|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Aug 31, 2010 19:00:09 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Aug 31, 2010 19:01:21 GMT -5
thanks soonerlew... PJ King of Diamonds Re: ALL PALTALK UPDATES HERE.. « Reply #343 Today at 1:34pm » (6:52 AM) Wheres-da-BEEF: mnwriter: Aug 22, 2010, 9:09pm, funado wrote: Thanks! Last question (from me anyway). Will you be coming into Paltalk before it happens? Funado - procmkm wrote: No, During! tramp2.proboards.com/index.cgi?bo....ad=1267&page=18
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Aug 31, 2010 19:02:16 GMT -5
PJ King of Diamonds Re: ALL PALTALK UPDATES HERE.. « Reply #345 Today at 6:32pm » (5:28 PM) tokenjo: vickes_11: I spoke with Attorney Hodges. Attorney Hodges will directly notify the Shareholders upon notification. If the information is not directly from Attorney Hodges, please treat with caution. Thank you,I spoke with Attorney Hodges. Attorney Hodges will directly notify the Shareholders upon notification. (5:28 PM) tokenjo: bHollenegg (5:28 PM) vickes_11: he posted that on millionaires board about 10 min ago tramp2.proboards.com/index.cgi?bo....ad=1267&page=18
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Aug 31, 2010 19:03:16 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Aug 31, 2010 19:04:27 GMT -5
bikinipro Gossip Column Queen cobra42 Diamond FinderNot that I'm an ACCA fan, remember what he said when asked about a week or so ago by a shareholder if he would talk again before we got paid and he replied no, but he would speak "during" the time we get paid. Now this in addition to the upcoming FFGO announcement and the Indian Trust being paid out, just maybe some major dots are connected. t rampYES...YES..YES... millionaires.proboards.com/index.....ay&thread=33780
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Aug 31, 2010 19:05:28 GMT -5
ty bikinipro ty soonerlew ShowMeTheMoney Mod Squad Re: The "Other Side" is getting desperate, good si « Reply #13 Today at 7:09pm » Almost exactly one year to the date prior to Al Hodges announcing his intentions to file the Bivens-based Class action law suit, I had the opportunity to speak with Al privately on the phone. During our call, he noted that he did know Bob Maheu personally, and that he in fact used to work for him back in the 1970s. Al also told me that Bob was the finest gentleman, husband, and patriot he had ever known. Al noted that he was at the SEC hearing, when the company was delisted, and that he saw and spoke with Maheu there. But, what really struck me, and has stayed with me all this time, is the following comment Al made to me in closing: "I can tell you this... Bob would have known that, at his age, he might not be able to see this through to the end. And, I can also tell you that there is no way on God's Green Earth that Maheu leaves this life without having someone in place to carry on." Al made it clear that Bob Maheu sweated the details... that it simply wasn't in Bob's nature to leave anything to chance... ever! This is not an opinon... it's what Al told me... as close as I can remember the words... almost precisely one year before Al filed the Bivens! - Show millionaires.proboards.com/index.....ay&thread=33780
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Aug 31, 2010 19:06:17 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Aug 31, 2010 19:12:50 GMT -5
sptrader DIAMOND JEDI WARLORD Re: The Buzz Chat 8/30 « Reply #33 Yesterday at 1:49pm » "Every other court case will now have our Biven's as a precedent setting case."....... Good point Icecrush. **I believe that will ONLY be true, IF our case is ultimately successful. glta jmho NightHawk DIAMOND DIGGER Re: The Buzz Chat 8/30 « Reply #37 Yesterday at 4:40pm » Yesterday at 2:14pm, 144r wrote:[quote[Our case is already being cited, it was at the virginia law studies (or something to that effect) regarding NSS. [/quote] 144r do you have a link. TIA tex311 DIAMOND DIGGER Re: The Buzz Chat 8/30 « Reply #38 Yesterday at 4:53pm » www.virginialawbusrev.org/VLBR3-1pdfs/Boyer.pdfNightHawk try this. Go to the end and work back.. Popeye Snort DIAMOND DIGGER Re: The Buzz Chat 8/30 « Reply #39 Yesterday at 4:58pm » Yesterday at 4:53pm, tex311 wrote: Here is the text to go with it.By: bhollenegg 30 Aug 2010, 09:28 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 956975 of 956986 (Reply to 956965 by jfarn) JFarn... CMKM Diamonds is covered in a legal study in something that became a major challenge to the USA PATRIOT Act...AML…Anti-Money Laundering. A reference to the use of a Sting operation is mentioned in footnote 50. www.virginialawbusrev.org/VLBR3-1pdfs/Boyer.pdf All the best, BHollenegg millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=33779&page=2
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Aug 31, 2010 19:15:15 GMT -5
ty 3bid..... By: bhollenegg 31 Aug 2010, 10:33 AM EDT Msg. 957167 of 957191 (Reply to 957150 by normiecraig) There are legal documents stating there are Trust Funds for the CMKX Shareholders; an Attorney with over 40 years experience in law, head of an established law firm, expert witness, Judge, Arbitrator in more than 100 cases, represented cases in the Supreme Court, listed in Who’s Who, worked with Mr. Robert Maheu and friend for over 30 years, has gone on court record stating he has the evidence there are Trust Funds and has dedicated his resources, his staff, his time and personal time to pursue the release of the funds for the CMKX Shareholders while fighting a corrupt system to make right a just outcome for 50,000 plus Shareholders, victims of the largest Naked Shorted Stock in the history of the WORLD Market by filing the largest Bivens type law suit in the history of the US Stock Market…. ...and then there is Normiecraig, an alias on a public message, with no facts, no respect for others, no proof, pulls shenanigans to upset investors of CMKX by providing erroneous information, posting numerous destructive messages …. “ Had an associate call me last night asking my personal opinion of the probability of the chance shareholders get a gazillion dollars, my answer, A BIG FAT 0000000000. Poor fella was distraught because he said that on the "message" boards that people felt differently. I then proceeded to tell him about the analogy of if everyone jumped of the Brooklyn Bridge, would he, he then understood, just more distraught…yet my writings never, again NEVER promise anything, they just reiterate the FACT of the matter, history repeats itself. As history or track record has shown with this stock, those trying to continue the square peg, round hole syndrome obviously have no clue about the goings on of LIFE. “ …and you post to me “ Unlike you, I do see LIFE, and real life isn't about head games, excuses, disguises, and ….” Shareholders do not need any pegs to figure you are out. Whether you are a basher or a shareholder or both, you pegged yourself, no facts, no proof, no clue, boasts making investors distraught… very sad. GLTU, BHollenegg
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Aug 31, 2010 19:16:09 GMT -5
Brigantine Diamondologist Re: Updated Daily!! RUMORS ....Believe em' or NOT « Reply #204 Today at 11:13am »
As I have said before, Al Hodges would not have said in open court that they exist, if they did not. That is the point BH is making above. (in addition to ripping on the lying bastiche he was replying to.)
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Aug 31, 2010 19:18:27 GMT -5
TY Pennypauly & Sooner..... This is the first time I have seen Sparky make a prediction. Lets hope he is right!!!!! Ty: sparkysantos 31 Aug 2010, 11:10 AM EDT Rating: post rating 0 Rate this post: Msg. 957178 of 957179 Jump to msg. #SEC Deposition of Attorney Bill Frizzell:From Page 150 of transcript of 01/06/2006 deposition (link to transcript at bottom of post): Leslie Hakala: Do you believe the stock of CMKM Diamonds have been subject to significant naked short selling? Attorney Bill Frizzell: Absolutely. Leslie Hakala: Who first told you that? Attorney Bill Frizzell: Nobody first told me. I made that decision myself when I pulled 12,000 broker statements from shareholders. I know based on the NOBO list and based on at that time the cert list from the transfer agent there was already over 50 billion shorted shares just by the information we have from just the NOBO list and the cert list from the transfer agent back in June (2005). There was [sic] 50 billion shorted shares. But setting that aside if I just took the 12,000 shareholder statements that we had multiplied our findings from that by what we believe to be the total number of shareholders, you’ve got two trillion naked shorted shares. I mean I didn’t do that as just some haphazard multiplication. We analyzed these shareholder statements to see if we had a true cross section in terms of number of average shares per shareholder. Were we getting just the shareholders reporting shareholder statements if they had a whole bunch of shares or were the shareholder statements had little bitty shares [sic]? It was a true cross section of the shareholders in the work we did on that. It’s just inescapable that there is a ton more than 700 billion shares of this stock in the market place. Sparky PS - And incidentally, Gold is now trading at $ 1,246.20 an ounce, up $ 9.13 from yesterday; and is now priced at less than one percent below its all-time high of $ 1,256.65. Why is the price of Gold relevant, you ask? Elementary my Dear Watson ... Because the well-connected pigs who parted with the funds CMKX shareholders are about to receive know not only how much has been paid and will be paid out, but they also most likely know when we will have said funds in hand. And being the greed-driven thugs they are, they know the demand for Gold is about to spike, they want to ride the wave up, and to do that they must accumulate long positions and cover short positions. And since the time is now near, that is suddenly happening; which is why Gold is now hovering just below its all-time high. Above quotes from: cmkx.info/Deposition-Bill-Frizzell-2006-01-06.pdf
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Aug 31, 2010 19:24:19 GMT -5
Brigantine Diamondologist Re: Updated Daily!! RUMORS ....Believe em' or NOT « Reply #215 Today at 11:27am »
Al did not present the documents at the hearing simply because they were discussing the format and structure of the required re-filing.
And yes TallyHo, if and when the time comes for the documents to be submitted, they will become part of public record. However, that timing would be during the actual trial which happens after discovery.
We may yet end up re-filing and we may end up getting to discovery, but I very highly doubt we will go past discovery.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Aug 31, 2010 19:29:03 GMT -5
Al did not present the documents at the hearing simply because they were discussing the format and structure of the required re-filing. And yes TallyHo, if and when the time comes for the documents to be submitted, they will become part of public record. However, that timing would be during the actual trial which happens after discovery. We may yet end up re-filing and we may end up getting to discovery, but I very highly doubt we will go past discovery. goodolboy God of Diamonds Re: Updated Daily!! RUMORS ....Believe em' or NOT « Reply #217 Today at 11:34am » Yes, but Mr. Hodges will have to provide sufficient evidence to substantiate the claims in the amended suit. And, even then the chance of the case being dismissed under rule 12 is relatively high. Looking forward to sept 16.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Aug 31, 2010 19:38:15 GMT -5
Al did not present the documents at the hearing simply because they were discussing the format and structure of the required re-filing. And yes TallyHo, if and when the time comes for the documents to be submitted, they will become part of public record. However, that timing would be during the actual trial which happens after discovery. We may yet end up re-filing and we may end up getting to discovery, but I very highly doubt we will go past discovery. deltadon30228 Diamondologist Re: Updated Daily!! RUMORS ....Believe em' or NOT « Reply #226 Today at 12:23pm » Just some thoughts! Let's think outside the box for a minute, if nearly 4 trillion dollars was paid by the guilty parties to avoid prison time, wouldn't the proof or evidence used to get the agreement made be locked up tight and to never see the light of day?? With that point, wouldn't part of the agreement be to keep all evidence from the courts, you must view the Bivens separate from the agreement. The Bivens is a case against the individuals of the SEC, the evidence from that meeting was an agreement between the guilty parties (Hedge funds, MM, Brokers, and DTCC) Keep in mind the SEC assisted in the sting. I personally think Maheu made this agreement iron clad and a guaranteed payout, drop dead payouts and that guaranteed payout part of the agreement. Don't you? This Bivens is smoke and mirrors and has no significance in the "IF" category, this is a matter of "WHEN" Timed release! Don, IMHO!
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Aug 31, 2010 19:58:39 GMT -5
Brigantine Diamondologist Location: At the Shore Re: Updated Daily!! RUMORS ....Believe em' or NOT « Reply #239 Today at 2:08pm »
Lest I repeat myself: What I have done though, is gone back and listened to the Court Audio and transcribed portions directly related the collected funds. This is not the entire audio transcription. Only a part.
From the illicit court audio:
Judge: Who in your analysis is the trustee of the funds? Who holds the funds?
Hodges: There are actually several trustees who hold the funds one of whom is currently the DTCC. I only say that because I know the funds are deposited at the dtcc.
Judge: Spin that out for me. The Acronym
Hodges. The Depository Trust Clearing Corporation. They are the clearing house for all of the financial transactions that happen in the united states.
Judge Private or Public?
Hodges It is a Private company, but they act as a public one, unfortunately.
Judge: What document covers the terms under which they hold those funds?
Hodges: A Trust Agreement.
Judge: Between?
Hodges: Between the people who originally set this up.
Judge: Who are?
Hodges: One of whom was Bob Maheu.
~There is some discussion and background given.
Later... Hodges: That was in fact done. And I have a witness who was there when it was done. They had a room about three times the size of your courtroom in which they had representatives from all these brokerages from all over the world. Who were there, present. They watched a video presentation, because Mr. Maheu as the court may be aware was at one time mostly associated with the cia, all kinds of other...
Judge: I was going to ask you if it was the same Robert Maheu.
Hodges: It is indeed. A gentleman I had opportunity to make acquaintance with in the 70's, to my good fortune.
At any rate, all of these people were accumulated in this room. They were shown a video and a slide presentation of all of the evidence of their wrongdoing. And they were offered an opportunity. You can either step up and sign away your money and pay a reasonable amount for each transaction that you did illegally and improperly or you can walk out of here and get prosecuted and go to jail. Because what you did, was criminal.
And, every single person in that room stepped up and made a deal.
After that time, there became a big conflict between the SEC commissioners and the other governmental entities who were supporting the sec commissioners about who is going to have the right to release this money to the shareholders and when? And my understanding is it went on for some number of months, but ultimately the sec commissioners prevailed and convinced Mr. Maheu and his associates it had to be their decision because only they and the rest of the government could determine when this sting had fulfilled its function.
And that is the basis upon which he gave them, the power about when the money is to be released. And it is my understanding that every trust that is currently being held for of this money is being held by a person who is sworn to observe that requirement, that the SEC or the government or whoever is going to make this payment, goes first.
And as my information is, that it is the SEC commissioners who had this power. That's why they are defendants in this case.
Judge: Let's return to your Bivens theory, it's a taking.
Hodges: It is.
Judge: Why?
Hodges: This money was supposed to be released within a year of the time that the company was originally de-listed. It was originally de-listed in October of 2005. This is now almost October of 2010, some four years past that time. It is a taking only because they refuse only not withstanding information which they have continued to give to various shareholders. They have continued to refuse to release this money. If they don't release the money, then it is a taking. Because they are preventing what is rightfully ours, for us to receive. That's why it is a taking.
Judge: Thank you.
There is 6:01 more that follows, back and forth with the DOJ atty and the wrap. But that is the critical part of the story.
I'm just going to make a wild guess here, but I'm thinking the funds have been confirmed.
Attorney Al Hodges, officer of the court has said in open court that the funds exist and have been confirmed. To someone who understands what that means, it gives comfort. To the rest of you, you are either too ignorant, illiterate, stubborn or stupid to grasp and acknowledge verifiable truth when you see it
|
|