|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Nov 2, 2008 10:55:57 GMT -5
By: rosencrantz2010 02 Nov 2008, 08:24 AM EST Msg. 776200 of 776263 Jump to msg. # 630B shares in certs. 39k shareholders reporting. 21k shareholders still not counted and only 75B shares remaining. By: jfarn 02 Nov 2008, 08:30 AM EST Msg. 776202 of 776263 (This msg. is a reply to 776200 by rosencrantz2010.) Jump to msg. # Lets not forget that the individuals not accounted for are MIA for good reason. By: rosencrantz2010 02 Nov 2008, 08:33 AM EST Msg. 776204 of 776263 (This msg. is a reply to 776200 by rosencrantz2010.) Jump to msg. # jfarn, i do remember kevin's statements about how unfair and insensitive it was that shareholders weren't being told what was happening! and he wanted us all to know that he was going to fix things because he was one of us! LOL that was when he was on the outside looking in and knew exactly how it felt to be one of the mushrooms being kept in the dark while being fed manure. now kevin's on the inside and feeling fat and happy. nothing to fret about or worry his little head over since he's been told what he didn't know two years ago. now that he's been told he's happy, and, "screww the rest of 'em." "gee, i wish i could tell you guys but i'm sorry, you'll just have to wait another couple of years and then maybe we'll tell you something,,, maybe." Now. correct me if I am wrong.... but weren't we told that the figures/count DID NOT even include foreign accounts ??By: goodolboy27 02 Nov 2008, 08:39 AM EST Msg. 776206 of 776264 (This msg. is a reply to 776202 by jfarn.) Jump to msg. # jfar, what possible reason could that be? That cloak and dagger nonsense is getting old. The majority of shares not counted so far are held by insiders, held by brokerage firms in the brokerage's name, and those that wrote this nonsense off long ago. Oh, and a few others that refuse to turn them in. By: jfarn 02 Nov 2008, 09:30 AM EST Msg. 776230 of 776264 (This msg. is a reply to 776206 by goodolboy27.) Jump to msg. # The majority of shares not counted so far are held by insiders, (correct and in quantity amounts that greatly exceed the numbers held by the average cmkm shareholder) held by brokerage firms in the brokerage's name, (correct)Those brokerages have been watched very closely by a myriad of parties) and those that wrote this nonsense off long ago. (Correct---but one of our fellow shareholders and former company attorney has created a safety net for these folks who will undoubtedly be upset with what is to come) Good ole boy, you said it all for me this morning when you articulated a fondness for that racist, mentally disturbed character who visits this forum daily. I understand where your coming from.~
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Nov 2, 2008 11:01:57 GMT -5
By: wheres_nufcedd 02 Nov 2008, 08:47 AM EST Msg. 776211 of 776265 Jump to msg. #
Rosie - heres a FACT: Helen said cert holders r registered - we know 39,000 registered 639 Billion shares - SEC lady also told me cert holders r registered - Helen said the 622 Billion/40,000 shareholders r seperate from us - THOSE R FACTS!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Nov 2, 2008 11:26:42 GMT -5
By: rosencrantz2010 02 Nov 2008, 08:53 AM EST Msg. 776215 of 776279 Jump to msg. # what i don't understand is why TYLER behaves as though they no power. why are they so afraid to take action? why are they so afraid to speak out? it's as though the SEC or the DOJ or URBAN or whoever has told them to "shut the fuuuck up, sit down and eat your peas," and that's exactly what they are doing. but, for the life of me i don't understand why they don't push back? why aren't they TELLING the SEC or DOJ or URBAN, "we represent 60,000 shareholders that have been screeeewed, in one fashion or another, we want things made right and after years of waiting we want action, now." maybe they've already said that. that's possible. but what were they told in response? and they must have thought it was reasonable. for example, were they told that everything was being worked out and that to give it a little more time? but after all this many years wouldn't you think they would push back just a little by saying something like, "hey, SEC, after our shareholders have been treated like shiiiit for the last four years we feel this has gone on long enough and we want it to end in three months." so, why not give the SEC another three months after which they go public? why not go public TYLER? why not reveal the information you have? sure, they'll say, "you go public and we'll never pay you!" after all this time i'd say, "fuuuuck you! fine! and we'll just see what the other agencies of the government responsible for protecting the American investor thinks of your mishandling of this crime and what the American public thinks of your criminal activity!" really, after all this time you would think TYLER would have had enough and would be threatening to play hardball with someone. wouldn't you? after being made to look the fool, wouldn't you think TYLER would be laying down the law to the others? wouldn't TYLER tell everyone involved, "okay, people. X more months and we're going to the press with what we have. and you can threaten us (TYLER) all you like because i know i can bring down a mountain of craaap on you, and you know it. so, you better get this wrapped up and reported in four weeks (after years!) or as representatives of 60,000 CMKX shareholders we are going to the press." By: wheres_nufcedd 02 Nov 2008, 08:55 AM EST Msg. 776216 of 776279 (This msg. is a reply to 776215 by rosencrantz2010.) Jump to msg. # rosie - read your cert - and see what names r on those certs By: rosencrantz2010 02 Nov 2008, 09:08 AM EST Msg. 776221 of 776279 (This msg. is a reply to 776216 by wheres_nufcedd.) Jump to msg. # wheres-nufcedd, then i'd tell URBAN, "you have three months to get this wrapped up because after that we're dumping this cartload of manure we've been pushing for you and the others on the doorstep of the largest newspapers and TV stations. we have scheduled a press conference at the National Press Club ( npc.press.org/host/ ) for November 24, monday, where we will reveal details of the crime. we have prepared our presentation detailing not only the criminal activity that occurred over the last five years but also the illegal masking of that crime by government officials." they'll whine, "but you said we had three months!" lol
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Nov 2, 2008 11:35:50 GMT -5
By: wheres_nufcedd 02 Nov 2008, 09:40 AM EST Msg. 776241 of 776283 (This msg. is a reply to 776238 by jfarn.) Jump to msg. # thanks jfarn - i will tell u this: I have called Als office upteen times with no responce - lil pissed at Al for not returning a call - even if he just said Hi but cant talk would have been enough for me and Al Hodges has visited us here on PB29.... although he seems to have disappeared after we exchanged PM's.... By: jfarn 02 Nov 2008, 09:49 AM EST Msg. 776246 of 776283 (This msg. is a reply to 776241 by wheres_nufcedd.) Jump to msg. # thingyy, Ask for his assistant. IMO, Al has an inflated sense of self when it comes to taking calls. He means well though. His assistant/colleague will get back to you. Believe it or not, he (his colleague)even posts on this thread and has done so within the last 24 hours. jf~
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Nov 2, 2008 11:41:54 GMT -5
By: gusjarvis 02 Nov 2008, 09:53 AM EST Msg. 776248 of 776284 Jump to msg. # 1.That on or about the 5th day of September 2004 the bank was served with a subpoena with regard to accounts maintained at the branch plaintiff supervised. Certain executives of defendants (Silver State Bancorp, Silver State Bank) owned stock in companies controlled by the subject of the subpoena and became disconcerted when the bank was served with the aforementioned subpoena. so remember that date sept 5 2004, that is when at the very very latest all was known about urban and je and the scam, allllll. June 16 2004 biz.yahoo.com/bw/040616/165891_1.html Recap: D Roger Glenn was retained to work with securities and corporate issues faced by the company. Glenn stated, "We have been retained by the company to resolve the problems it has been facing, and we expect to DEVOTE SIGNIFICANT EFFORTS IMMEDIATELY toward that goal." August 2 biz.yahoo.com/bw/040802/25741_1.html Recap: CMKX announced today that it has ELECTED to distribute the 95,502,027 shares of Juina Mining Corp. which were recently purchased by the company as a DIVIDEND TO ITS SHAREHOLDERS. The company has chosen Oct. 1, 2004 (THE FIRST CONFIRMED DATE), as the record and distribution date for this LATEST dividend to its shareholders. three days before the subpoena LAS VEGAS--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Sept. 2, 2004--CMKM Diamonds Inc. (Pink Sheets:CMKX - News) is pleased to announce that the Company has finalized a joint venture agreement where St. George Metals, Inc. (Pink Sheets:SGGM - News) will purchase a 5% unencumbered and absolute interest in any and all mineral claims held by CMKM Diamonds, Inc. in consideration for $10,000,000 US Dollars and two hundred billion (200,000,000,000) restricted shares of SGGM. The Company has received a $2,500,000 payment with three additional payments of $2,500,000 anticipated within the next 30 days. There is no guarantee that further exploration or drilling will produce any economic benefit to the company or the shareholders of the company. sept. 5 subpoenas now after john edwards was caught and urban caught and roger knowing this www.fbruhm.proboards3.com/index.cgi?board=cmkmdoc&action=display&thread=4510 wow if that wasn't enough this amazing info from oct nov 2004 (and ps look for the shore gold BUY) www.fbruhm.proboards3.com/index.cgi? board=cmkmdoc&action=display&thread=4502 we are just fine!
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Nov 2, 2008 11:44:31 GMT -5
By: gusjarvis 02 Nov 2008, 09:53 AM EST Msg. 776248 of 776284 Jump to msg. # 1.That on or about the 5th day of September 2004 the bank was served with a subpoena with regard to accounts maintained at the branch plaintiff supervised. Certain executives of defendants (Silver State Bancorp, Silver State Bank) owned stock in companies controlled by the subject of the subpoena and became disconcerted when the bank was served with the aforementioned subpoena. so remember that date sept 5 2004, that is when at the very very latest all was known about urban and je and the scam, allllll. June 16 2004 biz.yahoo.com/bw/040616/165891_1.html Recap: D Roger Glenn was retained to work with securities and corporate issues faced by the company. Glenn stated, "We have been retained by the company to resolve the problems it has been facing, and we expect to DEVOTE SIGNIFICANT EFFORTS IMMEDIATELY toward that goal." August 2 biz.yahoo.com/bw/040802/25741_1.html Recap: CMKX announced today that it has ELECTED to distribute the 95,502,027 shares of Juina Mining Corp. which were recently purchased by the company as a DIVIDEND TO ITS SHAREHOLDERS. The company has chosen Oct. 1, 2004 (THE FIRST CONFIRMED DATE), as the record and distribution date for this LATEST dividend to its shareholders. three days before the subpoena LAS VEGAS--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Sept. 2, 2004--CMKM Diamonds Inc. (Pink Sheets:CMKX - News) is pleased to announce that the Company has finalized a joint venture agreement where St. George Metals, Inc. (Pink Sheets:SGGM - News) will purchase a 5% unencumbered and absolute interest in any and all mineral claims held by CMKM Diamonds, Inc. in consideration for $10,000,000 US Dollars and two hundred billion (200,000,000,000) restricted shares of SGGM. The Company has received a $2,500,000 payment with three additional payments of $2,500,000 anticipated within the next 30 days. There is no guarantee that further exploration or drilling will produce any economic benefit to the company or the shareholders of the company. sept. 5 subpoenas now after john edwards was caught and urban caught and roger knowing this www.fbruhm.proboards3.com/index.cgi?board=cmkmdoc&action=display&thread=4510 wow if that wasn't enough this amazing info from oct nov 2004 (and ps look for the shore gold BUY) www.fbruhm.proboards3.com/index.cgi? board=cmkmdoc&action=display&thread=4502 we are just fine! By: gusjarvis 02 Nov 2008, 10:00 AM EST Msg. 776252 of 776284 (This msg. is a reply to 776248 by gusjarvis.) Jump to msg. # this is the oct info and remember roger was still here for the sggm transaction that came right during and after the ssbank subpoenas www.fbruhm.proboards3.com/index.cgi?board=cmkmdoc&action=display&thread=4502 By: jfarn 02 Nov 2008, 10:08 AM EST Msg. 776254 of 776284 (This msg. is a reply to 776248 by gusjarvis.) Jump to msg. # Great work Gus!
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Nov 2, 2008 12:03:25 GMT -5
By: aloha_joe2 02 Nov 2008, 10:59 AM EST Msg. 776265 of 776291 Jump to msg. #
"Stock dilution on the CMKM scale
cannot occur without stock brokers ignoring the trading rules in place by the regulators. Market makers control the bid and the ask and virtually dictate the fortunes or losses that occur during a normal trading day. The price of the stock is not guided by Company success or problems, but by sheer manipulation from the key players in the market. Brokers must ignore SARS reporting requirements and allow activities like the John Edwards trades for the CMKM story to unfold. Trades are allowed "ex-clearing" and accepted in the market place as a simple accommodation to the parties. It takes individuals like those that attended the initial meeting of the funding group in CMKM who understand how to dilute a stock and make fortunes in the process. It takes cooperation with every entity in the financial marketplace for dilution to occur on the scale that was accomplished in CMKM stock.
In order for large quantity trades like those occurring in CMKM a promoter must have lawyers, auditors, a transfer agent, and market makers who are willing to bend their own ethical rules and in some cases industry standards to facilitate such dilution. The naming of Does 1-50 represents the individuals that will be pursued by CMKM for the acts of stock manipulation, self-dealing and professional negligence. The naming of Roe Corporations 1-50 represents the companies that will be pursued by CMKM for their involvement in this massive dilution and market manipulation."
Big Fish...
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Nov 2, 2008 12:12:50 GMT -5
By: aloha_joe2 02 Nov 2008, 11:13 AM EST Msg. 776271 of 776294 Jump to msg. #
Frizzell: "we proved NSS in this company a long time ago"
Sept 30, 2005
Greetings Group Members,
I have received several emails of late inquiring about our naked short investigation. We have continued to tally shares by people that have sent their statements to us but the numbers are not changing significantly. We proved a huge naked short position in this company a long time ago. Our documentation substantiates 482 billion shares (approximately) owned by 11557 shareholders. This does not include cert holders. There remains approximately 48000 shareholders that have not sent us their holdings. By my estimates there are at least a trillion and a half shares that have been sold in CMKX stock. When all shares (including foreign and obo accounts) are added to the mix, the total could exceed two trillion shares. Have a good weekend.
Onward,
Bill
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Nov 2, 2008 12:22:55 GMT -5
By: elo54 01 Nov 2008, 09:14 PM EDT Msg. 776119 of 776174 (This msg. is a reply to 776107 by darlingdaphne.) Jump to msg. # Last time Urban met Kevin in Vegas he got Kevin to cash a check and then proceeded to take it all.Kevin had to plead with him to pay for his hotel room.Yeah a real PAL our Urban!!!!Left us with $500 So until you start contributing to paying Kevin's salary then I suggest you keep quiet until this all unfolds.You will be very angry when the DOJ present their case imo and your anger will not be for Kevin or Bill,yeah you guessed right,ITS OUR PAL,a real patriot if ever there was one lol!!! ELO Where is Elo getting his information?? Could it be from Faulk's fiction?? "The Naked Truth"? <sigh> Single Sure doesn't say much for KW's smarts, does it? He still kept touting UC after that!!
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Nov 2, 2008 12:31:40 GMT -5
By: snoopstock613 02 Nov 2008, 12:18 PM EST Msg. 776297 of 776299 Jump to msg. #
Aladin, if you go back over the 12/31/2004 shareholder list, sorted by SHAREHOLDER ACCOUNTS, you will find interesting coincidences between Casavant family surrendered shares against the shares retired back to the treasury.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Nov 2, 2008 12:35:16 GMT -5
By: aloha_joe2 02 Nov 2008, 10:48 AM EST Msg. 776262 of 776300 Jump to msg. #
Bud Burrell quote --
CMKX - "no fewer than three Federal criminal informants involved in the deal before the stock started trading"...
By: gusjarvis 02 Nov 2008, 12:10 PM EST Msg. 776295 of 776301 (This msg. is a reply to 776262 by aloha_joe2.) Jump to msg. #
aloha and why won't mark talk about that but continues to pretend we don't know all this, sad
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Nov 2, 2008 12:37:11 GMT -5
By: wheres_nufcedd 02 Nov 2008, 12:24 PM EST Msg. 776299 of 776302 Jump to msg. #
former management campaigned "GOT CMKX?" and the crooks ran with it - opps dare it is - opps dare it is - LARGEST NAKED SHORT N THE HISTORY OF THE STOCK MARKET
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Nov 2, 2008 12:38:06 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Nov 2, 2008 12:44:41 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Nov 2, 2008 12:45:22 GMT -5
BHollenegg DIAMOND JEDI MASTER Re: It's Been A Pleasure (Acca related posts) « Reply #6799 Today at 12:39pm »
As many times as I have read this notice from the DTC, it just hit me that the DTC expects bona fide shareholders to surrender their CMKM Diamond shares in exchange for the Entourage shares.
Subject: Distribution of Entourage Shares Upon Surrender of CMKM Diamonds Inc. Common Shares.
ttp://www.dtcc.com/downloads/legal/imp_notices/2006/dtc/reo/reo_9516-06.pdf
BHollenegg
|
|