Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 13, 2013 19:15:48 GMT -5
Mike I appreciate any effort to bring light to this maness!! So I thank you and everyone evolved in the AG effort however, It netted exactly the same as AH and the bivens!!! So to sit here and pat yourself and others on he back yet in he same breath beat up on others that put their lives an careers on the line to get us paid is a bit TWO faced IMO! Unless you have verifiable proof that AH and BH was out to screw us ( wich you don't have or your AG movement would of resulted in indictments) I would thank them just as I have thanked you!! Thanks for your effort AH if you have proof of a trust lets get it in the open and watch some shareholder will!!!! If you don't have proof AH tell us that as well so we can move the freak on!!! Thank you Timonesock for an excellent message...your fairness is greatly appreciated. The reasons I post the message initiating this thread ..keep the paper trail visible until the funds are released, ...to get CEO Kirkpatrick officially involved by providing a conduit to exchange evidence, ...to stop the fighting amongst shareholders, ...for shareholders peace of mind, ...for accountability. When the lawsuit was active we had a point and direction we could go to and monitor what was going on. Now that the lawsuit is over, the updates should be frequent if we are finished and it's only a process issue. CEO Kirkpatrick, when he first came on board, was briefed by Attorney Hodges on the amount breakdown. CEO Kirkpatrick wasn't provided with any evidence... Attorney Hodges was still in the lawsuit. I do not feel that there should be a problem to show CEO Kirkpatrick just enough evidence to convince the CEO to acknowledge there are funds; plus, I have CEO Kirkpatrick's word that if he is shown evidence he will use whatever means available to help get the funds released to the shareholders asap. Before I post the message, I gave CEO Kirkpatrick and Attorney Hodges a chance to respond. The spirit of the letter "to get the flow of communication in a constructive direction." I am not getting better health wise. I can't go on forever. I thought hard and many times for hours on what to do that would expedite the release, provide accountability and enough transparency to satisfy the majority of the shareholders. I did my best and did what I thought was best under the circumstances. Thank you , BHollenegg After five cardiac ablations, two cardiac catheterization, the onset of asthma, two kidney cancer surgeries, a spinal fusion and discectomy, and a knee arthroscopy with meniscectomy, I can empathize with you, Bob. None of us are getting any younger and I believe you did your best and what you thought was best; a yeoman's work. Mike
|
|
|
Post by briwadd on Aug 13, 2013 22:00:16 GMT -5
So Bob, the CEO of CMKX is essentially calling Al Hodges a fraud and a swindler...what are your thoughts?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 13, 2013 22:32:23 GMT -5
Update from AL who wants that? who wants "soon" again? or "betting man " stuff again? .... only three things will change the anxiety level ..... 1. a check 2. proof of a trust 3. we find out AL has no evidence of anything ... other than that we are still P.S. the cmkx circus from hell with the scary clowns rolls on !
|
|
|
Post by BHollenegg on Aug 14, 2013 5:02:20 GMT -5
So Bob, the CEO of CMKX is essentially calling Al Hodges a fraud and a swindler...what are your thoughts? My thoughts...when did Briwadd become the spokesperson for CEO Kirkpatrick? Let's see what happens. Thank you, BHollenegg
|
|
|
Post by John Winston Lennon O'Boogie on Aug 14, 2013 6:17:51 GMT -5
So Bob, the CEO of CMKX is essentially calling Al Hodges a fraud and a swindler...what are your thoughts? My thoughts...when did Briwadd become the spokesperson for CEO Kirkpatrick? Let's see what happens. Thank you, BHollenegg Cmark International Inc Single why isn't this pinned on your board king100036 minutes ago Al Hodges is holding our money hostage while he watches us hit refresh waiting for his answer. He watches the boards and he knows the torture we are enduring, he was a huge part of it for years. Now he holds our the release of our money in his hands, well what if he says no. Then this was exactly what mark faulk said, a sting that morphed into a scam. It would mean that al hodges and the og aided in the theft of our land, the best plate of land on earth per forrest gate who was right beside us. This is sad, sad that any reasonable person, ie bhollenegg, would have asked al hodges whether he was willing to give up the information needed to release our funds before he ever posted that post. Any reasonable person would not add to the torture, it is not necessary. But that is not how those that run cmkx role, and never was. Al end the torture and just tell steve no and put us out of our misery: From: "Steve Kirkpatrick" <stevek@cmkmdiamondsinc.com> Date: 13 August, 2013 3:15:14 PM PDT To: "'Perry Mazzei'" <honzer@shaw.ca> Subject: RE: Evidence Reply-To: <stevek@cmkmdiamondsinc.com>
No communication whatsoever – as expected
From: Perry Mazzei [mailto:honzer@shaw.ca] Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 1:16 AM To: stevek@cmkmdiamondsinc.com Subject: Re: Evidence
Thanks for the quick response Steve,
Has Al Hodges made any attempt to contact you in the last 48 hrs ?
Thanks Perry Mazzei honzer@shaw.ca
From: Steve Kirkpatrick Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2013 12:08 PM To: 'Perry Mazzei' Subject: RE: Evidence
Perry:
Hodges has never shown me any evidence and never will – even the plaintiffs have never seen a shred of proof. I flew to California at great expense and got nothing except the promise of imminent payout of F&P between $3.50 and $4.00/share, and a two-tiered offering of $5 - $8/share depending on which “deal” a shareholder chooses. At $10/share our largest shareholder would become the 2 nd wealthiest person on the planet, and the most liquid by far! No way…….
Certainly if Hodges were to provide REAL PROOF of a trust (he cannot) then I would gladly help any way possible to get shareholders paid. I would love to see all CMKM shareholders get rich. However, the continual promise of great and imminent wealth is totally preposterous and will never happen. This stuff is damaging to many shareholders, and needs to stop. I am the guy that fields the phone calls and e-mails from hurting shareholders expecting to get rich any day now – sad.
Steve K Reply
Please log in to post
|
|
|
Post by e362 on Aug 14, 2013 6:18:44 GMT -5
So Bob, the CEO of CMKX is essentially calling Al Hodges a fraud and a swindler...what are your thoughts? My thoughts...when did Briwadd become the spokesperson for CEO Kirkpatrick? Let's see what happens. Thank you, BHollenegg Nothing will happen Bob, because AH's bluff has been called and he cant ( notice I didn't say wont) back up his claims. The suit is over, he no longer has his excuse that showing the evidence would hurt his case. Maybe it is his time to stop playing the hero and give the shareholders their chance to dictate their own destiny......Show the trust or just go away. imho
|
|
|
Post by marbearcat on Aug 14, 2013 6:25:58 GMT -5
My thoughts...when did Briwadd become the spokesperson for CEO Kirkpatrick? Let's see what happens. Thank you, BHollenegg Nothing will happen Bob, because AH's bluff has been called and he cant ( notice I didn't say wont) back up his claims. The suit is over, he no longer has his excuse that showing the evidence would hurt his case. Maybe it is his time to stop playing the hero and give the shareholders their chance to dictate their own destiny......Show the trust or just go away. imho Well, if either a) no funds were collected for us or b) collected but taken ala Listener, we're cooked. S.K. isn't gonna get squat done in my opinion. What bizness dude would walk into a huge cluster-fudge like this? Maybe one who was sent to throw the last pile of dirt on the dirty deeds? Get rid of the past? Please.
|
|
|
Post by briwadd on Aug 14, 2013 7:33:05 GMT -5
So Bob, the CEO of CMKX is essentially calling Al Hodges a fraud and a swindler...what are your thoughts? My thoughts...when did Briwadd become the spokesperson for CEO Kirkpatrick? Let's see what happens. Thank you, BHollenegg Uh Bob, I think Steve's view on Hodges is widely known. I am hardly speaking for him. Truth is, Steve is the only individual working on behalf of shareholders that has shown us any respect at all. And he has been slammed for his efforts by many because his views (based on facts) don't line up with the nonsense Hodges has been spewing for years. Bob, can you name one individual on planet earth that has seen any proof of a trust...besides Hodges? Briwadd
|
|
|
Post by John Winston Lennon O'Boogie on Aug 14, 2013 8:08:06 GMT -5
My thoughts...when did Briwadd become the spokesperson for CEO Kirkpatrick? Let's see what happens. Thank you, BHollenegg Uh Bob, I think Steve's view on Hodges is widely known. I am hardly speaking for him. Truth is, Steve is the only individual working on behalf of shareholders that has shown us any respect at all. And he has been slammed for his efforts by many because his views (based on facts) don't line up with the nonsense Hodges has been spewing for years. Bob, can you name one individual on planet earth that has seen any proof of a trust...besides Hodges? Briwadd I would hope that UC and IBM seen it.. We may never know until we get the money.. Steve ain't doing this for nothing and that's about all he is showing in the books. It's all about the naked shorts. They may have been collected on or Steve is still trying to put a few good lawyers together. You would think after 10 years that all the ducks would be in order. Mr. Hodges,,,, as I read whats been going on the last few months about Basel 3, a few more bankers going down and what happen yesterday in the news, I still stand behind you. You don't have to make us the richest people on the Earth. Just a few million would do me good at this point of my life. Just give us an update that your still alive. Bob H. In you last post you stated your not feeling good. Get well kid. JWLOB
|
|
|
Post by lewis12 on Aug 14, 2013 8:32:04 GMT -5
My thoughts...when did Briwadd become the spokesperson for CEO Kirkpatrick? Let's see what happens. Thank you, BHollenegg Nothing will happen Bob, because AH's bluff has been called and he cant ( notice I didn't say wont) back up his claims. The suit is over, he no longer has his excuse that showing the evidence would hurt his case. Maybe it is his time to stop playing the hero and give the shareholders their chance to dictate their own destiny......Show the trust or just go away. imho that theory works now because the case was denied. But what would happen if the lawsuit went forward and he had to have shown his hand? Was he just going to say "oh wait, I guess I didn't have any proof....welp see ya later!".
|
|
|
Post by e362 on Aug 14, 2013 8:52:36 GMT -5
Nothing will happen Bob, because AH's bluff has been called and he cant ( notice I didn't say wont) back up his claims. The suit is over, he no longer has his excuse that showing the evidence would hurt his case. Maybe it is his time to stop playing the hero and give the shareholders their chance to dictate their own destiny......Show the trust or just go away. imho that theory works now because the case was denied. But what would happen if the lawsuit went forward and he had to have shown his hand? Was he just going to say "oh wait, I guess I didn't have any proof....welp see ya later!". IF is the biggest word in the dictionary. My gut tells me this suit was never put together to win in the first place, it was all some elaborate stall tactic. Why is the cruel question?
|
|
|
Post by John Winston Lennon O'Boogie on Aug 14, 2013 8:55:16 GMT -5
that theory works now because the case was denied. But what would happen if the lawsuit went forward and he had to have shown his hand? Was he just going to say "oh wait, I guess I didn't have any proof....welp see ya later!". IF is the biggest word in the dictionary. My gut tells me this suit was never put together to win in the first place, it was all some elaborate stall tactic. Why is the cruel question? IF---> Small word, big meaning..
|
|
|
Post by lewis12 on Aug 14, 2013 9:57:32 GMT -5
that theory works now because the case was denied. But what would happen if the lawsuit went forward and he had to have shown his hand? Was he just going to say "oh wait, I guess I didn't have any proof....welp see ya later!". IF is the biggest word in the dictionary. My gut tells me this suit was never put together to win in the first place, it was all some elaborate stall tactic. Why is the cruel question? I agree 100%. Nothing makes sense to me either way. The money is astronomically out of range to think it's just sitting there for us. But at the same time, who devotes years of their time, a life long reputation, and their own money to stall?
|
|
|
Post by e362 on Aug 14, 2013 10:34:31 GMT -5
IF is the biggest word in the dictionary. My gut tells me this suit was never put together to win in the first place, it was all some elaborate stall tactic. Why is the cruel question? I agree 100%. Nothing makes sense to me either way. The money is astronomically out of range to think it's just sitting there for us. But at the same time, who devotes years of their time, a life long reputation, and their own money to stall? Someone that has something else to gain, thats who! As for risking his reputation, thats anyones guess, we have all heard the stories about not being available for the Fryer paperwork ( talk about professional curtesy), the worker that claimed AH owes her money, the empty office, foreclosure etc, what reputation are you risking at this point? Desperate people do desperate things.....whats the joke, what are 500 lawyers on the bottom of the ocean.....a nice start!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 14, 2013 10:35:56 GMT -5
IF is the biggest word in the dictionary. My gut tells me this suit was never put together to win in the first place, it was all some elaborate stall tactic. Why is the cruel question? I agree 100%. Nothing makes sense to me either way. The money is astronomically out of range to think it's just sitting there for us. But at the same time, who devotes years of their time, a life long reputation, and their own money to stall? Someone who isn't stalling at all? Mike
|
|