|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 28, 2008 5:00:30 GMT -5
By: aladin99 27 Oct 2008, 10:24 PM EDT Msg. 774865 of 774888 Jump to msg. # today's news....fyi www.cmkmdiamondsinc.com/Shareholder_index.html By: joesixpack333 27 Oct 2008, 11:38 PM EDT Msg. 774872 of 774888 (This msg. is a reply to 774865 by aladin99.) Jump to msg. # aladin.. no offence to you but this is one big pile of cr@p.. if this is event driven.. we have had more events to power a 747 across the Atlantic.. what more forking events do we need... mark.. shove your falking question period that may or may not get some techno glitch that won't copy it... aahhhhh... that feels much better.. GO CMKX.. EOM
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 28, 2008 5:01:01 GMT -5
By: CHICPICK 27 Oct 2008, 11:04 PM EDT Msg. 774869 of 774888 (This msg. is a reply to 774867 by reality.bytes.) Jump to msg. #
Where did the money go? eom.
By: joesixpack333 28 Oct 2008, 12:03 AM EDT Msg. 774873 of 774888 (This msg. is a reply to 774869 by CHICPICK.) Jump to msg. #
CHICK.. our CMKX money didn't go anywhere..
it's locked in.. just waiting for the rest of this cr@p scenario to play out... IBM's moma didn't raise no fool... wasn't she a Casavant.. or was that his wife's moma... who knows anymore... ROFL..
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 28, 2008 5:02:14 GMT -5
By: reality.bytes 27 Oct 2008, 10:30 PM EDT Msg. 774867 of 774888 Jump to msg. #
New Casper Update... 10/27/2008
Money go Bye-Bye Money go Bye-Bye Money go Bye-Bye Money go Bye-Bye Money go Bye-Bye Money go Bye-Bye Money go Bye-Bye Money go Bye-Bye Money go Bye-Bye Money go Bye-Bye Money go Bye-Bye Money go Bye-Bye Money go Bye-Bye Money go Bye-Bye Money go Bye-Bye Money go Bye-Bye Money go Bye-Bye Money go Bye-Bye Money go Bye-Bye Money go Bye-Bye Money go Bye-Bye Money go Bye-Bye Money go Bye-Bye Money go Bye-Bye Money go Bye-Bye Money go Bye-Bye Money go Bye-Bye Money go Bye-Bye Money go Bye-Bye Money go Bye-Bye Money go Bye-Bye Money go Bye-Bye Money go Bye-Bye Money go Bye-Bye Money go Bye-Bye Money go Bye-Bye Money go Bye-Bye Money go Bye-Bye Money go Bye-Bye Money go Bye-Bye Money go Bye-Bye Money go Bye-Bye Money go Bye-Bye Money go Bye-Bye Money go Bye-Bye Money go Bye-Bye Money go Bye-Bye Money go Bye-Bye Money go Bye-Bye Money go Bye-Bye
By: joesixpack333 28 Oct 2008, 12:06 AM EDT Msg. 774874 of 774888 (This msg. is a reply to 774867 by reality.bytes.) Jump to msg. #
reality... you got that right...
CITI money go buh-bye.. WAMU money go buh-bye.. and on and on... buh-bye... where did it go... ROFL
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 28, 2008 5:03:56 GMT -5
By: jlecks 27 Oct 2008, 11:36 PM EDT Msg. 774871 of 774888 Jump to msg. # Any Profiling experts want to tell us why EVERY "new Team" communication tells us, ad nauseam, that we were left with $558.00 and that they are [paraphrasically] only doing this to "save/help the shareholders"? Man, I gotta admit I am so sick of this, "It's all for the shareholders" propaganda BS. 4.5 years of that fuggin' line -- Yeah, it's beyond stale and moldy. Can't the "new Team" come up with a new slogan? Jeez, guys, maybe you can sell that one to Obama or McCain, seems anyone can use that to manipulate and distract people from the what the hell is really going on. Seems some people want to convince us of something, quite literally, very badly; indeed, quite desperately. Serious and professional folk don't do this... That's a fact. Their actions (professionals) require no chronic repetition of such BS. Real men act; Posers want sympathy... Read that last sentence again... Now, read it again. So, they want some questions... Well, hell, I'd like to pose my series of questions: Okey-Dokey, "new Team." Please tell me how I am supposed to trust you when: 1) The company is now being influenced and financed by a group of Private Investors. 2) You fail to tell us who these Private Investors are. 3) You fail to tell us how much money these Private Investors have invested. 4) You fail to tell us how much money these Private Investors will take/gain/pocket from the hard-earned money that the original group of injured, blighted, lied-to, and abused shareholders laid out for the original company -- If you can get your fat-little hands on it. If you ain't got the balls to answer them four questions; you ain't worth believing in or listening to. JMO By: joesixpack333 28 Oct 2008, 12:18 AM EDT Msg. 774875 of 774888 (This msg. is a reply to 774871 by jlecks.) Jump to msg. # jlecks... i agree... something is up with that 558.. pretty obvious nothing can run on that amount of money.. so it has to mean something else... hmmm... so on that note and IMHO only.. it has to have some ulterior meaning... me thinks... that the conglomerate will IPO somewhere around that figure.. or at least run up to it.. they just announced that big diamond.. hmmm.. wonder how many more of those big suckers were found.. so.. IMHO again... 558.. is the new .54 ... now, how many shares we can get in the new conglomerate is up for grabs.. but I suspect the CIM divi was a clue... who knows... By: factanonverba13 28 Oct 2008, 02:51 AM EDT Msg. 774879 of 774888 (This msg. is a reply to 774871 by jlecks.) Jump to msg. # Well, jlecks, my opinion is that they will stick with this 'saving the stock holders' line until a significant enough # of people will not put up with it any longer. For now, it is working. Some of you folks have voiced disenchantment, but it seems the vast majority are either satisfied, aren't upset enough to say anything, or just do not care and have already mentally written this off as a loss. i think you know where i stand on this. All the charades, in the end, will not mean a hill of beans. if you ever recover even a nickel on the dollar, it will be from the efforts of the SEC, not Frizzy, West or the Faulking charlatan. I do believe this whole thing is for their benefit, the benefit of their clients and benefactors ... and not the shareholders. So far, you must admit i have been right. Frizzy the LapDog has gotten paid, West the ChewToy has gotten paid, looks like the Faulking idiot is getting paid, but none of you have seen one red cent ... have you? Man, I gotta admit I am so sick of this, "It's all for the shareholders" propaganda BS. 4.5 years of that fuggin' line --
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 28, 2008 5:11:10 GMT -5
By: rosencrantz2010 28 Oct 2008, 04:03 AM EDT Msg. 774880 of 774888 Jump to msg. #
nine weeks since urban's no-show and still no summary judgement.
every time i log in i expect to see news of the summary judgement.
where is that summary judgement?
why is it taking so long?
TYLER, where is that summary judgement?
TYLER, do you even care anymore?
nine weeks. heck, more than nine weeks.
nine weeks. heck, more than nine weeks.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Oct 28, 2008 12:05:55 GMT -5
By: rosencrantz2010 28 Oct 2008, 08:45 AM EDT Msg. 774900 of 775015 (This msg. is a reply to 774896 by stockfred.) Jump to msg. #
holy craaap, how long does it take? you have the money from edwards. you have the old deals with shane, star and united. you know who all the shareholders are. the financials can be done in a few weeks.
soooooooooo!
what's the friggin' hold up? and yet, our NEW (third-urban, kevin and now mark) ceo says,
"I know this has been a long and frustrating experience for CMKM shareholders, but this is not a situation that can be resolved overnight (ain't that the truth! it's been over three years!!). Considering the irrefutable fact that Kevin West took over a company whose prior management defrauded its own shareholders (so, where is the summary judgement and why aren't you guys pissssing and moaning to the judge about the delay in issuing it?!!) of an estimated $250 million (these would be the funds the summary judgement would give you and yet you don't say a thing!!), and that the former CEO left only $558 in the bank, I believe a great deal has been accomplished in keeping this company alive (HOW?!!!!). THIS COMPANY IS AND WILL CONTINUE TO MOVE FORWARD, but it takes time (I GUESS! 4-5 years soon!). I hope shareholders can be patient (PATIENT!! MY GOD, YOU ASK US TO BE PATIENT AFTER #_$ YEARS?!!! YOU MUST BE KIDDING!!) and respectful of the effort expended by those who are working on their behalf."
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Oct 28, 2008 12:08:03 GMT -5
By: rosencrantz2010 28 Oct 2008, 09:00 AM EDT Msg. 774903 of 775016 (This msg. is a reply to 774900 by rosencrantz2010.) Jump to msg. # honestly, can you imagine a guy that's been doing some body work on your car and promised he would have it back to you in a week tells you that he's not finished and needs just a little more time, ohhh, let's say, another week. you'd be a little frustrated but then you'd probably say, well, okay. then a month later he says he still has some work to do on it but it should be done soon. then six months later he says he's almost done and needs just a little more time. then, you learn he's sold his business but not to worry because the new owner is real good at auto body work, and fast. then after another 6 months the new owner tells you he's not sure he has your car but that he might be able to find it, but to be patient because he's checking. in the meantime, the money you prepaid for the auto body work has been spent by the previous owner and there is not much he can do for you to get that back, nor can he locate your car at that time. then after about three years of this bullshiiiit, he becomes a little indignant at your show of frustration and asks you to be just a little more patient because he is doing all he can to fix the problem and he would appreciate it if you would shut the fuuuuck up because he's got important work. so, close your trap, sit down and be quite while he goes about his business. maybe he'll get back to you in a few years, after he locates your car. By: goodolboy27 28 Oct 2008, 09:08 AM EDT Msg. 774905 of 775016 (This msg. is a reply to 774903 by rosencrantz2010.) Jump to msg. # rosen, can you imagine a mechanic quoting you a price to fix your car, and then turning around and asking you if you have any idea how to fix it? Seems to me that's exactly what Mark just did in this last announcement of his: "if anyone has constructive ideas as to how to move the company forward in a positive way, we are always open to those ideas."
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Oct 28, 2008 12:09:21 GMT -5
By: jfarn 27 Jun 2007, 04:18 PM EDT Msg. 567304 of 774900 (This msg. is a reply to 567060 by imsoweary.) Jump to msg. # Ask Bill the following IMSO...
Bill you're sitting in one of the Captain's chairs due to your work re: NSS and CMKX...
Why is: OG web site/data - gone?....
Where has the language gone about our short exceeding 1.5 trillion? ...
Where is the language about uniting due to the fact that were handed a naked short on a silver platter?
Wny and all discussion oral/written about the DTC facilitating the NSS been muted?
Where is the discussion of any NSS focus in ANY CEO updates?
We are going after little civil fish re: the fraud that was exacted on us..Why haven't we targeted big game?
Where is the follow up from the 20+ companies that pulled OBO/NOBO's from months ago?
Where is our Interplead effort?
What is the status of our Cert pull effort?
Who is funding their endeavor?
Why haven't we named Roger Glenn, Bob Maheu, and Don Stocklien as of yet?
Other than the little blurb re: FTD's and Susan T., Why have both you and John have have put the NSS mission on the shelf considering it was your mission, focus, and bread and butter for years? Shareholders need to hear your rationale expressed in written form in lieu of phone explanations and John Martin on the radio with Mark Faulk. Speak up.
Bill, you shut down your practice and dedicated your professional life for quite a period of time in "proving the short"...mountains of evidence...faxes...statistical analysis...written statements noting that "we proved a short a long time ago". The meeting with Hakala...threats from the SEC to not pull paper in an attempt to trigger a short squeeze...information presented to Government officials at the highest level...and now you shelve the attack and go after small potatoes? Why?? NSS is in the forefront of the news...why go silent now Bill?
Bill, do you really think that at this stage of the game that WE are going to buy this turn of direction?
Time to speak up with regard to this and many other topics Bill. You can't have it both ways. And please don't tell us you're too busy with civil litigation to explain why you can't address your missive over the last two years.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Oct 28, 2008 12:12:27 GMT -5
By: jfarn 28 Oct 2008, 09:03 AM EDT Msg. 774904 of 775019 (This msg. is a reply to 774901 by jfarn.) Jump to msg. # 04 Oct 2006, 06:28 PM EDT Msg. 394291 of 394297 Jump to msg. # Re: Helen B. Look at the hearing transcript and what Don S. was trying to ask her on pages 164 concerning the "share borrow program" (notice he called it by its incorrect name) and Helen's ultimate response. Things to consider: Leslie's immediate objection Why Judge M. decided to overrule Don's intention for asking the question AND his commentary re: being quick about it All about the OS... SEC's focus on maintaining such a NARROW scope is very telling and all set up by asking about Helen about the "share borrow program" I don't know of such a thing...Good answer Ms. B. www.cmkxownersgroup.com/HearingTranscript.pdf (pages 164-167)� - - - - - By: rosencrantz2010 28 Oct 2008, 09:09 AM EDT Msg. 774906 of 775020 (This msg. is a reply to 774904 by jfarn.) Jump to msg. # they were the ones that broke the law. we didn't. there is no reason we should be made to pay for their crime. the SEC should feel the heat, directly or indirectly (through our CEO & BOD by telling them that they are sitting on a boiling pot with the pressure building) and move this thing along. the money is out there. available to be paid. those that haven't paid their fair share should be given another week, after 2 years of delay, and then thrown in the slammer when they don't pay up. the SEC should be humiliated and made to suffer. if URBAN is the MAIN crook then where is that summary judgement?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Oct 28, 2008 12:16:10 GMT -5
By: rosencrantz2010 28 Oct 2008, 09:00 AM EDT Msg. 774903 of 775016 (This msg. is a reply to 774900 by rosencrantz2010.) Jump to msg. # honestly, can you imagine a guy that's been doing some body work on your car and promised he would have it back to you in a week tells you that he's not finished and needs just a little more time, ohhh, let's say, another week. you'd be a little frustrated but then you'd probably say, well, okay. then a month later he says he still has some work to do on it but it should be done soon. then six months later he says he's almost done and needs just a little more time. then, you learn he's sold his business but not to worry because the new owner is real good at auto body work, and fast. then after another 6 months the new owner tells you he's not sure he has your car but that he might be able to find it, but to be patient because he's checking. in the meantime, the money you prepaid for the auto body work has been spent by the previous owner and there is not much he can do for you to get that back, nor can he locate your car at that time. then after about three years of this bullshiiiit, he becomes a little indignant at your show of frustration and asks you to be just a little more patient because he is doing all he can to fix the problem and he would appreciate it if you would shut the fuuuuck up because he's got important work. so, close your trap, sit down and be quite while he goes about his business. maybe he'll get back to you in a few years, after he locates your car. By: goodolboy27 28 Oct 2008, 09:08 AM EDT Msg. 774905 of 775016 (This msg. is a reply to 774903 by rosencrantz2010.) Jump to msg. # rosen, can you imagine a mechanic quoting you a price to fix your car, and then turning around and asking you if you have any idea how to fix it? Seems to me that's exactly what Mark just did in this last announcement of his: "if anyone has constructive ideas as to how to move the company forward in a positive way, we are always open to those ideas." By: rosencrantz2010 28 Oct 2008, 09:12 AM EDT Msg. 774908 of 775021 (This msg. is a reply to 774905 by goodolboy27.) Jump to msg. # goodolboy, yeah, you're right. they either don't know squat or they're pimping the shareholders by daring us to come up with a better plan. he's basically saying, "okay, smart guy. if you think you have a better plan then show us." of course, he refuses to tell us what the fuuuuuck their plan is so how in the helllll can we figure out whether or not our plan is any better?!! before we can advise them they need to tell us what they are doing, which, of course, they refuse to do. ever heard of CATCH-22? LOL
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Oct 28, 2008 12:18:29 GMT -5
By: jfarn 28 Oct 2008, 09:23 AM EDT Msg. 774910 of 775021 Jump to msg. # Goodolboy, hop on the way back machine....http://www.archive.org/index.php
on a side note: Visionary? Lucky? July 05.
By: jay_adobe 23 Jul 2005, 08:40 PM EDT Msg. 1051081 of 1308040 Jump to msg. # thingyy, Actually, I expected the brokers to be calling clients already offering to waive the fee to send them their certs. That isn't happening yet, though, that I have heard about anyway.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Oct 28, 2008 12:19:56 GMT -5
By: rosencrantz2010 28 Oct 2008, 09:26 AM EDT Msg. 774912 of 775023 Jump to msg. #
this morning i saw where jp morgan, merrill and goldman sachs have EACH put aside about $6b in cash for year-end bonuses. (in other words, $18b total!)
and the SEC and our CEO and BOD can't find enough money to just cover our initial investment?
what complete bullshiiit.
630b shares times .0005 (let's say that's the average CMKX price) = $0.315b. ($315m)
in other words, the guys that naked shorted us to death are looking at paying out roughly 20 times more in cash bonuses to their executives this christmas while we sit here in the dark like mushrooms being TOLD by our CEO to shut-up and be more patient because they are working reeeeal hard for us.
yeah, mark, bill and kevin, that's a real endearing strategy. that's the way to appease shareholders. just keep telling them to shut the fuuuuck up because they don't know jack, and that you'll get back to them when you are good and ready.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Oct 28, 2008 12:33:26 GMT -5
An old update of Frizzell's.......... boy the tune sure has changed By: jfarn 28 Oct 2008, 09:27 AM EDT Msg. 774914 of 775026 Jump to msg. # four corners: Dear CMKX Shareholders, You have not received any updates of late because I am in receipt of no information to give you. Kevin West is very much aware that you are in need of information and I know if he were able to give you information he would do so. I do not know why he cannot respond to you. It is my understanding that the interpleader is being drafted and it will be filed sooner than later. I have been given no time schedule. I decided to do this brief update because a few board posters have been having quite a time publishing false information and involving me by name in their posts. It has been reported that I have been involved in some settlement negotiations and that I have orchestrated some deal involving tax free benefits. There is absolutely no truth to these rumors. The creator of these rumors has committed a terrible disservice to his or her fellow shareholders by disseminating false information. The connection of these rumors to actions that I have allegedly taken personally is not only false but may subject someone to legal liability if it was proven that such information was disseminated maliciously. The reasons for this long period of no information are unknown to me. If you want to speculate that there is a problem getting some settlement deal worked out, feel free to think that way. I am aware of no facts that will support such a thought process. I hope for all the shareholders (myself included) that there is something going on that is beneficial to us. It is simply an outright lie for someone to state that I have been personally involved in such negotiations, when I have not be so involved. Unfortunately, these type of rumors sometimes cause people to make buying or selling decisions even though this stock is not a publicly traded stock. I have received several well intentioned emails from shareholders suggesting that I or the company should take some legal action and direct that cease and desist orders be put in place to stop such nonsense. I do not represent the company nor can I speak for their intentions in this regard. I know of no lawsuit nor legal action that can be taken which would cause a Judge somewhere to order that the general public should stop posting lies or unfounded rumors on message boards. I am not trying to be facetious or sarcastic in saying this. There is simply no legal process that I am aware of which can be invoked to stop this nonsense. I wish I had actual information to impart to you. I will continue to ask Urban and Kevin to followup with their last press release and begin to let you know what is going on with the company. Best Regards, Onward, Bill
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Oct 28, 2008 12:46:06 GMT -5
By: rosencrantz2010 28 Oct 2008, 09:32 AM EDT Msg. 774917 of 775034 Jump to msg. #
TYLER, if URBAN is the big bad MAIN FRAUDSTER then why hesitate? has URBAN scared you? has he turned you into sissy boys?
TYLER, you keep mouthing all that tough talk but when it comes to crunch time you sit there with your mouth shut. where's the machismo? i thought you guys were going to take care of business?
if URBAN is the KINGPIN (you keep saying he is) then why let him escape?
By: rosencrantz2010 28 Oct 2008, 09:35 AM EDT Msg. 774919 of 775035 Jump to msg. #
TYLER, tell us what excuse the judge is giving you when you call and ask, "hey, judge! where is our friggin' summary judgement? the main bad guy laughed in your face nine weeks ago and you still haven't issued the summary judgement! what's the holdup?"
so, TYLER, please, tell us what excuse the judge is giving you about why he hasn't been able to get around to issuing the summary judgement to URBAN.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Oct 28, 2008 12:50:54 GMT -5
on no...... he's back !! was nice while it lastedBy: lilburrito0 28 Oct 2008, 10:05 AM EDT Msg. 774932 of 775035 Jump to msg. # Rosen _ It's over _ CMKM Shareholders lost _ Time to get on with your life. By: goodolboy27 28 Oct 2008, 10:16 AM EDT Msg. 774936 of 775035 (This msg. is a reply to 774932 by lilburrito0.) Jump to msg. # lilburrito, have you had a change of heart? By: lilburrito0 28 Oct 2008, 10:20 AM EDT Msg. 774937 of 775035 (This msg. is a reply to 774936 by goodolboy27.) Jump to msg. # goodolboy27 _ When one of the largest Law-Firms in the country looked over the evidence and refused to take the CMKM case against the Government, Brokers and Lawyers __ That tells me it’s over! By: gusjarvis 28 Oct 2008, 10:36 AM EDT Msg. 774952 of 775035 (This msg. is a reply to 774937 by lilburrito0.) Jump to msg. # thank god we had the bulldog or who knows were we would be now By: leowanta 28 Oct 2008, 11:19 AM EDT Msg. 774963 of 775035 (This msg. is a reply to 774937 by lilburrito0.) Jump to msg. # he he he he he i won't say "i told ya so" pedro.... federal officials have immunity under the law.... and NO, CMKXERS have not lost, we've won actually.... it's called ACCOUNTABILITY....that's the way of restitution, and we are there folks.... thank you very much lilburrito0...Tyler can close up shop, they have no reason to hang around after our payday.....TYLER was always "just a name" with no function....the SEC was always in control....the final rule on T+3 was our SETTLEMENT folks..... Thank You Father
|
|