Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 16, 2013 10:01:52 GMT -5
I too found that inconsistant and odd behavior of an atty with such a spoke about reputation as BH was the one to initiate this suit contacting AH, yet AH wont supply any evidence to his plaintiff. If BH was the one who started the suit then he is the one who holds the files. He had to convince Al with something to take the case. Something really smells here.. Ya think? JWLOB, you stated it concisely and precisely. Mike
|
|
|
Post by John Winston Lennon O'Boogie on Aug 16, 2013 10:34:32 GMT -5
I believe Bob did ask Hodges to look into this, but remember when emails were leaked of Hodges asking for evidence from different shareholders. Don't think Bob had anything more than what we all knew..and wanted Hodges to delve further. The rub here is that a lawyer is required to provide all evidence/facts etc to the plaintiff. Bob could force Hodges to give it up imo. if there's anything to give up. btw..the information about the meeting with Maheu and brokers in Vegas I believe came from DreamWeaver in paltalk. She claimed at the time she could not ever disclose who told her husband the story due to hospital patient protection. So did Hodges just rely on the rumor or did she eventually give up the name. Good question. If so, where does BH play in all this besides plaintiff..? What your saying is Hear-Say. Bob said he started it. No Lawyer takes on a case with Hear-Say.. We need hard Evidences.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 16, 2013 11:32:27 GMT -5
I believe Bob did ask Hodges to look into this, but remember when emails were leaked of Hodges asking for evidence from different shareholders. Don't think Bob had anything more than what we all knew..and wanted Hodges to delve further. The rub here is that a lawyer is required to provide all evidence/facts etc to the plaintiff. Bob could force Hodges to give it up imo. if there's anything to give up.i btw..the information about the meeting with Maheu and brokers in Vegas I believe came from DreamWeaver in paltalk. She claimed at the time she could not ever disclose who told her husband the story due to hospital patient protection. So did Hodges just rely on the rumor or did she eventually give up the name. Good question. If so, where does BH play in all this besides plaintiff..? What your saying is Hear-Say. Bob said he started it. No Lawyer takes on a case with Hear-Say.. We need hard Evidences. Mike
|
|
|
Post by BHollenegg on Aug 16, 2013 15:43:27 GMT -5
If BH was the one who started the suit then he is the one who holds the files. He had to convince Al with something to take the case. Something really smells here.. Unless I am misread BH first post on this thread, he clearly states that it was he that contacted AH. e362..you are confusing two different time periods. I provided how I first came in contact with Attorney Hodges and later the lawsuit. CEO Kevin West announced Hodges and Associates would be doing some work for CMKM Diamonds. I contacted Attorney Hodges in June 2008 and asked he could identify the funds and get something official to prove the funds exist for the shareholders' peace of mind. There were many rumors. Attorney Hodges confirmed there was a sting operation, the SEC was through investigating, the DTCC had the funds (record of the funds collected) at the time, the shareholders would get a good ROI, and that there was nothing that can be done to expedite the release because it was time event driven. Attorney Hodges also checked into all the rumors provided to verify if they were valid. In 2009, when the time event driven passed and the funds were not released, Attorney Hodges contacted me and said that something was wrong and he was filing a lawsuit. I said I would be one of the plaintiffs only if the shareholders were to benefit from this lawsuit. I explained to Attorney Hodges that I felt it was imperative to keep the shareholders informed as long as the information provided would not jeopardize the outcome of the fund release. Thank you, BHollenegg
|
|
|
Post by BHollenegg on Aug 16, 2013 15:56:47 GMT -5
I'm taking it that AH is not honoring your request Bob? ? Not yet. Thank you, BHollenegg
|
|
|
Post by John Winston Lennon O'Boogie on Aug 16, 2013 20:53:09 GMT -5
Unless I am misread BH first post on this thread, he clearly states that it was he that contacted AH. e362..you are confusing two different time periods. I provided how I first came in contact with Attorney Hodges and later the lawsuit. CEO Kevin West announced Hodges and Associates would be doing some work for CMKM Diamonds. I contacted Attorney Hodges in June 2008 and asked he could identify the funds and get something official to prove the funds exist for the shareholders' peace of mind. There were many rumors. Attorney Hodges confirmed there was a sting operation, the SEC was through investigating, the DTCC had the funds (record of the funds collected) at the time, the shareholders would get a good ROI, and that there was nothing that can be done to expedite the release because it was time event driven. Attorney Hodges also checked into all the rumors provided to verify if they were valid. In 2009, when the time event driven passed and the funds were not released, Attorney Hodges contacted me and said that something was wrong and he was filing a lawsuit. I said I would be one of the plaintiffs only if the shareholders were to benefit from this lawsuit. I explained to Attorney Hodges that I felt it was imperative to keep the shareholders informed as long as the information provided would not jeopardize the outcome of the fund release. Thank you, BHollenegg If the DTCC held the funds, why did he go after the SEC..? Please answer this for all the shareholders..
|
|
|
Post by marbearcat on Aug 16, 2013 21:02:59 GMT -5
I think because Al claimed the SEC were the, executor if you will, of the kitten kabootal.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 16, 2013 21:40:59 GMT -5
I think because Al claimed the SEC were the, executor if you will, of the kitten kabootal. ;D kitten kabootal ;D Mike
|
|
|
Post by BHollenegg on Aug 17, 2013 5:17:49 GMT -5
e362..you are confusing two different time periods. I provided how I first came in contact with Attorney Hodges and later the lawsuit. CEO Kevin West announced Hodges and Associates would be doing some work for CMKM Diamonds. I contacted Attorney Hodges in June 2008 and asked he could identify the funds and get something official to prove the funds exist for the shareholders' peace of mind. There were many rumors. Attorney Hodges confirmed there was a sting operation, the SEC was through investigating, the DTCC had the funds (record of the funds collected) at the time, the shareholders would get a good ROI, and that there was nothing that can be done to expedite the release because it was time event driven. Attorney Hodges also checked into all the rumors provided to verify if they were valid. In 2009, when the time event driven passed and the funds were not released, Attorney Hodges contacted me and said that something was wrong and he was filing a lawsuit. I said I would be one of the plaintiffs only if the shareholders were to benefit from this lawsuit. I explained to Attorney Hodges that I felt it was imperative to keep the shareholders informed as long as the information provided would not jeopardize the outcome of the fund release. Thank you, BHollenegg If the DTCC held the funds, why did he go after the SEC..? Please answer this for all the shareholders.. Funds and fund control were changed. Thank you, BHollenegg
|
|
|
Post by e362 on Aug 17, 2013 7:20:23 GMT -5
If the DTCC held the funds, why did he go after the SEC..? Please answer this for all the shareholders.. Funds and fund control were changed. Thank you, BHollenegg There is always a convenient and fluid excuse in cmkx land........
|
|
|
Post by timonesock on Aug 17, 2013 7:49:24 GMT -5
If the DTCC held the funds, why did he go after the SEC..? Please answer this for all the shareholders.. Funds and fund control were changed. Thank you, BHollenegg Here is an easy question that will go a long way in relieving shareholder anxiety! Bob have you seen verifiable proof of the trust? Not what you heard from Etrade but actual proof that AH says he has! You say you only want the best for the shareholders! It's time we get answers... It can't all start with you! I find it very curious that AH has ignored your request to give anyone but himself proof of a trust!
|
|
|
Post by John Winston Lennon O'Boogie on Aug 17, 2013 10:36:01 GMT -5
If the DTCC held the funds, why did he go after the SEC..? Please answer this for all the shareholders.. Funds and fund control were changed. Thank you, BHollenegg It's about time someone let us know.. Thanks Bob.
|
|
|
Post by John Winston Lennon O'Boogie on Aug 17, 2013 10:37:08 GMT -5
Funds and fund control were changed. Thank you, BHollenegg Here is an easy question that will go a long way in relieving shareholder anxiety! Bob have you seen verifiable proof of the trust? Not what you heard from Etrade but actual proof that AH says he has! You say you only want the best for the shareholders! It's time we get answers... It can't all start with you! I find it very curious that AH has ignored your request to give anyone but himself proof of a trust! Good luck on that question. I'm still waiting my reply..
|
|
|
Post by BHollenegg on Aug 17, 2013 13:23:40 GMT -5
Funds and fund control were changed. Thank you, BHollenegg Here is an easy question that will go a long way in relieving shareholder anxiety! Bob have you seen verifiable proof of the trust? Not what you heard from Etrade but actual proof that AH says he has! You say you only want the best for the shareholders! It's time we get answers... It can't all start with you! I find it very curious that AH has ignored your request to give anyone but himself proof of a trust! Timonesock, I have posted several times, you know what I know. I have provided all the information I was provided concerning the trust. The only trust account paperwork I saw was the Irrevocable Trust funds Urban set up. That was released by the Tyler Management. The statements amounts were doctored up...the numbers print style didn't match. That was before Attorney Hodges. This was a sting operation, therefore information sharing is tightly controlled. Attorney Hodges was well aware of the trust funds before I entered the picture. Thank you, BHollenegg
|
|
|
Post by timonesock on Aug 17, 2013 15:14:02 GMT -5
Here is an easy question that will go a long way in relieving shareholder anxiety! Bob have you seen verifiable proof of the trust? Not what you heard from Etrade but actual proof that AH says he has! You say you only want the best for the shareholders! It's time we get answers... It can't all start with you! I find it very curious that AH has ignored your request to give anyone but himself proof of a trust! Timonesock, I have posted several times, you know what I know. I have provided all the information I was provided concerning the trust. The only trust account paperwork I saw was the Irrevocable Trust funds Urban set up. That was released by the Tyler Management. The statements amounts were doctored up...the numbers print style didn't match. That was before Attorney Hodges. This was a sting operation, therefore information sharing is tightly controlled. Attorney Hodges was well aware of the trust funds before I entered the picture. Thank you, BHollenegg So he won't share that info with you or SK??? It's high time the shareholders are informed!! We have been treated like mushrooms long enough! Bob I think you mean well and I think your a good person! I think the time may have come for you to ask the tough questions from ah and if you don't get adequate answers it may be time to force the issue! If you believe in ALL your heart that AH has Proof of the trust and you believe that he has and is doing everything possible to release the trust to the shareholders and if you believe that the info he has is released to you or SK will compromise us getting that trust... I would like to know!! I think it's past time for the curtains to be pulled and WAY past time for the excuse that if the proof is released it would hurt our case!!! We are NOT mushrooms we don't need to be fed Sh1t and kept in the dark any longer!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|