... just ONE time PLEASE!!! ;D You're kidding right? Pongo? He's nobody. And Mona? She's even less tuned in. It's nothing more than the same old Monday's coming pumps. It's been two weeks and it's time to get it going again because there's too many of us who are stating our disgusts. They have to try and get everyone excited again. But it's nothing more than you missed the subtle sarcasm?..lol and the laughing emoticon?..lol but yeah.. secretly.. I hope that one of these guys gets lucky just ONE time.. that's all we need..lol
|
|