|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Sept 16, 2008 14:02:26 GMT -5
from the Millionaire Board....
ontheroad
DIAMOND MINER
Re: JV's meetings of 9/15
« Reply #11 Today at 12:12pm »
Agenda
1.) To recieve the audited financial statements of the Company for the fiscal period ending Dec. 31, 2007 (UUC, SEI) October 31, 2007 (SUV), together with the auditor's report thereon.
2.) To appoint the auditor for the Company and to authorize the director's to fix the remuneration to be paid to the auditor.
3.) To authorize the directors of the Company to apply for continuance of the Company as a Saskatchewan corporation pursuant to the provisions of The Business Corporations Act (Saskatchewan) [and The Business Corporations Act (British Columbia) (SUV only this part] [and the Canada Business Corporations Act. (UUC only)] Shane does not have this for item 3 but has the rest.
4.) To elect directors for the ensuing year.
5.) To ratify and approve the Company's existing stock option plans.
6.) To transact such other business as may be brought before the meeting.
By Order of the Board
"Kyle Kozuska"
President
ontheroad
DIAMOND MINER
Re: JV's meetings of 9/15
« Reply #13 Today at 12:26pm »
After looking through the auditors reports for all three companies, there is no mention of CMKX or Emmerson Koch as owning any percentages of any of their claims. However, for Smeaton, United Uranium mentions they are a 50% JV for 25 separate groups of claims awaiting a decision from the Appeal Court of Saskatchewan. If memory serves me correctly the court awarded in favor of UUC and I believe the JV was UC and Emerson Koch so CMKX could have a horse in that race still.
AIMHO
Richard
|
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Sept 16, 2008 14:34:04 GMT -5
from the Millionaire board.....
john3339
DIAMOND JEDI WARLORD
Reorganization
« Thread Started Today at 9:19am »
Question: since this week, yesterday and today seem to be plowing new ground (yeah another barnyard analogy) in the global financial markets, what if?
What if the United States declared a universal reorganization of debt? That is, they declared an end to the Fed's money policies as being ineffective to stave off the collapse of the banking industry?
Instead, the Fed is closed, with all the regulatory responsibilities reverting back to the US Treasury, the investment banks, major banks, and insuring entities are put on "holiday" while federal auditors review the books for soundness and irregularities that might show sound business practices and unsound business practices. The Treasury would close the unsound institutions, and roll whatever value they could, into the sound institutions.
The bad paper and hidden derivatives would be held in a frozen account by the Treasury, and put on a schedule for systematic write-off over time by the Treasury.
Those in charge of these institutions with unsound practices would be held financially liable, with total disgorgement of personal assets as much as possible, with prison time for those who successfully liquidated anything of value that might be attach-able. Also, these institutions would have all corporate assets liquidated to the extent possible, with all proceeds going to the Treasury to support this reorganization.
It would surely put the global economy into a major shake, but with the backing and guarantee of the US Treasury and Government, it could provide the stability the markets need right now. It would expose once and for all, all of the underlying garbage that's trickling out, bit by bit. Take it all in now, knowing there would be no more surprises down the road.
And what if all of the G-8 countries did generally the same thing with their financial institutions?
The healthy institutions come out of the audit stronger (and probably) bigger than ever. The world sees the US institutions as viable again...plus the Federal commitment to back up and punish the criminals would be seen as integrity, worthy of the trust needed to continue financial operations.
Granted, it does little to help the little guy. But the way things are going, the little guy is going to get hurt even worse if this slides into a general depression.
I think it may be time for the world economic powers to sit back, take a deep breath, and hit the "reset" button...clean house...reassign regulatory responsibilities...and begin again.
"There's no intelligent life down here."
(just a coffee induced idea.)
john
texastommy
DIAMOND DIGGER
Re: Reorganization
« Reply #3 Today at 9:54am »
And some more totally wild speculation... What if the US suddenly rolls out the resources superstore (with the aid of Canada)? The whole shebang fires up at the last minute to save the day. If the entire conglomerate scheme can be kept under wraps in a "Fipke - Fire and Ice" - type maneuver, then why not the transmission / distribution of natural resources from our neighbors up north? How dramatically would the geopolitical landscape be altered if we were able to tell Russia and the Middle East to go get lost (to put it nicely). I have had this ion of a thought rattling around in my skull for a long time, but I may just be dreaming up a fairy tale. I hope against hope for a happy ending for all of us.
As usual, very interesting thoughts John.
Tom
|
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Sept 16, 2008 14:35:56 GMT -5
from the Millionaire Board.... sully47
DIAMOND JEDI
I want to invite EVERYONE....« Thread Started Today at 2:05pm » to personally thank each member of the Senate Banking and Financing Committee for their STELLAR job of managing our markets....NOT! What.....are they all that crooked....retarded......or both! Send them a love note....I know I am! banking.senate.gov/public/ |
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Sept 16, 2008 14:39:38 GMT -5
Posted by: IQ1
Date: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 11:28:00 AM In reply to: pontalba who wrote msg# 259548 Post # of 259600 I guess this never happened and people were just giving CMKX money because they were being generous including Entourage: CMKX/101047025 ownership of other companies: (Please note the % in the braket is from the 22.5% UCAD ownership below) 25%(+%11.5) GEMM - Juina Mining (Nov.18/04 95Mil shares+ Nov.30 127Mil shares) Of which: Diagem is 49% owned by GEMM - super rich copper vein 12.5% Shane Resources (not Shore Gold) 10% CIM - Casavant International Mining - Royalty(Zinc) 100% CMKXTreme 80% ECPN - El Kapitan Mine "Cod River Mining 13 Claims in AZ" 60%(+%9) Nevada Minerals - 500K Acres - Athabasca Basin mine - Uranium 80% Yellow River mine - Gold 22.5% USCA/UCAD - U.S. Canadian Minerals (+18%) COD Mine (+%22.5)Nevada Magnetics (+18%) Properly 1000 (Brazil Diamond mine - Diagem) -CMKX owns 36.5% of GEMM, GEMM owns 49% of of Property 1000 (Diamonds in Brazil), hence CMKX owns 18% of Property 1000. Money obtained: USCA $3Mil+$2.5Mil+(7.5Mil*3) shares CYXG $2Mil*10% + 2.5Mil shares Shane Resources $300K (82 Falcon Claims) SGGM $10Mil ------------- Other Companies ownership in CMKX: 9.16% USCA 5% SGGM 10% Shane Resources Shares distributed: 75Bil Nevada Minerals 40Bil CIM UCAD owns: 51% of GEMM 80% of COD Mine 40% of 500Acr Nevada Minerals 15% of CMKX 100% of Nevada Magnetics Drilling progress: Hole #1 - kimb intersected 428ft Hole #2 - S of#1 at 247ft Hole #3 - E of#1 no intersection Hole #4 - Wof#1 at 206 ft Hole #5 - Nof#4 at 226ft Two have already been identified as containing diamonds, and rumors are that the other two had the geologists eyes light up.  Posted by: pontalba
Date: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 11:39:29 AM In reply to: IQ1 who wrote msg# 259558 Post # of 259600 no, IQ, it didn't happen. It was shells swapping spit.
|
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Sept 16, 2008 14:50:48 GMT -5
 Posted by: jimmym4
Date: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 12:47:04 PM In reply to: None Post # of 259600 Just heard a good one!!!!! approx 30 more Lawsuits coming to a theater near you!!...GO TEAM!! WOW 30 Lawsuits?  ??..could it be? ??
|
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Sept 16, 2008 14:58:53 GMT -5
from the Conglomerate Board.......
By: jcline
16 Sep 2008, 03:41 PM EDT
Msg. 34119 of 34119
(This msg. is a reply to 34108 by pleiadian.)
Jump to msg. #
Mr. Mahue knew who every bad boy was...have no doubt.
Agree.. he is more than likely chuckling at the fruits of his labors.
|
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Sept 16, 2008 15:01:06 GMT -5
By: seatech3
16 Sep 2008, 02:43 PM EDT
Msg. 34115 of 34119
(This msg. is a reply to 34113 by pleiadian.)
Jump to msg. #
pleiadian
We should remember the instrumental role the SEC played in creating the chaos in doing nothing to stop it, and, like every other government official in this drama, received no criticism or no skepticism.
As Judy would say; Well DUH!
As one very wise person and very good friend has said;
If you always do what you've always done, then you always get what you always got!
It was good times and living high on the hog at the middle class expense until they started attacking each other. There is no honor among thieves and they are now taking each other out. JUST PAY US.
By: pleiadian
16 Sep 2008, 03:03 PM EDT
Msg. 34117 of 34119
(This msg. is a reply to 34115 by seatech3.)
Jump to msg. #
seatech..I agree...It is time for our due..But there maybe a couple more shoes to drop. Then put humpty dumpty back together. Sound currency, strong dollar and some real cash..
|
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Sept 16, 2008 15:03:25 GMT -5
By: freedom241
16 Sep 2008, 03:45 PM EDT
Msg. 765739 of 765745
Jump to msg. #
whatever happened to wodan after this claim? ...
By: zahnj
05 Oct 2006, 11:39 AM EDT
Msg. 394929 of 765738
(This msg. is a reply to 394909 by spellbergg.)
Jump to msg. #
spellbergg Wodan said they are still expecting a PR by mid October. He said if for any reason the money was delayed beyond the elections they think the company will provide a small payment to shareholders. .10 to .15. before the end of October.
Please note I'm not a follower of the Belgians. But that's what he stated
|
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Sept 16, 2008 15:10:55 GMT -5
Today at 2:38pm, abadgoodgirl wrote:
ines, what are the odds that anyone at our level....or at least my level, know the answer? I think it is pretty slim.
One thing is probable....money was collected for the 'bona fide' stockholder certs.. the big question is whether the funds were collected from overseas or places that are out of the jurisdiction of the United States, imo.
ines
DIAMOND JEDI WARLORD
Re: Spoke with the same source again today..
« Reply #73 Today at 2:59pm »
well abad,
I think i have a good idea on what person they are refering here to. ( lets say my psychic told me .. so everybody feels ok )
So now,, all this talk.. about we will get paid but they dont know when or bla bla bla ..
bla bla bla..
well. .. did we collect for nss or not? << that is what i want to know.
Second, this person suposedly said.. or mentioned at certain time about payment " maybe in september "
well we are in september..
now debating its a sting ok.. fine..
etc etc...
just tell us .. did you get confirmation that ..we collected on our certs or not... that i all i need to hear.
And i dont think i heard that from Oaks.. and this source.
That is one thing this source should know if he/she has any clue on anything else.
mgpaul
DIAMOND DIGGER
Re: Spoke with the same source again today..« Reply #66 Today at 2:43pm »
Andy has become "The Quiet Man"
|
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Sept 16, 2008 16:31:12 GMT -5
By: pontiyak
16 Sep 2008, 04:11 PM EDT
Msg. 34120 of 34125Jump to msg. # Never have I had so much fun watching from the cheap seats....  yak By: pontiyak
16 Sep 2008, 05:19 PM EDT
Msg. 34122 of 34125Jump to msg. # The shoe is now on the other foot.... U.S. banks put heat on SEC to curb illegal shorting Tuesday, September 16, 2008; 4:42 PM WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A U.S. banking group increased the pressure on securities regulators to clamp down on the illegal short-selling as declines in shares of major financial companies accelerated this week. The American Bankers Association said many of its members have seen precipitous declines in their stock, high trading volumes and huge spikes in so-called failures to deliver, leading them to conclude that their stock is being manipulated. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission is expected to strengthen rules against abusive short selling before the end of the week. However, the banking association said it was not enough. "We are concerned that the commission's forthcoming action will not go far enough to protect banks and bank holding companies from these abusive and manipulative practices," the ABA said in a letter to banking regulators. The letter, dated September 15 and released on Tuesday, was addressed to the heads of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp, the Comptroller of the Currency and the Office of Thrift Supervision. "We would hope that the federal bank regulators would emphasize with SEC Chairman (Christopher) Cox the appropriate redress of this problem as an issue of safety and soundness to the nation's bank system," said the trade group, which represents banks of all sizes. In mid July amid similar market turmoil, the SEC issued a temporary emergency rule to curb illegal naked short selling in 19 major finance stocks, including Lehman Brothers (LEH.N) and mortgage finance giants Freddie Mac (FNM.N) and Fannie Mae (FRE.N) . The rule ended mid-August and the ABA and others have been pressuring the SEC to reinstate and broaden the rule to include all companies. On the flip side, short sellers, hedge funds and the brokerage industry have warned against doing so. The SEC is not planning on reinstating the temporary rule that required traders to pre-borrow stock in the 19 finance firms before executing a short sale. The agency is expected to take action on a number of proposals to strengthen its short selling rule, including one that would shorten the time in which traders must buy back stock if they fail to deliver a security by settlement date. A "naked" short sale occurs when an investor sells stock that has not yet been borrowed. Broker-dealers will sometimes accidentally fail to deliver stock to investors who have arranged to borrow it. If this is done intentionally, it is illegal. Lehman Brothers Holdings filed for bankruptcy and the mortgage giants were taken over by the government. (Reporting by Rachelle Younglai; editing by Carol Bishopric)
|
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Sept 16, 2008 19:06:58 GMT -5
By: grajekk
16 Sep 2008, 06:57 PM EDT
Msg. 765769 of 765807
Jump to msg. #
certainly is quiet up in Saskatoon.. I thought there was a shareholders meeting and CEO announcement going to happen yesterday...
|
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Sept 16, 2008 19:07:45 GMT -5
By: sully47
16 Sep 2008, 07:02 PM EDT
Msg. 765771 of 765808Jump to msg. # Please....EVERYONE.... write to each member of the Senate Banking and financing Committee....they have done a stellar job with our markets and banks....NOT! Tell them how you really feel! banking.senate.gov/public/
|
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Sept 16, 2008 19:08:34 GMT -5
By: aladin99
16 Sep 2008, 07:07 PM EDT
Msg. 765773 of 765809
Jump to msg. #
All Bankers = Zero...if they are forced to
disclose all their illegal activities....
|
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Sept 16, 2008 19:10:15 GMT -5
By: aladin99
16 Sep 2008, 07:28 PM EDT
Msg. 765782 of 765809
Jump to msg. #
When people close their accounts or declare CMKX as Wash Sale Brokers own all those shares....Next step is how to deal with all th0se shares? Should brokers return th0se shares back to original owners?
By: leowanta
16 Sep 2008, 07:30 PM EDT
Msg. 765784 of 765810
(This msg. is a reply to 765782 by aladin99.)
Jump to msg. #
not your problem...don't worry about it.
|
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Sept 16, 2008 19:12:04 GMT -5
By: aladin99
16 Sep 2008, 07:24 PM EDT
Msg. 765781 of 765811
Jump to msg. #
BIG bankers die...small revoked stock survived
By: spunkwater
16 Sep 2008, 07:32 PM EDT
Msg. 765785 of 765811
(This msg. is a reply to 765781 by aladin99.)
Jump to msg. #
Right, aladin, thanks to the hard work and dedication of Kevin and Bill. We got lucky.
By: CHICPICK
16 Sep 2008, 07:34 PM EDT
Msg. 765787 of 765813
(This msg. is a reply to 765785 by spunkwater.)
Jump to msg. #
spunk, AND THE HARDER THEY WORK, THE
LUCKIER WE GET.
|
|
