|
Post by bjenkins on Aug 14, 2013 15:16:12 GMT -5
How come Mr. Hollenegg does not ask Mr. Hodges for copies because Mr. Hollenegg is entitled to get copies because Mr. Hollenegg was a plaintiff and the plaintiff has a right to get copies from there attorney.
Because a plaintiff has a right to get all files from his attorney and that is the law.
|
|
|
Post by marbearcat on Aug 14, 2013 15:36:24 GMT -5
How come Mr. Hollenegg does not ask Mr. Hodges for copies because Mr. Hollenegg is entitled to get copies because Mr. Hollenegg was a plaintiff and the plaintiff has a right to get copies from there attorney. Because a plaintiff has a right to get all files from his attorney and that is the law. It's all just another swift kick in the shareholders collective Nads. You can count all the truth sayers on one hand and have four fingers and a thumb left over. =^ .". ^=
|
|
|
Post by John Winston Lennon O'Boogie on Aug 15, 2013 7:16:45 GMT -5
How come Mr. Hollenegg does not ask Mr. Hodges for copies because Mr. Hollenegg is entitled to get copies because Mr. Hollenegg was a plaintiff and the plaintiff has a right to get copies from there attorney. Because a plaintiff has a right to get all files from his attorney and that is the law. It's all just another swift kick in the shareholders collective Nads. You can count all the truth sayers on one hand and have four fingers and a thumb left over. =^ .". ^= I like that...
|
|
mr777
Dr. Of Diamonds
Lies over & over again
Posts: 113
|
Post by mr777 on Aug 16, 2013 2:28:18 GMT -5
I my self had never believed that there is a trust simply because the value is unbelievable and definitely cannot be real, it it TRILLIONS and not Billions or hundred of Millions...I also wouldn't believe it even if I see a copy of it. The Euro currency has dramatically collapsed since a year or so because of some of European nations'debts amounted to hundred of billions and not trillions. Coming...it is time to go on and swipe that from our memory's list; it is clear to all that the journey came to an end and it was all "lies" and those who was behind it should be accountable for the torture caused to the shareholders. The only thing left for us is to hope that the company; one day will go back to trading, wishing to get back some of our investment. It is only my opinion.
|
|
|
Post by marbearcat on Aug 16, 2013 4:59:46 GMT -5
I my self had never believed that there is a trust simply because the value is unbelievable and definitely cannot be real, it it TRILLIONS and not Billions or hundred of Millions...I also wouldn't believe it even if I see a copy of it. The Euro currency has dramatically collapsed since a year or so because of some of European nations'debts amounted to hundred of billions and not trillions. Coming...it is time to go on and swipe that from our memory's list; it is clear to all that the journey came to an end and it was all "lies" and those who was behind it should be accountable for the torture caused to the shareholders. The only thing left for us is to hope that the company; one day will go back to trading, wishing to get back some of our investment. It is only my opinion. "And those who was behind it should be accountable for the torture caused to the shareholders" =^.".^=
|
|
|
Post by raidermike99 on Aug 16, 2013 6:05:08 GMT -5
I my self had never believed that there is a trust simply because the value is unbelievable and definitely cannot be real, it it TRILLIONS and not Billions or hundred of Millions...I also wouldn't believe it even if I see a copy of it. The Euro currency has dramatically collapsed since a year or so because of some of European nations'debts amounted to hundred of billions and not trillions. Coming...it is time to go on and swipe that from our memory's list; it is clear to all that the journey came to an end and it was all "lies" and those who was behind it should be accountable for the torture caused to the shareholders. The only thing left for us is to hope that the company; one day will go back to trading, wishing to get back some of our investment. It is only my opinion. Do you believe the US is 17 trillion in debt?
|
|
|
Post by timonesock on Aug 16, 2013 7:16:13 GMT -5
I'm taking it that AH is not honoring your request Bob? ?
|
|
|
Post by e362 on Aug 16, 2013 7:35:37 GMT -5
How come Mr. Hollenegg does not ask Mr. Hodges for copies because Mr. Hollenegg is entitled to get copies because Mr. Hollenegg was a plaintiff and the plaintiff has a right to get copies from there attorney. Because a plaintiff has a right to get all files from his attorney and that is the law. I too found that inconsistant and odd behavior of an atty with such a spoke about reputation as BH was the one to initiate this suit contacting AH, yet AH wont supply any evidence to his plaintiff.
|
|
|
Post by John Winston Lennon O'Boogie on Aug 16, 2013 7:49:26 GMT -5
How come Mr. Hollenegg does not ask Mr. Hodges for copies because Mr. Hollenegg is entitled to get copies because Mr. Hollenegg was a plaintiff and the plaintiff has a right to get copies from there attorney. Because a plaintiff has a right to get all files from his attorney and that is the law. I too found that inconsistant and odd behavior of an atty with such a spoke about reputation as BH was the one to initiate this suit contacting AH, yet AH wont supply any evidence to his plaintiff. If BH was the one who started the suit then he is the one who holds the files. He had to convince Al with something to take the case. Something really smells here..
|
|
|
Post by e362 on Aug 16, 2013 8:02:49 GMT -5
I too found that inconsistant and odd behavior of an atty with such a spoke about reputation as BH was the one to initiate this suit contacting AH, yet AH wont supply any evidence to his plaintiff. If BH was the one who started the suit then he is the one who holds the files. He had to convince Al with something to take the case. Something really smells here.. Unless I am misread BH first post on this thread, he clearly states that it was he that contacted AH.
|
|
|
Post by John Winston Lennon O'Boogie on Aug 16, 2013 8:24:46 GMT -5
If BH was the one who started the suit then he is the one who holds the files. He had to convince Al with something to take the case. Something really smells here.. Unless I am misread BH first post on this thread, he clearly states that it was he that contacted AH. And your point is..?
|
|
|
Post by e362 on Aug 16, 2013 8:46:58 GMT -5
Unless I am misread BH first post on this thread, he clearly states that it was he that contacted AH. And your point is..? My point is, Bob clearly initiated the start of this suit per his statement, he has the rights to the evidence gathered and used in the suit and it makes no sense on why AH will not share it with him or the other plaintiffs. I was under the impression from prior posts AH initiated the suit and recruited the others. Not being a legal person, not sure if that would have mmade a difference in the sharing of evidence.
|
|
|
Post by John Winston Lennon O'Boogie on Aug 16, 2013 9:05:59 GMT -5
My point is, Bob clearly initiated the start of this suit per his statement, he has the rights to the evidence gathered and used in the suit and it makes no sense on why AH will not share it with him or the other plaintiffs. I was under the impression from prior posts AH initiated the suit and recruited the others. Not being a legal person, not sure if that would have mmade a difference in the sharing of evidence. You go to a Lawyer and ask him or her to take the case ( BH in this case ). Your the one who holds the Evidences. So my point is that Bob already has or had the Evidences. In Bob's case I'm sure he held Copies for everyone involved. If he didn't do that then, oh well.. I for one would have my other Lawyer get the File from AH.. Then I would submit it to Mr. SK.. Sound Good..?
|
|
|
Post by e362 on Aug 16, 2013 9:36:10 GMT -5
My point is, Bob clearly initiated the start of this suit per his statement, he has the rights to the evidence gathered and used in the suit and it makes no sense on why AH will not share it with him or the other plaintiffs. I was under the impression from prior posts AH initiated the suit and recruited the others. Not being a legal person, not sure if that would have mmade a difference in the sharing of evidence. You go to a Lawyer and ask him or her to take the case ( BH in this case ). Your the one who holds the Evidences. So my point is that Bob already has or had the Evidences. In Bob's case I'm sure he held Copies for everyone involved. If he didn't do that then, oh well.. I for one would have my other Lawyer get the File from AH.. Then I would submit it to Mr. SK.. Sound Good..? Absolutely! Bob, your thoughts?
|
|
|
Post by jonathonanders on Aug 16, 2013 10:00:22 GMT -5
I believe Bob did ask Hodges to look into this, but remember when emails were leaked of Hodges asking for evidence from different shareholders. Don't think Bob had anything more than what we all knew..and wanted Hodges to delve further. The rub here is that a lawyer is required to provide all evidence/facts etc to the plaintiff. Bob could force Hodges to give it up imo. if there's anything to give up. btw..the information about the meeting with Maheu and brokers in Vegas I believe came from DreamWeaver in paltalk. She claimed at the time she could not ever disclose who told her husband the story due to hospital patient protection. So did Hodges just rely on the rumor or did she eventually give up the name. Good question.
|
|