|
Post by johnjrambothe2nd on Aug 24, 2011 16:27:14 GMT -5
Why is Mr. Hodges not responding to/ignoring Mr. Fryar? Everyday that goes by without him responding to Mr. Fryar makes me think that Mr. Hodges has ulterior motives. At this point in time, I do not give a flying **** if you ban me, scold me or whatever!!!!
Mr. Fryar is a PAID friend of the shareholders, if Mr. Hodges is ignoring Mr. Fryar, then Mr. Hodges' has some explaining to do. PS Imminent has expired over a year ago..... Has anyone heard what the one and only email that Al sent to Fryar was all about? [size=4 ] Mr. Hodges NEVER responded to Mr Fryar, to the best of my knowledge. [/size]
|
|
|
Post by straighttalk on Aug 24, 2011 17:40:43 GMT -5
So your saying we are done...? I do not know any more so we will have to wait and see what Mr. Hodges does today. Bull ( cough ! ) chit
|
|
|
Post by Ed Jagacki on Aug 24, 2011 18:01:16 GMT -5
Has anyone heard what the one and only email that Al sent to Fryar was all about? [size=4 ] Mr. Hodges NEVER responded to Mr Fryar, to the best of my knowledge. [/size] [/quote] Well then, maybe you should check before making such an angry spectacle of yourself...
|
|
|
Post by Brigantine on Aug 24, 2011 18:04:57 GMT -5
Why is anyone surprised by this? AH for reasons of strategy, security or otherwise did not reveal his hand during the process of the Bivens suit. Why would anyone think he would spill his guts to or even acknowledge the attorney of an angry, belligerent shareholder and the people like him, who think they have a right to know that they want to know?
The naivete' is Mind boggling to say the least. (and that is being as kind as I possibly can be.)
|
|
|
Post by Ed Jagacki on Aug 24, 2011 18:07:53 GMT -5
Brig:
Completely understood... and thank you for the restraint...
|
|
|
Post by Brigantine on Aug 24, 2011 18:11:24 GMT -5
It was difficult for me, as you well know... LOL
|
|
|
Post by marbearcat on Aug 24, 2011 18:11:58 GMT -5
I do not know any more so we will have to wait and see what Mr. Hodges does today. Bull ( cough ! ) chit ST, lets be serious here. Nothing you've said has come to fruition nor even appear to be happening. What goes? What is the REAL story?
|
|
|
Post by briwadd on Aug 24, 2011 18:13:41 GMT -5
Why is anyone surprised by this? AH for reasons of strategy, security or otherwise did not reveal his hand during the process of the Bivens suit. Why would anyone think he would spill his guts to or even acknowledge the attorney of an angry, belligerent shareholder and the people like him, who think they have a right to know that they want to know? The naivete' is Mind boggling to say the least. (and that is being as kind as I possibly can be.) The naivete' is ming boggling? I guess that statement could apply to alot of different scenarios. Your comments are exactly what fuels the fire. From my perspective, the Fryar effort is pro Hodges, not anti Hodges. Do you think we all got together and donated money to Fryar just to prove Al Hodges wrong. If we thought Al was making all of this up, we would just move on, not spend money to prove a point. Although I don't know Al personally, I do believe he is on the up and up. However, I don't necessarily trust the people he is dealing with...i.e. the government. And this latest move just reinforces my concerns. Once again, the Fryar efforts is just another means to find the truth. Briwadd
|
|
|
Post by Ed Jagacki on Aug 24, 2011 18:17:04 GMT -5
Briwadd:
The fact is that not everyone involved with the Fryar effort shares your perspective.
Ed
|
|
falcman1
Dr. Of Diamonds
SOON!
Posts: 131
|
Post by falcman1 on Aug 24, 2011 18:23:47 GMT -5
Briwadd: The fact is that not everyone involved with the Fryar effort shares your perspective. Ed and yours as well
|
|
|
Post by marbearcat on Aug 24, 2011 18:24:58 GMT -5
Briwadd: The fact is that not everyone involved with the Fryar effort shares your perspective. Ed
|
|
|
Post by Brigantine on Aug 24, 2011 18:34:02 GMT -5
Briwadd, I had resolved not to reply to you any more, because you are very accomplished at twisting people's words to your own agenda, whatever that may be.
That being said, your comment about not trusting the people AH is dealing with, pretty much makes my point. AH has his reasons for holding his information close. He has already stated in so many words, that he is lied to repeatedly and information needs to be held close.
How does prying information from AH by means of the Fryar Action in any way do anything but reveal potentially damaging information to the enemy. It may be salve to the open wounds of the long suffering shareholders to find out some small bit of confirmation information. But that small bit of information in the hands of the enemy and believe me when I say the enemy is involved in the Fryar action as certainly as the fact that the sun came up this morning, may be an advantage that will help win a small or large battle that ultimately denies us our ROI.
I know how difficult it is. Particularly for a person of intelligence, action and consequence to sit here seemingly helplessly and watch the byzantine nature of this bizarre battle we are in. I have been here 11 years and people who know me, know how little patience I have for any of this.
But, I will say again. The Fryar action will extract nothing from this than whatever bits are strategically advantageous to AH and whatever team he is part of. And what they do extract, may in fact turn out to be misinformation.
I stand by my prediction of January 2006. We will get paid when the fed goes down.
Laugh, jeer or ridicule all you want. We shall see what we shall see when we see it.
|
|
|
Post by groundfog on Aug 24, 2011 19:02:32 GMT -5
The fed was created by congress and has to be repealed by congress. If I believed for a second the fed had to go down to get paid, I'd have been out of here long ago..because it is not happening.
|
|
|
Post by marbearcat on Aug 24, 2011 19:06:52 GMT -5
The fed was created by congress and has to be repealed by congress. If I believed for a second the fed had to go down to get paid, I'd have been out of here long ago..because it is not happening. Of course not.
|
|
|
Post by Brigantine on Aug 24, 2011 19:17:18 GMT -5
The fed was not created by Congress. The fed is a private corporation, created by individual investors. The US congress unconstitutionally gave the FED powers that the US Constitution granted to the US Congress.
This illegal and unconstitutional act effectively gave a small private cabal the ability to control our economy and ultimately our government.
What monumental wrong did you think was being righted, here?
|
|